Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
19 Jan 2026, 22:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
25% (02:11) correct
75%
(02:48)
wrong
based on 100
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The oldest extant iteration of Gameco’s coding engine is forty years old. The fact that the code used in this engine frequently uses lower-level programming languages indicates that Gameco formulated its coding practices at least ten years before the aforesaid coding engine was produced. Keep in mind, Gameco adopted its coding engine from Crytek; presumably, alongside the coding engine, Gameco also adopted Crytek’s then-current practices regarding the programming languages employed. And although Crytek coding was originally an amalgamation of lower- and higher-level languages, forty years ago, Crytek was consistently using higher-level languages, and had been doing so for about ten years.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first and the second each describe evidence used to challenge the position that the argument seeks to establish.
(B) The first is evidence on which an objection to the position that the argument seeks to establish is based; the second is that position.
(C) The first and the second each provide evidence supporting the position that the argument seeks to establish.
(D) The first is evidence on which an objection to the position that the argument seeks to establish is based; the second is a consideration the argument introduces to counter the force of that evidence.
(E) The first provides evidence supporting the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is that position.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first and the second each describe evidence used to challenge the position that the argument seeks to establish.
(B) The first is evidence on which an objection to the position that the argument seeks to establish is based; the second is that position.
(C) The first and the second each provide evidence supporting the position that the argument seeks to establish.
(D) The first is evidence on which an objection to the position that the argument seeks to establish is based; the second is a consideration the argument introduces to counter the force of that evidence.
(E) The first provides evidence supporting the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is that position.
20 Jan 2026, 00:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
BF 1= The fact that the code used in this engine frequently uses lower-level programming languages
BF 2= And although Crytek coding was originally an amalgamation of lower- and higher-level languages, forty years ago, Crytek was consistently using higher-level languages, and had been doing so for about ten years.
A first and second are not challenging the position. they are opposite to each other
B first past is correct. second is wrong.
C they both dont provide support to the position.
D this clearly defines the relation. second is against the first one
E second is not the position that argument seeks to establish
BF 2= And although Crytek coding was originally an amalgamation of lower- and higher-level languages, forty years ago, Crytek was consistently using higher-level languages, and had been doing so for about ten years.
A first and second are not challenging the position. they are opposite to each other
B first past is correct. second is wrong.
C they both dont provide support to the position.
D this clearly defines the relation. second is against the first one
E second is not the position that argument seeks to establish
ExpertsGlobal5
20 Jan 2026, 12:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
ExpertsGlobal5
Let’s understand how the passage navigates.
The previous iteration of Gameco coding engine happened before 40 yrs. BF1: The code used in Gameco engine frequently uses Low level programming language (LLPL).
The Gameco coding is produced before 10 yrs which is stated, so the actual Gameco coding is produced 50 yrs back. We should not ignore the fact, that Gameco adopted its coding engine from Crytek. Not only was the coding engine adapted, but the programming language was also adopted.
BF2: Crytek was using a coding language which is an amalgamation of Lower level and Higher level language. 40 yrs ago, Crytek was consistently using Higher level language, and this had been using 10 yrs ago. So, Crytek is using the HLPL before 50 yrs.
If Gameco has adapted the coding engine and programming language from Crytek, then BF1 would have been partially correct, or misinterpreted. As Crytek, uses both Higher and lower level programming language. So, BF2 provides evidences which are objecting the BF1.
Option D exactly resonates the crux mentioned above.
