Non-capitalist states appear to suffer economic collapse much sooner than do capitalist states. Historians theorize that
it is interventionism and destabilizing influences exercised by capitalist states that lead to non-capitalist states suffering economic collapse faster than capitalist states do. This theory is hard to verify directly, as it is difficult to pinpoint with any significant accuracy what punitive practices have been undertaken by capitalist states against non-capitalist ones. A detailed study of Cuba, a non-capitalist state, however, demonstrates that
much of the economic difficulty experienced by the nation arises from sanctions and trade embargoes placed by the USA, a capitalist state. This indicates that the historians’ theory has a firm basis in reality.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first describes a position opposed by the argument; the second presents evidence that undermines support for the opposed position.
B. The first describes a position opposed by the argument; the second states the argument’s main conclusion.
C. The first presents an explanatory hypothesis; the second states the argument’s main conclusion.
D. The first presents an explanatory hypothesis; the second presents evidence that supports alternative explanation.
E. The first presents an explanatory hypothesis; the second presents evidence that tends to support this hypothesis.
|
This Daily Butler Question was provided by
Experts' Global
|
|
Sponsored
|
|
|