A particular software malfunction has been observed frequently in large enterprise systems but only rarely in personal computers. Both enterprise systems and personal computers often use the type of third-party application identified as the source of the malfunction. Systems affected by the malfunction typically take more than a year of continuous use before the problem becomes apparent; however, personal computers, unlike enterprise systems, are generally replaced or upgraded within their first year of use.Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?The correct answer to this Conclusion question will state something that is clearly supported by the statements in the passage.
A. The malfunction cannot be transmitted to mobile devices by personal computers.The passage says nothing that indicates whether the malfunction can be transmitted from one device to another.
Eiminate.
B. There is no way to determine whether a personal computer is affected by the malfunction before the problem becomes apparent.The passage does not indicate that there is "no way to determine" whether a personal computer is affected by the malfunction before the problem becomes apparent.
It says only that the malfunction has been "observed" rarely in personal computers.
The fact that it is rarely observed doesn't mean that there is "no way" to determine that it is occurring before it becomes apparent.
Eliminate.
C. A failure to observe the malfunction in personal computer populations is not good evidence that personal computers are resistant to the malfunction.This choice is interesting.
After all, the passage says the following:
Systems affected by the malfunction typically take more than a year of continuous use before the problem becomes apparent.and
personal computers ... are generally replaced or upgraded within their first year of useSo, it could be that the reason why the malfunction is rarely observed in personal computers is not that they are resistant but rather that they are replaced before the malfunction becomes apparent.
Thus, the facts in the passage support the conclusion that, as this choice says, failure to observe the malfunction in personal computers doesn't mean that they are resistant to it.
Keep.
D. A system affected by the malfunction but not yet exhibiting problems cannot cause the malfunction in another system using the same application.The passage says nothing that indicates whether systems affected by the malfunction can cause it in other systems.
Eliminate.
E. The third-party application is probably not the only source of the malfunction.The passage does not provide any reason to believe that there could be other sources of the malfunction.
Rather, it states that the third-party application has been identified as "the source" of the malfunction, implying that it is the only source of it.
So, if anything, this choice contradicts, rather than is supported by, the passage.
Eliminate.
Correct answer: C