Last visit was: 07 Sep 2026, 04:04 It is currently 07 Sep 2026, 04:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,181
Own Kudos:
839,673
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111,357
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,181
Kudos: 839,673
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
icandoit4u
Joined: 19 Sep 2025
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
47
 [1]
Given Kudos: 127
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V79 DI80
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V79 DI80
Posts: 52
Kudos: 47
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Minka99
Joined: 15 Jun 2026
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
29
 [1]
Given Kudos: 85
Location: Austria
Concentration: Accounting, Other
Products:
Posts: 40
Kudos: 29
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Vivek1707
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 353
Own Kudos:
188
 [1]
Given Kudos: 150
Products:
Posts: 353
Kudos: 188
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. More crayfish means more food for bass. If anything, that makes it harder to blame the population decline on lack of food. Eliminate
B. This explains the relationship between bass and trout, but it doesn't connect the trout ban to the decline in bass. Out
C. Yes, this is exactly what you'd expect if fishing caused the decline. Where fishing is banned, bass are still plentiful.
D. If recreational fishing became less popular, it's less likely to have caused such a sharp decline. Out
E. This is too general. What happened to other fish in other places doesn't tell us much about bass in this river. Out
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,181
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,357
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,181
Kudos: 839,673
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Between 2000 and 2010, the number of bass in the Mississippi River and its tributaries experienced a catastrophic decline. There is little evidence that pollution or disease was the cause, so it is likely that there was an increase in the number of bass killed by other means. Typically, recreational fishermen in the region prefer to pursue several varieties of river trout, but a state law passed in 2001 banned the catching of trout in the area. Thus, it is likely that recreational fishing was the immediate cause of the decline of the bass population.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. The number of Over crayfish, one of the primary sources of nutrition for bass, has quadrupled since the bass population collapsed.

B. Bass prey upon trout and compete for many of the same food sources.

C. The most significant concentrations of remaining bass are in areas of the river where fishing is prohibited.

D. Recreational fishing is less popular now than it was in 2000.

E. Recreational fishing has caused a decline in the populations of several species of fish in other habitats.


­OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


The argument here is basically that recreational fishing caused the bass population to decline, because, presumably, after fishers were prohibited to catch trout, they began to catch bass. We're asked to choose the information that strengthens this argument.

Choice (A) introduces an irrelevant detail about the crayfish population that doesn't relate to the connection between fishing laws and bass population.

Choice (B) describes the feeding habits of bass; this is not relevant to how fishing laws affected the bass population.

Choice (C) clearly relates to the issue here. If bass have nearly vanished in areas where fishing is allowed, and remain in significant concentrations in areas where fishing is prohibited, it looks like the fishing laws might indeed have had something to do with their overall decline.

Choice (D) mentions the year 2000, which is unhelpful because we aren't given any information in the passage about that year.

Choice(E) does not do as much to strengthen the argument as (C) because it talks about other types of fish in other habitats, which is not that relevant.

The correct answer is choice C­
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts