Last visit was: 07 Sep 2026, 00:24 It is currently 07 Sep 2026, 00:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
yc168
Joined: 11 Nov 2024
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,132
Own Kudos:
1,125
 [3]
Given Kudos: 855
Products:
Posts: 1,132
Kudos: 1,125
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,831
Own Kudos:
14,408
 [3]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,831
Kudos: 14,408
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
PearlNova
Joined: 15 May 2026
Last visit: 18 Aug 2026
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,831
Own Kudos:
14,408
 [3]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,831
Kudos: 14,408
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PearlNova
HI
I still don't get why E can't be the answer because in my opinion, that is the main conclusion.
Someone please help.
I’d say (E) cannot be the conclusion because it is the reason introduced by “since.” The ethicist uses that point about relatives’ grief to support the broader claim that the financial savings from ASA cannot be considered alone. That broader claim is what (C) expresses.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,291
Own Kudos:
33,901
 [2]
Given Kudos: 716
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,291
Kudos: 33,901
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi PearlNova,

I can see why E is tempting: the grief of the relatives feels like the emotional heart of the argument, so it's easy to mistake it for the main point. But E is actually the ethicist's reason, not the ethicist's conclusion.

Look at the signal word the ethicist uses:

"since the relatives of the patients who die... would be particularly grieved, the financial saving involved in using ASA over TPA must also be weighed against such considerations."

The word "since" always introduces a premise - the support. So the grief of the relatives is the evidence. What that evidence is offered to prove comes after the comma: that the money saved must also be weighed against these considerations. That "must be weighed" claim is the point the whole argument is driving toward - and that is exactly what (C) restates.

A quick test you can always run: put the two statements in a "because" sentence and see which order makes sense.

- "The cost can't be judged only against lives saved, because relatives would grieve." ✅ Makes sense.
- "Relatives would grieve, because the cost can't be judged only against lives saved." ❌ Backwards.

The statement that sits in the because slot is the premise - that's E. The statement it's supporting is the conclusion - that's C.

One more note: E also slightly misreads the stimulus. The ethicist doesn't compare how much relatives grieve under ASA vs. TPA; it just says relatives of those who die on the cheaper drug would be particularly grieved. So even on its own wording, E adds a comparison the argument never makes.

Bottom line: E is the why, C is the point. Whenever you spot "since" or "because," the real conclusion is on the other side of it.

Answer: C

PearlNova
HI
I still don't get why E can't be the answer because in my opinion, that is the main conclusion.
Someone please help.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts