Clearly, the pollution of the beaches is doubly harmful. Not only

Question

Clearly, the pollution of the beaches is doubly harmful.  Not only does the pollution hurt the wildlife inhabiting the stretches of the seashore  but also the youth's education towards conservation is hindered by the frequenting of nature resorts which are continuously polluted.  Therefore, it is extremely important that the authorities keep the beaches clean.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the opinion favored by the argument; the second is an additional piece of evidence which enhances the same conclusion as the former piece of evidence does.

(B) The first is an assumption; the second is a premise which adds information to a previous premise.

(C) The first is a conclusion; the second is an inference based on a previous premise.

(D) The first is a premise; the second is a conclusion based on a previous premise.

(E) The first is the general position of the argument; the second is an additional piece of evidence which stands in apparent contradiction to the previous information.

This is a  CR Butler Question

Check the links to other Butler Projects:
 
  Data Sufficiency Butler  
  Problem Solving Butler  
  Reading Comprehension Butler

dhart · Answer

First we generallt opinion that "Clearly, the pollution of the beaches is doubly harmful". first evudence "Not only does the pollution hurt the wildlife inhabiting the stretches of the seashore" but also , Evdc 2 " the youth's education towards conservation is hindered by the frequenting of nature resorts which are continuously polluted." Conclus "Therefore, it is extremely important that the authorities keep the beaches clean." So (A) The first is the general opinion favored by the argument; the second is an additional piece of evidence which enhances the same conclusion as the former piece of evidence does.imo

ShresthKhandelwal · Answer

The first one is a claim or opinion given in the argument. Then the argument shifted towards the first supporting point (premise/evidence) showing why beach pollution is harmful. Then second boldface provides the second parallel piece of evidence pointing to the same harmful effect. This follows the main conclusion and a solution to the problem.

Vivek1707 · Answer

A. Yup this works. The first boldface gives the argument's  main position : pollution is doubly harmful. The second gives  another reason  supporting that position: it also harms youth's conservation education. Both point in the same direction.
B. The first is not an assumption. It's an  explicit claim  made by the author. Eliminate
C. The first is a conclusion/position, but the second isn't an inference. It's simply  additional evidence  supporting it.
D. The first isn't just a premise; it's an intermediate conclusion. The second is also evidence, not a conclusion.
E. The second boldface doesn't contradict the first. It adds another way in which pollution is harmful.

Bunuel · Answer

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Clearly, the pollution of the beaches is doubly harmful.  Not only does the pollution hurt the wildlife inhabiting the stretches of the seashore  but also the youth's education towards conservation is hindered by the frequenting of nature resorts which are continuously polluted.  Therefore, it is extremely important that the authorities keep the beaches clean.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the opinion favored by the argument; the second is an additional piece of evidence which enhances the same conclusion as the former piece of evidence does.

This is a Boldface Type question, in which you are required to define the role of the two boldface sections in the argument. Read the argument and break it down using indicative words: 
 
  Sentences 1, the first boldface portion, is a conclusion because states an opinion and begins with the conclusion word clearly. 
 
  The first half of sentence 2 is a premise, a matter-of-fact statement contributing to the conclusion. 
 
  The second half of sentence 2, which is the second boldface portion, is also a premise, which also contributes to the conclusion. 
 
  Sentence 3 is a conclusion, as it is a recommendation and begins with the conclusion conjunction therefore.

The first boldfaced expresses the position of the argument, where the second is the second premise, which combines with the first premise to support the argument's position/conclusion.

(B) The first is an assumption; the second is a premise which adds information to a previous premise.

Incorrect.

This is a Boldface Type question, in which you are required to define the role of the two boldface sections in the argument. Read the argument and break it down using indicative words: 
 
  Sentences 1, the first boldface portion, is a conclusion because states an opinion and begins with the conclusion word clearly. 
 
  The first half of sentence 2 is a premise, a matter-of-fact statement contributing to the conclusion. 
 
  The second half of sentence 2, which is the second boldface portion, is also a premise, which also contributes to the conclusion. 
 
  Sentence 3 is a conclusion, as it is a recommendation and begins with the conclusion conjunction therefore.

Pollution being doubly harmful is presented as an opinion, as indicated by the conclusion word clearly. You can immediately eliminate answer choices that incorrectly define the first boldface part; do not waste time reading the rest.

(C) The first is a conclusion; the second is an inference based on a previous premise.

Incorrect.

While this answer choice defines the first boldface part correctly, it defines the second incorrectly. The second piece cannot by any means be an inference (conclusion) since it presents new information which is not based on other data.

(D) The first is a premise; the second is a conclusion based on a previous premise.

Incorrect.

The first boldface portion is not a premise, as it is based on the following data presented (and includes the conclusion word clearly). You can immediately eliminate answer choices that incorrectly define the first boldface part; do not waste time reading the rest.

(E) The first is the general position of the argument; the second is an additional piece of evidence which stands in apparent contradiction to the previous information.

Incorrect.

While this answer choice defines the first boldface part correctly, it defines the second incorrectly. The fact that youth's education is harmed by going to polluted beaches does not contradict the fact that pollution hurts the wildlife, but rather strengthens the position that pollution is doubly harmful. Notice the opening of the sentence: not only... but also prepares us for two facts which add force to each other.

Clearly, the pollution of the beaches is doubly harmful. Not only

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Clearly, the pollution of the beaches is doubly harmful. Not only

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards