Hi Hellohello007,Good catch, and this is exactly the kind of overlap worth untangling. The phrase "plant species other than cranberries" shows up in both, but it is doing a
completely different job in A than in B.
Look at
what each choice is ultimately about - i.e., what gets pollinated in the conclusion:
(A) ends with "...less efficient at pollinating
any one of those species." The thing being pollinated here is the whole
wide variety of species. That is the broad part. The passage only ever commits to a claim about
cranberries - it never tells us how well either bee pollinates all those other flowers. So A's
outcome reaches past what the passage supports.
(B) ends with "...the efficiency with which the bee pollinates
cranberries." The outcome stays locked on cranberries - exactly what the passage is about. The "other species" appears only as the
cause, not the outcome.
That is the key: in B, "plant species other than cranberries" is the
input (how many different species the bee bounces around visiting), and the passage explicitly uses that input to explain the efficiency gap - bumblebees are better
because they stick to few species. So B isn't broadening the conclusion; it's just naming the causal factor the passage already gave you.
Quick way to feel the difference - watch where each sentence lands:"Visiting lots of other flowers makes a bee worse at pollinating
cranberries." - stays in scope (this is B).
"Visiting lots of other flowers makes a bee worse at pollinating
each of those flowers too." - jumps out of scope (this is A).
Same opening words, but only the second one makes a claim the passage never backs up. "Too broad" is about
what the conclusion covers, not about whether the words "other species" appear.
Answer: BHellohello007
Hi you rejected A for being too broad
but then, B also says plant species
other than cranberry, meaning it is also speaking about species which are not cranberry, as in all those, so isnt this too broad as well?