Country A and B are trying to get more tourist in their country.
country A= 2500 violent crime rates
country B= 10,000 violent crime rates.
c-B uses this states to attract more tourist to their country and claim that they have lower crime rate than A.
for their conclusion they are assuming that both have same population and because of that A has higher rate so A has higher rate than B.
A this talks about repeat offenders but thats not real point here. out.
B this talks about particular crime is higher in B than A. but overall they have lower num than A. so this still doest help B.
C so if the population in A is significantly higher than B. then the total num of crime shows the different reality but crime rate will be completely different in both country. so this does enough to attack B's reasoning.say A has 200k and crimes = 2500. crime rate= 1.25% whereas B= 10k, crimes= 1000, crime rate = 10%. keep.
D may be thats why they used the described strategy to draw more tourist. out.
E who care. criminals dont need to know about condition of prison to commit crimes. they are not looking for fancy environment to live for free by committing crime. out.
option C
Bunuel
Countries A and B are in competition to draw tourists to their countries. In Country A, about 2,500 violent crimes are reported per year. In Country B, about 1,000 violent crimes are reported per year. Trying to draw tourists away from Country A, officials in Country B use these violent crime statistics to claim it has a lower violent crime rate than Country A.
Which of the following, if true, would expose the flaw in Country B's argument that it has the lower violent crime rate?
A. Most violent criminals in Country B are repeat offenders.
B. White-collar crime is higher in Country B than in Country A.
C. The population of Country A is 20 times greater than the population of Country B.
D. Country B has fewer tourists than Country A.
E. Country A has a better prison system than Country B.