Hi! Great question about the testing strategy. Let me clarify why this approach is actually
systematic, not luck.Key Insight: When using the testing method to eliminate wrong answers, you don't need to find ALL factors - you just need
ONE example that doesn't have a particular factor to eliminate that choice.
Why 21 works well:• A =
21 gives us A2 - B2 =
212 -
122 =
297•
297 =
3 ×
99 =
3 ×
9 ×
11• This immediately eliminates options containing
5 (choices A, B, C, D)
The smart testing strategy:1. Pick numbers that avoid
5 and
0 in the digits (like
21,
31,
42)
2. This ensures the result won't be divisible by
5, helping eliminate multiple choices at once
3. Since choices A through D all contain
5 as a factor, one good test case eliminates them all!
General principle: For "which is ALWAYS a factor" questions, test with values that
avoid the factors in wrong answer choices. This makes elimination faster.
Note that the algebraic approach (A2 - B2 =
99(a+b)(a-b)) is more reliable, but smart testing can be equally fast in certain questions when you understand the strategy!
Answer: Enyadavalwar
Although this is definitely a fast approach, it seems like pure luck. The algebraic approach only took 30-40 seconds, and I think if we go down guessing from such vast combinations, we will waste more time.
Did you make a calculated guess of putting 21? If yes, then please explain, it'd be helpful