nyadavalwar
Although this is definitely a fast approach, it seems like pure luck. The algebraic approach only took 30-40 seconds, and I think if we go down guessing from such vast combinations, we will waste more time.
Did you make a calculated guess of putting 21? If yes, then please explain, it'd be helpful
No, I didn't make a calculated guess by starting with 21.
I chose that number because 21 and 12 result in pretty small numbers when squared.
Let's try 31 and 13
31² - 13² = 792
792 = (2)(2)(2)(3)(3)(11)
Looks like only 99 works here as well.
What about 32² - 23² = 495
495 = (5)(9)(11)
This time A, B, C and E work (which means I'd have to go back and test another pair of values)
So, sometimes testing answer choices will yield the correct answer immediately, and other times it won't.
Keep in mind that, when it comes to answering GMAT questions, the best approach is the fastest approach.
If you have the mindset that testing answer choices is an inferior approach, you'll miss out on an important strategy.
Cheers,
Brent