Robo_123
I am unable to understand this. Can someone please elaborate?
We only need to be concerned with the answers, so we can check each of them individually. But rather than checking the answers themselves, we can check their factors because all the factors of a number, n, must divide some other number, m, in order for n to divide m. Example: if 5 does not divide some number, then it is impossible for 10 to divide that number.
So let's start with rewriting all of the numbers for each answer as their prime factorization:
a) 29 (prime)
b) 2 * 3 * 5
c) 31 (prime)
d) 2 * 19
e) 41 (prime)
Let's start by checking the smallest prime numbers first, because they will be easier to calculate. 2 must divide some q^2 - 5 because it is present in multiple answers and there must be a single correct answer, so we can ignore 2. The next smallest number is 3.
Explanation using Modular Arithmetic:
In the modular space of 3, there are 3 possible values: 0, 1, 2. So these are the only relevant values of q so far as divisibility by 3 is concerned. If q is 0, q^2 - 5 is 1 (mod 3). If q is 1, q^2 - 5 is 2 (mod 3). if q is 2, q^2 - 5 is 2 (mod 3). Of all 3 possibilities, none are 0, so q^2 - 5 must never be divisible by 3. Thus the answer has to be b) 30.
Explanation using Remainders:
There are 3 possibilities for the number q: Either q is divisible by 3, q is one less than a number divisible by 3, or q is two less than a number divisible by 3. In other words, q takes one of these three forms ONLY: 3k, 3k - 1, 3k - 2. If we square these (q ^2) we get:
9k^2 -> 3c,
9k^2 - 6k + 1 -> 3c + 1,
9k^2 - 12k + 4 -> 3c + 4 -> 3c + 1
So q^2 is either a multiple of 3, or 1 more than a multiple of 3. A multiple of 3 minus 5 is never a multiple of 3. One more than a multiple of 3 minus 5 is the same as a multiple of 3 minus 4, so it is never a multiple of 3. Therefore, q^2 - 5 can never be a multiple of 3, so it can also never be a multiple of 30. The answer must be b) 30.