Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 17:55 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 17:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
shivanigs
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Last visit: 17 Aug 2016
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
251
 [10]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 06-11-2013
GPA: 3.5
WE:Marketing (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Posts: 55
Kudos: 251
 [10]
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
810,870
 [6]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
EvaJager
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 513
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
WE:Science (Education)
Posts: 513
Kudos: 2,370
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
mandyrhtdm
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Last visit: 09 Mar 2013
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-30-2012
GPA: 3.08
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 51
Kudos: 177
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shivanigs
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|

The solution already mentioned is a very novel one, it uses the basic definition of Modulus
|a| = distance of point a from Origin that is (0) or (0,0) or (0,0,0) where a can be anything rational, irrational, real or even imaginary.
and some times we spend lots of time in solving the questions algebraically, simplifying the expressions when they can be very easily done if we spend a lil more time understanding the question.
IN Most of the problems in algebra we can narrow down to the range of answer if we define the range and domain of all the functions involved in that expression.

In this example if you are not able to remember what the modulus of a number means you can always use the basic rule that
|a| < |b| implies ....... -|b| < a<|b|

apply it to both the options.
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,809
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 679
Posts: 1,809
Kudos: 2,090
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

--------r--s------t---- (answer NO);
----s--r----------t---- (answer YES).

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

Answer: B.
small query
I am used to the general perception that if there is Mod on both sides of the equation then we have 2 cases

1) Both the sides of the equation have the same sign or 2) Both the sides have opposite signs

using the same logic here for statement 2 --> |r -s | > |s - t|.
I thought we could write this as r-s >s-t -->r+t>2s case 1

or

r-s>-s+t --> case 2 ( both the sides opposite signs ) which gives r>t
so if r>t then statement 2 is also satisfied , but here we have nothing about s
so I thought if r>t then statement 2 is also insufficient , as there is nothing about s. what is the flaw here?

why cannot we have r-s>-s+t and hence r>t for statement 2 ?
Thank you
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,809
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 679
Posts: 1,809
Kudos: 2,090
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can any body help with this query of mine, thank you
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stne
Bunuel
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

--------r--s------t---- (answer NO);
----s--r----------t---- (answer YES).

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

Answer: B.
small query
I am used to the general perception that if there is Mod on both sides of the equation then we have 2 cases

1) Both the sides of the equation have the same sign or 2) Both the sides have opposite signs

using the same logic here for statement 2 --> |r -s | > |s - t|.
I thought we could write this as r-s >s-t -->r+t>2s case 1

or

r-s>-s+t --> case 2 ( both the sides opposite signs ) which gives r>t
so if r>t then statement 2 is also satisfied , but here we have nothing about s
so I thought if r>t then statement 2 is also insufficient , as there is nothing about s. what is the flaw here?

why cannot we have r-s>-s+t and hence r>t for statement 2 ?
Thank you

Not a good way to solve this problem.

What is the question you are trying to answer there?
When you say that r-s and s-t have the same/opposite signs, what cases you'd have?
User avatar
Ravithj
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Last visit: 28 Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
9
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 7
Kudos: 9
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1 ) In the number line,is R between S and T ?
a.) |r-s|<|r-t|
b.)|r-s|>|s-t|
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
810,870
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ravithj
1 ) In the number line,is R between S and T ?
a.) |r-s|<|r-t|
b.)|r-s|>|s-t|

Merging similar topics. Please refer to the discussion above.

Also, please read carefully and follow: rules-for-posting-please-read-this-before-posting-133935.html Pay attention to rules 3 and 7. Thank you.
User avatar
akshayk
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Last visit: 21 Sep 2020
Posts: 271
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 271
Kudos: 424
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shivanigs
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|

Great Question on the core definition of absolute values.
s---r---t or t----r----s ?

1) |r-s| < |r-t|
Distance b/w r & s is less than the distance b/w r & t.
r--s-------t -> No
s-r------t -> Yes
Insufficient.

2) |r-s| > |s-t|
Distance between r & s is greater than the distance b/w s & t
=> r cannot be between s & t.
Sufficient.

B is the answer.
avatar
AbhinavBankhwal
Joined: 30 Jun 2017
Last visit: 16 May 2018
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Posts: 13
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

--------r--s------t---- (answer NO);
----s--r----------t---- (answer YES).

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

There can be no easier explanation than this. Thanks!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shivanigs
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|

Similar questions:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-s-between ... 92599.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-s-between ... 92600.html
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 8,628
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,628
Kudos: 5,190
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shivanigs
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|

#1
we get |r -s| < |r - t|
t>s
s+t>2r
relation btwn r & t not know

so r....s......t or s...t....r

insufficient
#2
|r -s| > |s - t|
2s>t+r
r>t
so we can say that
t....r....s ; sufficient
IMO B
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,964
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,964
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
498 posts
212 posts