Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 20:18 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 20:18
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
iGMATUSA
Joined: 23 Sep 2012
Last visit: 11 Jan 2013
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
8
 [8]
Posts: 1
Kudos: 8
 [8]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,754
Own Kudos:
810,679
 [6]
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,754
Kudos: 810,679
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
abhishekkpv
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Last visit: 04 Jun 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
159
 [2]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 04-21-2013
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Internet and New Media)
Posts: 25
Kudos: 159
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
craky
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Last visit: 29 Jan 2013
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
323
 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
Location: Prague
Concentration: Finance
Schools:University of Economics Prague
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38
Posts: 101
Kudos: 323
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Both sentences are telling you that the chance of a positive outcome is 20% in a given year. To win in at least one year out of two is the same as calculating (1 - not winning at all) = (1- 0.8*0.8).
avatar
Vijayeta
Joined: 14 Jan 2014
Last visit: 24 May 2016
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 8
Kudos: 274
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel Can you please explain it.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,045
 [2]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,045
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

This DS question tests your knowledge of the 'concept' of Probability, without actually requiring that you do any math.

We're told that a student is entering a college housing lottery for 2 consecutive years. We're asked for the probability that the student receives housing through the lottery for AT LEAST 1 of these years?

To answer this question we need to know either the probability of getting housing in each of the 2 years OR the probability of NOT getting housing in each of the 2 years.

1) Eighty percent of the students in the lottery do not receive housing through the lottery in any given year.

This fact tells us that 80% of students do NOT get housing in ANY given year, meaning that the probability of getting housing is the SAME each year. Knowing that 80% DON'T get housing means that 20% DO get housing. Thus, we COULD calculate the probability of getting housing at least once in 2 years (but we don't have to).
Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT.

2) Each year, 1 of 5 students receives housing through the lottery.

This Fact tells us the exact SAME information that Fact 1 did - 20% get housing. We already know that Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT, so Fact 2 is also (for the same reason).
Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT

Final Answer:
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
msk0657
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 26 Nov 2012
Last visit: 14 Feb 2020
Posts: 455
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 455
Kudos: 569
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A student is entered in a college housing lottery for 2 consecutive years. what is the probability that the student receives housing through the lottery for at least 1 of these years?

(1) 80% of the students in the lottery do not receive housing through the lottery in any given year.

(2) Each year 1 in 5 students receives housing through the lottery.

Stat 1: Probability that don't receive the lottery is 80/100 => 4/5

Now probability that will receive the lottery is 1-4/5 =? 1/5...Sufficient.

Stat 2: 1/5...Sufficient..

IMO option d.
avatar
testprepabc
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Last visit: 08 Oct 2016
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 20
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A student is entered in a college housing lottery for 2 consecutive years. what is the probability that the student receives housing through the lottery for at least 1 of these years?

(1) 80% of the students in the lottery do not receive housing through the lottery in any given year.

(2) Each year 1 in 5 students receives housing through the lottery.

There are 4 possible scenarios: Y1,Y2; Y1,N2; N1,Y2; N1,N2 (Y1 = Got housing in year 1, N1 = Didnt get in year 1, etc)
To calculate "at least 1 of these" = 1-[(N1)(N2)]

Statement 1: N=80% = 4/5
so, 1-(4/5)(4/5) = 9/25

Statement 2: essentially says the exact thing as statement 1.

So, Option D.

Hope it helps :)
avatar
Akuthiala
Joined: 23 Jun 2016
Last visit: 18 Oct 2016
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 34
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I believe the answer is A

Statement 1: 20% of students "in" the lottery will get housing. So we can find the probability
Statement 2: say 1 in 5 receives housing through the lottery but doesn't say how many apply for the lottery. I meant it to read that if they are 10 students 2 get housing from the lottery but the students that apply could be 2,3,4, or 5 so insufficient
avatar
testprepabc
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Last visit: 08 Oct 2016
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 20
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Akuthiala
I believe the answer is A

Statement 1: 20% of students "in" the lottery will get housing. So we can find the probability
Statement 2: say 1 in 5 receives housing through the lottery but doesn't say how many apply for the lottery. I meant it to read that if they are 10 students 2 get housing from the lottery but the students that apply could be 2,3,4, or 5 so insufficient
20% = 20/100 = 1/5
Statement 1 & 2 are the same except for the way of saying it.
Also, by the same logic that you applied to discard S2, we can discard S1 as well. Let's say 4students applied. @0% of 4 is 0.8, which can't be the number of students.
It is a must to note here that 20% and 1/5 do not represent a number that will apply on every number in the possible set, as in, not every fifth student gets the room. S1 presents the fact in % terms, while S2 can be said to have mentioned the same in terms of probability.

Hope it helps :)
User avatar
deepthit
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Last visit: 29 Apr 2023
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 129
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 104
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
its D

Both statements are sufficient individually to determine the probability for 1 year
avatar
Akuthiala
Joined: 23 Jun 2016
Last visit: 18 Oct 2016
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 34
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
testprepabc
Akuthiala
I believe the answer is A

Statement 1: 20% of students "in" the lottery will get housing. So we can find the probability
Statement 2: say 1 in 5 receives housing through the lottery but doesn't say how many apply for the lottery. I meant it to read that if they are 10 students 2 get housing from the lottery but the students that apply could be 2,3,4, or 5 so insufficient
20% = 20/100 = 1/5
Statement 1 & 2 are the same except for the way of saying it.
Also, by the same logic that you applied to discard S2, we can discard S1 as well. Let's say 4students applied. @0% of 4 is 0.8, which can't be the number of students.
It is a must to note here that 20% and 1/5 do not represent a number that will apply on every number in the possible set, as in, not every fifth student gets the room. S1 presents the fact in % terms, while S2 can be said to have mentioned the same in terms of probability.

Hope it helps :)

Saying 1/5 students "in" the lottery receives housing from lottery and saying 1/5 students receive housing from lottery are two different statements. the first one says that for every 5 people in the lottery 1 gets housing (so we can calculate probability) the second states that 1 in 5 of total students in the lottery or outside the lottery receive housing from lottery. and it doesn't state that all students enter the lottery
avatar
testprepabc
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Last visit: 08 Oct 2016
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 20
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Akuthiala

Saying 1/5 students "in" the lottery receives housing from lottery and saying 1/5 students receive housing from lottery are two different statements. the first one says that for every 5 people in the lottery 1 gets housing (so we can calculate probability) the second states that 1 in 5 of total students in the lottery or outside the lottery receive housing from lottery. and it doesn't state that all students enter the lottery
OK, so you were asking something completely different. Sorry I didn't get that earlier.
In questions such as these (P&C), rarely(if any, at all) you are allowed to bring external information. Some set theory question allow bringing in of additional info.
Here, for example and as per my understanding, if the college has 100 students, all 100 are participating in the lottery. Unless and until explicitly mentioned, or hinted by the options, you should not think that a certain number of students are not participating.
This can be clarified only when the OA is published.
User avatar
MahmoudFawzy
Joined: 27 Oct 2018
Last visit: 20 Feb 2021
Posts: 660
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 200
Status:Manager
Location: Egypt
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.67
WE:Pharmaceuticals (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 660
Kudos: 2,174
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please Bunuel

I solved this question incorrect, and I want to understand why my rationale is wrong.

I chose A.
I thought that statement 2 is insufficient because we don't know the probability that a student receives a housing lottery in both years.
I tried to apply: (probability of year 1 + probability of year 2) - Both + Neither = 1 ---> (and what is between brackets is what we should calculate)
I draw a tables, where the green area is what to calculate.

Statement 1: it is clear that the green area is 20%, so probability is \(\frac{1}{5}\)
Attachment:
Untitled.png
Untitled.png [ 2.34 KiB | Viewed 5636 times ]
statement 2: I thought that the green area could range between 20% to 40%, so insufficient.
Attachment:
Untitled2.png
Untitled2.png [ 9.67 KiB | Viewed 5630 times ]
I wish my question is clear,
Thanks in Advance.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,965
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,965
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109754 posts
498 posts
212 posts