Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 20:59 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 20:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatbull
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Last visit: 04 Feb 2018
Posts: 332
Own Kudos:
2,745
 [3]
Given Kudos: 20
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Posts: 332
Kudos: 2,745
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
810,883
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,883
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
qlx
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Last visit: 12 Feb 2016
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 61
Kudos: 293
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,883
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
qlx
using 1+2

Account has 0$ initially then 500 *6 -300 *2 - 400*2 = 1600 so 6+2+2 = 10
what if worker had already 500$ in the account initially
Then

500 +500*5 -300*2 -400*2= 1600 here we have 5+2+2 = 9 transactions

So I am getting E.

Please point out my mistake. Should be assume that there was 0$ in the account initially.

The initial amount does NOT matter.

We are told that at the end of last week, the amount in the worker’s account was $1,600 more than at the beginning of the week.

Your example does not work: 500*5 - 300*2 - 400*2 = 1100, not 1600.
avatar
qlx
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Last visit: 12 Feb 2016
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 61
Kudos: 293
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
qlx
using 1+2

Account has 0$ initially then 500 *6 -300 *2 - 400*2 = 1600 so 6+2+2 = 10
what if worker had already 500$ in the account initially
Then

500 +500*5 -300*2 -400*2= 1600 here we have 5+2+2 = 9 transactions

So I am getting E.

Please point out my mistake. Should be assume that there was 0$ in the account initially.

The initial amount does NOT matter.

We are told that at the end of last week, the amount in the worker’s account was $1,600 more than at the beginning of the week.

Your example does not work: 500*5 - 300*2 - 400*2 = 1100, not 1600.

forgive me , still not able to comprehend

At the beginning of the week he could have had 500 then make deposits of 500 *5 and withdrawals 300*2 and 400*2

So 500 + 500*5 -300*2 -400 *2 =1600

Sorry but where does it say that at the beginning of the week he had $0, or the Difference between the beginning and end of the week of $1600 was done only through transactions . He could still have 500$ on Monday and then make further deposits of 500 * 5 through the week , and withdraw 300 *2 and 400*2 through the week.

In this case also amount at the end of the week will be 1600$ more than at the beginning of the week but he would have done only 9 transactions.( as he already had $500 on Monday , he did not deposit that through any transaction that week).

Thank you for your understanding.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
810,883
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,883
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
qlx
Bunuel
qlx
using 1+2

Account has 0$ initially then 500 *6 -300 *2 - 400*2 = 1600 so 6+2+2 = 10
what if worker had already 500$ in the account initially
Then

500 +500*5 -300*2 -400*2= 1600 here we have 5+2+2 = 9 transactions

So I am getting E.

Please point out my mistake. Should be assume that there was 0$ in the account initially.

The initial amount does NOT matter.

We are told that at the end of last week, the amount in the worker’s account was $1,600 more than at the beginning of the week.

Your example does not work: 500*5 - 300*2 - 400*2 = 1100, not 1600.

forgive me , still not able to comprehend

At the beginning of the week he could have had 500 then make deposits of 500 *5 and withdrawals 300*2 and 400*2

So 500 + 500*5 -300*2 -400 *2 =1600

Sorry but where does it say that at the beginning of the week he had $0, or the Difference between the beginning and end of the week of $1600 was done only through transactions . He could still have 500$ on Monday and then make further deposits of 500 * 5 through the week , and withdraw 300 *2 and 400*2 through the week.

In this case also amount at the end of the week will be 1600$ more than at the beginning of the week but he would have done only 9 transactions.( as he already had $500 on Monday , he did not deposit that through any transaction that week).

Thank you for your understanding.

If initially he had $500, then after 500*5 - 300*2 - 400 *2 he would have $1600, which is only $1100 more than the initial amount of $500, not $1600 more. Again initial amount does not matter it could have been $0, $500, $1000000000, ...
avatar
qlx
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Last visit: 12 Feb 2016
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 61
Kudos: 293
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
qlx

forgive me , still not able to comprehend

At the beginning of the week he could have had 500 then make deposits of 500 *5 and withdrawals 300*2 and 400*2

So 500 + 500*5 -300*2 -400 *2 =1600

Sorry but where does it say that at the beginning of the week he had $0, or the Difference between the beginning and end of the week of $1600 was done only through transactions . He could still have 500$ on Monday and then make further deposits of 500 * 5 through the week , and withdraw 300 *2 and 400*2 through the week.

In this case also amount at the end of the week will be 1600$ more than at the beginning of the week but he would have done only 9 transactions.( as he already had $500 on Monday , he did not deposit that through any transaction that week).

Thank you for your understanding.

If initially he had $500, then after 500*5 - 300*2 - 400 *2 he would have $1600, which is only $1100 more than the initial amount of $500, not $1600 more. Again initial amount does not matter it could have been $0, $500, $1000000000, ...

Thanks for not giving up on me, finally got it.
avatar
mohsint25
Joined: 08 Dec 2014
Last visit: 12 Mar 2025
Posts: 17
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GRE 1: Q165 V165
GPA: 3.1
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GRE 1: Q165 V165
Posts: 17
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If he deposited 5 times, so if he deposited 5*$500=$2,500, then he withdrawn $900, we cannot break $900 so that to have withdrawals of both $300 and $400.

Hi,
i have been thinking about this but couldnt understand it.

the question says "the amount is $16000 more than" not "exactly $16000". Therefore, in the above mentioned example if he withdrew $300*1 and $400*1 ($700) he would be left left $1800$. which makes it sufficient and hence the answer E.

Any help will he highly appreciated.

thanks
User avatar
Konstantin1983
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Last visit: 08 Dec 2021
Posts: 298
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 353
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE:Sales (Telecommunications)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Posts: 298
Kudos: 324
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mohsint25
If he deposited 5 times, so if he deposited 5*$500=$2,500, then he withdrawn $900, we cannot break $900 so that to have withdrawals of both $300 and $400.

Hi,
i have been thinking about this but couldnt understand it.

the question says "the amount is $16000 more than" not "exactly $16000". Therefore, in the above mentioned example if he withdrew $300*1 and $400*1 ($700) he would be left left $1800$. which makes it sufficient and hence the answer E.

Any help will he highly appreciated.

thanks
Hi mohsint25!
Your explanation is not correct. First, the amount is 1600, not 16000 as you wrote. Second, please read statement 2 again. It says "1600 more than.." and that means that we have exact figure - 1600. This is not the same as "more than 1600". If this had been the case your explanation would have been correct. Hope it is clear.
avatar
mohsint25
Joined: 08 Dec 2014
Last visit: 12 Mar 2025
Posts: 17
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GRE 1: Q165 V165
GPA: 3.1
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GRE 1: Q165 V165
Posts: 17
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for the explanation . I confused 1600 more than with more than 1600
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,063
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,063
Kudos: 20,000
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

A worker’s account activities consist of three types of transactions—deposits of $500 and withdrawals of either $300 or $400. Last week, did the worker have at least ten account transactions?

(1) Last week the worker had at least one of each of the three types of transactions.
(2) At the end of last week, the amount in the worker’s account was $1,600 more than at the beginning of the week.

This is a frequently tested question in nowadays Chinese math. Looking at the original condition, there are 3 variables (x,y,z) if we let x be the no. of deposits of $500, y for that of $300, and z for $400. We will therefore need 3 equations to match the numbers, but there are only 2 equations given from the 2 conditions, so (E) is likely to be our answer.
Looking at them in detail, x=6, y=2, z=2 and the answer to the question becomes ‘yes’, and this condition is sufficient. In other words, 500*6-300*2-400*2=1,600 and 6+2+2=10.
But for condition 2, the answer is ‘yes’ for x=6, y=z=2, but ‘no’ for x=4, y=0, z=1. So this condition is insufficient, and the answer becomes (C).

For cases where we need 3 more equation, such as original conditions with “3 variables”, or “4 variables and 1 equation”, or “5 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 80% chance that E is the answer (especially about 90% of 2 by 2 questions where there are more than 3 variables), while C has 15% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since E is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or D.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
498 posts
212 posts