Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 08:47 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 08:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,928
Own Kudos:
811,568
 [5]
Given Kudos: 105,914
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,928
Kudos: 811,568
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,384
Own Kudos:
5,236
 [4]
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,384
Kudos: 5,236
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
RatneshS
Joined: 14 May 2014
Last visit: 13 Jul 2017
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 296
Location: India
Schools: Mannheim"17
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.44
Schools: Mannheim"17
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V31
Posts: 49
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,384
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,384
Kudos: 5,236
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RatneshS
Vyshak
St1: |x| > z --> Not Sufficient as we do not have information about y

St2: z > y --> Not sufficient as we do not have information about x

Combining St1 and St2: |x| > z > y
Let x = 3, z = 2, y = 1 --> Are x and y both less than z? No
Let x = -3, z = 2, y = 1 --> Are x and y both less than z? Yes
The main culprit here is that x can be either positive or negative
Not Sufficient

Answer: E

Why is B not the answer?
question is is x<z and y<z

B says that y>z
which means that the answer of the question is No. why do we care about x?
suppose x>z or x<z...our conclusion still holds the same.

Please acknowledge

Hi,

St2 states that z > y. You have not interpreted the statement correctly. We need additional information about 'x' for St2 to be sufficient.
User avatar
unverifiedvoracity
Joined: 12 Jan 2016
Last visit: 14 Aug 2017
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 71
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:Supply Chain Management (Consumer Electronics)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 56
Kudos: 80
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
RatneshS
Vyshak
St1: |x| > z --> Not Sufficient as we do not have information about y

St2: z > y --> Not sufficient as we do not have information about x

Combining St1 and St2: |x| > z > y
Let x = 3, z = 2, y = 1 --> Are x and y both less than z? No
Let x = -3, z = 2, y = 1 --> Are x and y both less than z? Yes
The main culprit here is that x can be either positive or negative
Not Sufficient

Answer: E

Why is B not the answer?
question is is x<z and y<z

B says that y>z
which means that the answer of the question is No. why do we care about x?
suppose x>z or x<z...our conclusion still holds the same.

Please acknowledge

Hi,

St2 states that z > y. You have not interpreted the statement correctly. We need additional information about 'x' for St2 to be sufficient.

But it doesn't matter. Even if x<z, Statement 2 is sufficient to say both x and y are NOT less than z.

I would go with B as well.
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,384
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,384
Kudos: 5,236
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
unverifiedvoracity


But it doesn't matter. Even if x<z, Statement 2 is sufficient to say both x and y are NOT less than z.

I would go with B as well.

Question asks whether both x and y are less than z i.e. whether x < z and y < z?

Lets look at St2: z > y --> Its as good as saying y < z
Now we know that y < z but is x < z? We don't know that.

If y < z and x < z then yes both x and y are < z
If y < z and x > z then no both x and y are not < z
Hence St2 is insufficient.
User avatar
unverifiedvoracity
Joined: 12 Jan 2016
Last visit: 14 Aug 2017
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 71
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:Supply Chain Management (Consumer Electronics)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 56
Kudos: 80
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
unverifiedvoracity


But it doesn't matter. Even if x<z, Statement 2 is sufficient to say both x and y are NOT less than z.

I would go with B as well.

Question asks whether both x and y are less than z i.e. whether x < z and y < z?

Lets look at St2: z > y --> Its as good as saying y < z
Now we know that y < z but is x < z? We don't know that.

If y < z and x < z then yes both x and y are < z
If y < z and x > z then no both x and y are not < z
Hence St2 is insufficient.

my bad. I misread statement 2, I thought it was y > z. Thanks for clarifying.
User avatar
merajul
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Last visit: 10 Feb 2024
Posts: 128
Own Kudos:
40
 [1]
Given Kudos: 229
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Date: 07-23-2015
GMAT 1: 580 Q41 V28
GPA: 3.8
WE:Project Management (Energy)
GMAT 1: 580 Q41 V28
Posts: 128
Kudos: 40
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If x, y, and z are integers, are x and y both less than z?

(1) |x|>z
(2) z > y

(1) ---- |x| > z

=> x > z or
-x > z
=>x < -z. Thus -z > x > z. Further value of y not known. NOT Sufficient

(2) value of x not know. NOT Sufficient

(1) + (2), x has two values. NOT Sufficient
E
User avatar
smui0603
Joined: 11 Jun 2023
Last visit: 29 Feb 2024
Posts: 2
GMAT 1: 700 Q45 V40
GMAT 1: 700 Q45 V40
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why is the answer not A (Statement 1 alone is sufficient)? Since we know that x > z, and that is enough to decide that x and y are not both less than z, regardless of what y is. Since x > z and y < z, the answer would be no, and if x > z and y > z, the answer would also be no.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,928
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,914
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,928
Kudos: 811,568
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
smui0603
Why is the answer not A (Statement 1 alone is sufficient)? Since we know that x > z, and that is enough to decide that x and y are not both less than z, regardless of what y is. Since x > z and y < z, the answer would be no, and if x > z and y > z, the answer would also be no.

(1) says that |x| > z, implying the absolute value of x is greater than z, not x > z. Thus, there can be a case where x < z. For instance, consider x = -10 and y = 1.

Hope it helps.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109928 posts
498 posts
212 posts