eantolovic
Hello Brent,
I appreciate your logic in answering this question; however, I am struggling on a fundamental necessity in order to make this true. Statement (1) declares "Yesterday, John spent less than $25 at the store." It doesn't say what he spent that money on, whether it was CD's, records, or candy at the register.
Therefore, we cannot determine whether he bought 6 records, 5 records and some candy, or none at all. On behalf of this logic I can only surmise that Statement (1) is insufficient evidence in order to answer "Yesterday, did John buy more than 5 records at this store?"
Statement (2) would also be insufficient since we are still unaware whether John bought more than 5 records.
Since Statements (1) & (2) are insufficient, we can now determine if they can be combined. If (1) states John spent less than $25, and (2) states John bought at least 1 CD, then we now know for sure that John wouldn't have enough remaining funds to buy those 5 rad vinyls on display. Therefore, and according to this line of reasoning, the answer would be
.
Be careful. The part in blue above is not correct.
While we may not know exactly what was purchased, we can be certain that John did NOT buy 6 records (because that would cost more than $25)
We can also be certain that John did NOT buy 7 records (because that would cost more than $25)
We can also be certain that John did NOT buy 8 records (because that would cost more than $25)
We can also be certain that John did NOT buy 9 records (because that would cost more than $25)
We can also be certain that John did NOT buy 10 records (because that would cost more than $25)
.....etc
So, even though we have no idea what John purchased, we can be 100% that John did NOT buy 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, (etc) records.
In other words, we can definitively answer the target question with a resounding "NO"
Does that help?
Cheers,
Brent