Last visit was: 30 Apr 2026, 23:43 It is currently 30 Apr 2026, 23:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 30 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,988
Own Kudos:
812,183
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,966
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,988
Kudos: 812,183
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
LevanKhukhunashvili
Joined: 13 Feb 2018
Last visit: 23 Jan 2021
Posts: 369
Own Kudos:
457
 [1]
Given Kudos: 50
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
Posts: 369
Kudos: 457
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 30 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,236
Own Kudos:
45,055
 [1]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,236
Kudos: 45,055
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmat1393
User avatar
Share GMAT Experience Moderator
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 626
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 626
Kudos: 2,634
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is x > y?


(1) -4x + 2y < y - 3x

(2) wx > wy


Upon rearranging statement 1 we get

-x<-y => x>y

Statement 1 is sufficient

from Statement 2 we do not anything about the value of W.So clearly it is insufficient.

Hence A is the Answer.
User avatar
KrishnakumarKA1
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 398
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
Posts: 398
Kudos: 314
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Solution:

To find: x > y?
No other information given in the question stem lets directly analyze the statements!

Analysis of statement 1: \(-4x + 2y < y - 3x\)
Let’s solve the given inequality: \(-4x+2y<y-3x\)
We get \(-4x+3x<y-2y\)
\(-x< -y\)
Multiplying the above inequality by (-1), [The sign of the inequality will swap]
\(x>y\). We get a definite answer as “YES” to the question.
Hence statement 1 is sufficient to answer. We can eliminate options B, C and E.

Analysis of statement 2: \(wx > wy\)
By analyzing the statement 2 we get two cases here,
Case 1: \(wx>wy\)
\(wx-wy>0\);
\(w(x-y)> 0\)
If \(w>0\) ,then \(x-y>0\);this means \(x>y\).
Hence gives definite “yes” to the question.
Case 2: \(wx>wy\)
\(wx-wy>0\);
\(w(x-y)> 0\)
If \(w<0\) ,then \(x-y<0\);this means \(x<y\).
Hence gives definite “no” to the question.
As this statement gives us a contradictory answer, statement 2 is not sufficient to answer. We can eliminate the answer option D.

The correct answer option is “A”.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,488
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,488
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is x > y?

(1) -4x + 2y < y - 3x

(2) wx > wy

Target question: Is x > y?

Statement 1: -4x + 2y < y - 3x
Add 4x to both sides to get: 2y < y + x
Subtract y from both sides to get: y < x
Perfect, the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than y
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: wx > wy
ASIDE: We must resist the temptation to divide both sides of the inequality by w to get: x > y, because we don't know whether w is NEGATIVE or POSITIVE.
If we divide both sides of an inequality by a NEGATIVE number, we must REVERSE the direction of the inequality symbol.
To better understand what I mean, consider the following.
There are several values of w, x and y that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: w = 1, x = 2 and y = 1. Notice that wx = (1)(2) = 2, and wy = (1)(1) = 1, so wx > wy. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than y
Case b: w = -1, x = -2 and y = -1. Notice that wx = (-1)(-2) = 2, and wy = (-1)(-1) = 1, so wx > wy. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, x is NOT greater than y
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

Cheers,
Brent

RELATED VIDEO FROM OUR COURSE
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 39,011
Own Kudos:
Posts: 39,011
Kudos: 1,122
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109988 posts
498 posts
212 posts