Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
15 Aug 2019, 00:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
45% (02:10) correct
55%
(02:26)
wrong
based on 42
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
A line segment parallel to the second-smallest side of a right triangle bisects the smallest side, forming a smaller triangle within the original one. What is the area of the smaller triangle?
(1) The area of the larger triangle is 48.
(2) The length of the line segment is 12.
(1) The area of the larger triangle is 48.
(2) The length of the line segment is 12.
Source: GMAT Free
15 Aug 2019, 07:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
It's easier to see if you draw a diagram, but when we draw the line segment, we'll be creating a new smaller triangle that is similar to the larger triangle. Since we're bisecting a side, each edge is half as long, and the area will be (1/2)^2 = 1/4 as big. So Statement 1 is sufficient - the area of the smaller triangle will be (1/4)(48) = 12. Statement 2 is not sufficient, since while we know the second-longest side of the small triangle is 12, and thus the second-longest side of the big triangle is 24, we don't know anything about the shortest side of either triangle. So the answer is A.
17 Sep 2019, 02:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
SajjadAhmad
Official Explanation
To understand this question, we will draw a right triangle:
We draw one that is very non-isosceles so that there is no confusion about what the smallest and second-smallest sides are. The hypotenuse, as always is the longest side. The left side can be called the height of the triangle and is the smallest side. The base of the triangle is the second-smallest side. The line that we have to add bisects the smallest side:
The "smaller triangle" that the question refers to must be what's labeled here as ABC; it, too, is a right triangle, since BC is parallel to the base of the larger triangle. We want the area of this smaller triangle. On to the data statements, separately first, as always.
Statement (1) gives the area of the larger triangle. Will that be sufficient to get the area of the smaller triangle? It's clear that the height of the smaller triangle is half the height of the larger triangle. There is a more specific relationship between the two triangles, however, since they have identical angles. They are therefore "similar triangles," meaning they have the same shape. Since the side opposite a given angle scales proportionally with that angle, two similar triangles, with identical angles, will have sides of proportional lengths. The upshot is that, since the height of the smaller triangle is half the height of the larger triangle, the base must be half of the base of the larger triangle. Substituting h --> h/2 and b --> b/2 into the area formula indicates that the area of the smaller triangle is 1/2*h/2*b/2 = 1/4(bh/2) , one quarter of the larger triangle. In our diagram, the smaller triangle doesn't quite look that small--could four of them fit inside the larger triangle? Indeed, if we draw the situation accurately we get:
Four triangles in one! If you aren't certain about this conclusion, you might be able to convince yourself by analysis by cases, in fact. Namely, if you can convince yourself that the case above of 4-in-1 triangle configuration is possible, you can conclude that it must entail bisecting the height and the base, and then you can convince yourself that, working the other way, when the height is bisected by a line parallel to the base, the only possible case is the 4-in-1 case. The area of the smaller triangle is a quarter of the larger area, so it must be 12, and we have answered the question. Sufficient.
A further side note: this is actually connected to a way of thinking about the formula for the area of a triangle. It's no coincidence that the formula for the area of a triangle bh/2 is half the formula of a rectangle, bh, in that any triangle can be doubled and converted into a rectangle. For example:
(It's true also for non-right triangles. You can get out your Tangram set and play around with two congruent triangles.)
Statement (2): Knowing the base is insufficient, because we know nothing about the height of the smaller or bigger triangle. We can imagine two cases, one in which the triangle has a small height and another in which the triangle has a large height. Both cases are allowed by the data and yield different areas, so Statement (2) is insufficient.
The correct answer is (A).
Attachment:
image477.png [ 5.11 KiB | Viewed 1450 times ]
Attachment:
image478.png [ 6.43 KiB | Viewed 1425 times ]
Attachment:
image482.png [ 2.93 KiB | Viewed 1423 times ]
Attachment:
image485.png [ 981 Bytes | Viewed 1422 times ]
