Hi imaityaroy,Yes, your approach is completely valid, and it's actually the cleanest way to see this problem. Let me just tighten one word in how you're describing it.
You correctly reduced the target to:
Q(SP - 40) / (Q · SP) = (SP - 40) / SP
The
Q cancels, so the profit percentage depends only on the selling price per coat - not on how many coats there are. Perfect.
The one refinement: when there are two different prices, the "SP" left in that formula is really the
weighted-average selling price per coat, i.e. total revenue / number of coats. So from Statement (1):
- Average SP =
0.2(80) + 0.8(60) = 64- Profit % = (
64 -
40) /
64 =
37.5%Since this is a single fixed number, Statement (1) is
sufficient - exactly your conclusion.
Why your read on Statement (2) is also right: knowing revenue = SP · Q =
6400 gives you the
product, but not the average SP by itself. And that average is exactly what you need. Watch two cases that both satisfy the statement:
-
100 coats - average SP =
64, cost =
4000, profit =
2400 -
37.5%-
80 coats - average SP =
80, cost =
3200, profit =
3200 -
50%Same revenue of $
6,400, two different answers -
not sufficient. That's precisely the gap you sensed: revenue alone doesn't pin down the per-coat SP.
So your logic holds end to end.
Answer: Aimaityaroy
Hi,
Can we solve like this ?
We have to find:
Quantity(SP - 40)/Quantity*SP
Quantity in numerator cancels Quantity in denominator hence, question become
what is (SP-40)/SP ... basically we have to find SP of 1 coat ?
From (1) we have the weighted average SP of 1 coat hence sufficient.
From (2) we have revenue ie SP*Quantity but we dont the exact SP hence insufficient
Thank you