Last visit was: 04 Sep 2026, 22:17 It is currently 04 Sep 2026, 22:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,146
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,327
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,146
Kudos: 839,154
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dhart
Joined: 02 Feb 2026
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 178
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 178
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MintLog
Joined: 07 Jul 2026
Last visit: 27 Jul 2026
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 4
Kudos: 4
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SoHaaM
Joined: 22 Apr 2026
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 5
Kudos: 5
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
statement 1. 82-34=48. sufficient

statement 2. 42-8=34 . Then, 82-34=48. also sufficnet

answer (D)
Attachments

Screenshot 2026-07-21 153727.png
Screenshot 2026-07-21 153727.png [ 23.94 KiB | Viewed 443 times ]

User avatar
Edskore
Joined: 29 Dec 2022
Last visit: 05 Aug 2026
Posts: 403
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 403
Kudos: 224
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This one's sneaky because it looks like a straightforward percent problem until you dig into statement 2, and I remember flagging almost the exact same trap on my own diagnostic.

1. Set total pet owners to 100 (percentages become headcounts). Cat owners = 18%, so dog owners = 82%.
2. Male pet owners = 42%, so female pet owners = 58%. We want female dog owners.
3. Statement 1: male dog owners = 34%. Since total dog owners = 82%, female dog owners = 82 - 34 = 48%. Sufficient.
4. Statement 2: female cat : male cat = 5:4. Cat owners total is fixed at 18%, so split 18 in a 5:4 ratio, female cat = 10%, male cat = 8%. Total male pet owners is 42%, so male dog = 42 - 8 = 34%. Female dog = 82 - 34 = 48%. Also sufficient, and it lands on the exact same 48%, nice sanity check.
5. Each statement alone nails down 48%, so the answer is D.

The trap here is assuming a ratio statement is automatically "not enough on its own" because it doesn't hand you a straight percentage. People see 5:4 and instinctively want to pair it with something else. But when the ratio applies to a category whose total you already know, it converts into hard numbers instantly. I actually stopped mid-solve to double check statement 2 wasn't secretly insufficient, because C felt like the "safe" pick.

Takeaway: when a DS ratio statement acts on a group whose size you already know, don't assume it needs backup, run the numbers before deciding it's insufficient.
Moderators:
Math Expert
113146 posts
DI Forum Moderator
409 posts