Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 00:29 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 00:29
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mariyea
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Last visit: 06 Dec 2011
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
277
 [2]
Given Kudos: 66
Schools:UC Berkley, UCLA
Posts: 185
Kudos: 277
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmat1220
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 17 Feb 2020
Posts: 461
Own Kudos:
1,015
 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Products:
Posts: 461
Kudos: 1,015
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mariyea
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Last visit: 06 Dec 2011
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Schools:UC Berkley, UCLA
Posts: 185
Kudos: 277
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmat1220
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 17 Feb 2020
Posts: 461
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Products:
Posts: 461
Kudos: 1,015
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey mariyea, keep an eye on the length. First essay does not have the length. I see the depth but not the width :-D I mean for beef it with random examples. E.g Org will loose if it just has a tunnel vision on the other hand org will loose even when dissatisfaction is going to smoulder in the employees. And you can even concoct a fresh looking example - e.g GE or Ford or Microsoft - they are not going to check the validity unless you tell them that Microsoft is a "mexican company based out of India" or something. So beef up ! First essay is 4 / 6

The second one is good. 5/6 The length is ok, its got the substance and the ideas. One more thing - never mix the ideas in two para. One para - one idea. Second para - second idea. So on ! Otherwise the examiner will think you have wasted the previous paragraph.

I wish you luck !
mariyea
Thanks! Great insight... I did it in less than 30 mins prolly like 29:43... and I didn't quite organize the flow of my essay. But what do you think, considering the organization of the essay, what do you think they'd give me?
User avatar
mariyea
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Last visit: 06 Dec 2011
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Schools:UC Berkley, UCLA
Posts: 185
Kudos: 277
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmat1220
Hey mariyea, keep an eye on the length. First essay does not have the length. I see the depth but not the width :-D I mean for beef it with random examples. E.g Org will loose if it just has a tunnel vision on the other hand org will loose even when dissatisfaction is going to smoulder in the employees. And you can even concoct a fresh looking example - e.g GE or Ford or Microsoft - they are not going to check the validity unless you tell them that Microsoft is a "mexican company based out of India" or something. So beef up ! First essay is 4 / 6

The second one is good. 5/6 The length is ok, its got the substance and the ideas. One more thing - never mix the ideas in two para. One para - one idea. Second para - second idea. So on ! Otherwise the examiner will think you have wasted the previous paragraph.

I wish you luck !
mariyea
Thanks! Great insight... I did it in less than 30 mins prolly like 29:43... and I didn't quite organize the flow of my essay. But what do you think, considering the organization of the essay, what do you think they'd give me?
Thank you so much!
User avatar
miguelmick
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Last visit: 27 Feb 2025
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Concentration: Real Estate, Finance
Schools: MIT (Sloan) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Schools: MIT (Sloan) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 131
Kudos: 1,429
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thanks for these resources!
avatar
Urvashi26
Joined: 07 Aug 2018
Last visit: 12 Jan 2019
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 85
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Flaw 1: assumes that greater number of student means --- more prestigious university --- the author use the word prestigious in a vague form.
flaw 2: assumes that the alumni will be able to provide funds. Even if, the alumnus provide enough funds, will that be enough to support the cause. The author should have mentioned a plan b, such loans or something, in case alumni do fail to provide support,.
flaw 3: assumes a reason to be the cause of the problem, had it been some other problem such as recession, competition with some uni., etc, then the plan to raise fund would definitely fail.
flaw 4: assumes that widening of subjects eliminated poor teaching!
avatar
ayushmeher
Joined: 23 Mar 2021
Last visit: 09 Apr 2021
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Posts: 1
Kudos: 2
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the recommendation to the Administrator of Fern University, Financial planning office come to conclusion to increase number of admissions in University, its recommended to initiate fund raising campaign among alumni which will help in adding new subjects and increasing size of the library infrastructure. However, before this recommendation get properly evaluated, two question must be answered.

Firstly, does adding new range of subject will help resolved the problem? Students cited that they are suffering with bad teaching. Instead of giving proper training to teacher rather than adding new subjects which only results in more problem. For Example, if teacher is unable to answer students queries then adding new subjects will not solved there issue. If the above is true, it will weaken the conclusion drawn.

Secondly, does increasing size of library and adding range of subjects will help Fern University to earn Prestigious University Title? It is quite exaggeration. There are lot factors responsible for university evaluation like Students to Teacher Ratio, Quality and Assessments, etc. Just by doing two tasks of adding subjects and increasing size of library won’t help university to become Most Prestigious University. Therefore, the arguments don’t hold.

In conclusion, the argument presented have flaws because of its dependence on unwarranted assumptions. If the author come out with answers for the above questions by providing good evidence then it is possible to evaluate viability of the above recommendation to add new subjects and increasing size of the library.
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,155
Own Kudos:
83,721
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24,679
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,155
Kudos: 83,721
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Welcome to GMAT Club!


Using the unofficial AWA grader GMATAWA, which you can't rely on 100% but it is a great indicator. Here is what I have:


AWA Score: 6 out of 6!
I have used a GMATAWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay. I think some of your long introduction has confused the essay grader since your "Firstly appeared only in the third paragraph". I tried deleting your first 2 paragraphs and that bumped the score up to 4.5 though it bumped the cohesion score down to 3.5. In any case, it proves that MORE is not always BETTER


Coherence and connectivity: 5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of idea and expression from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analysed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.

Paragraph structure and formation: 5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs is evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.


Vocabulary and word expression: 5/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocaubulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word-usage. Simple is the best form of suave!


:fingers_crossed: Please do not forget to use the Chineseburnt AWA Template!
https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6 ... 64327.html


ayushmeher
In the recommendation to the Administrator of Fern University, Financial planning office come to conclusion to increase number of admissions in University, its recommended to initiate fund raising campaign among alumni which will help in adding new subjects and increasing size of the library infrastructure. However, before this recommendation get properly evaluated, two question must be answered.

Firstly, does adding new range of subject will help resolved the problem? Students cited that they are suffering with bad teaching. Instead of giving proper training to teacher rather than adding new subjects which only results in more problem. For Example, if teacher is unable to answer students queries then adding new subjects will not solved there issue. If the above is true, it will weaken the conclusion drawn.

Secondly, does increasing size of library and adding range of subjects will help Fern University to earn Prestigious University Title? It is quite exaggeration. There are lot factors responsible for university evaluation like Students to Teacher Ratio, Quality and Assessments, etc. Just by doing two tasks of adding subjects and increasing size of library won’t help university to become Most Prestigious University. Therefore, the arguments don’t hold.

In conclusion, the argument presented have flaws because of its dependence on unwarranted assumptions. If the author come out with answers for the above questions by providing good evidence then it is possible to evaluate viability of the above recommendation to add new subjects and increasing size of the library.
User avatar
rc9811
Joined: 19 May 2018
Last visit: 07 Feb 2023
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please evaluate my AWA

In the past few years, Fern Valley University has suffered from a decline in both enrollments and admissions applications. The reason can be discovered from our students, who most often cite poor teaching and inadequate library resources as their chief sources of dissatisfaction with Fern Valley. Therefore, in order to increase the number of students attending our university, and hence to regain our position as the most prestigious university in the greater Fern Valley metropolitan area, it is necessary to initiate a fund-raising campaign among the alumni that will enable us to expand the range of subjects we teach and to increase the size of our library facilities.


The argument claims that reason behind the decline in enrolments and admission applications for Fern Valley University is inadequate library resources and poor teaching. So, in order to increase the number and regain its position, Fern Valley University found it necessary to initiate a fund raising campaign. At first the argument seems persuasive, however, the argument makes several unsupported assumptions and stated this way the argument fails to consider several key factors which could call the conclusion to question. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes poor teaching and inadequate library resources as main reason for the decline just because students cite that reason. However the argument fails to provide data for the question to what extent is the number of students expressing their dissatisfaction representative as a whole? For example, the student might express his/her personal sources of dissatisfaction as the chief sources of dissatisfaction for every student in the university. If the number is less the university would be working to rectify a wrong problem. Moreover the reason behind the decline could a totally a different one. For example, what if the cut off range for their minimum application requirement could be higher for any student to apply? If the argument had provided that data it would be helpful to evaluate the argument.

Second, the argument assumes that increase in the number of students would help them regain the position as the most prestigious university. However, it is actually the opposite of what the argument assumes, because in order to increase the number of student attending university, the university might have to compromise on their standards. For example, university might have to reduce their minimum requirements to cater to a large number of students.

Third, the final stage of the argument states that it is necessary to initiate a fund raising campaign among the alumni to expand the range of subjects we teach and to increase the size of our library facilities. Stated this way the argument readily assumes that the fund raised among the alumni would be sufficient for the expansion. What if number of alumni willing to participate in the fund raising is less? Without this information analysing the likelihood of the plan to succeed is difficult.

In summary, the argument fails to convince because of the faulty assumptions aforementioned. If the argument had drawn up on the examples as suggested, and thereby plugging in the gaps in the reasoning the argument would have been far sounder on the whole.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,814
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,334
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,814
Kudos: 51,907
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6

Coherence and connectivity: 5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.

Paragraph structure and formation: 4.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.

Vocabulary and word expression: 4/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!

Good Luck

rc9811
Please evaluate my AWA

In the past few years, Fern Valley University has suffered from a decline in both enrollments and admissions applications. The reason can be discovered from our students, who most often cite poor teaching and inadequate library resources as their chief sources of dissatisfaction with Fern Valley. Therefore, in order to increase the number of students attending our university, and hence to regain our position as the most prestigious university in the greater Fern Valley metropolitan area, it is necessary to initiate a fund-raising campaign among the alumni that will enable us to expand the range of subjects we teach and to increase the size of our library facilities.


The argument claims that reason behind the decline in enrolments and admission applications for Fern Valley University is inadequate library resources and poor teaching. So, in order to increase the number and regain its position, Fern Valley University found it necessary to initiate a fund raising campaign. At first the argument seems persuasive, however, the argument makes several unsupported assumptions and stated this way the argument fails to consider several key factors which could call the conclusion to question. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes poor teaching and inadequate library resources as main reason for the decline just because students cite that reason. However the argument fails to provide data for the question to what extent is the number of students expressing their dissatisfaction representative as a whole? For example, the student might express his/her personal sources of dissatisfaction as the chief sources of dissatisfaction for every student in the university. If the number is less the university would be working to rectify a wrong problem. Moreover the reason behind the decline could a totally a different one. For example, what if the cut off range for their minimum application requirement could be higher for any student to apply? If the argument had provided that data it would be helpful to evaluate the argument.

Second, the argument assumes that increase in the number of students would help them regain the position as the most prestigious university. However, it is actually the opposite of what the argument assumes, because in order to increase the number of student attending university, the university might have to compromise on their standards. For example, university might have to reduce their minimum requirements to cater to a large number of students.

Third, the final stage of the argument states that it is necessary to initiate a fund raising campaign among the alumni to expand the range of subjects we teach and to increase the size of our library facilities. Stated this way the argument readily assumes that the fund raised among the alumni would be sufficient for the expansion. What if number of alumni willing to participate in the fund raising is less? Without this information analysing the likelihood of the plan to succeed is difficult.

In summary, the argument fails to convince because of the faulty assumptions aforementioned. If the argument had drawn up on the examples as suggested, and thereby plugging in the gaps in the reasoning the argument would have been far sounder on the whole.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,426
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,426
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderator:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts