Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 17:46 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 17:46 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. 
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
30 May 2021, 18:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
Please evaluate my essay, point out the errors and suggest corrections and ideas to improve my performance.
The following appeared as part of a campaign to sell advertising time on a local radio station to local businesses.
“The Cumquat Cafe began advertising on our local radio station this year and was delighted to see its business increase by 10 percent over last year’s totals. Their success shows you how you can use radio advertising to make your business more profitable.”
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The argument claims that other businesses should also use radio advertising to make their business more profitable. The conclusion of the argument is based on the premise that the business of Cumquat Cafe experienced a growth of 10% after it began advertising on the local radio station. Stated in this way, the argument manipulates the facts and conveys a distorted view of the situation. Moreover, the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion of the argument relies on various assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument readily assumes that the growth of 10% in the business of Cumquat Cafe is a successful outcome. However, it has not been mentioned whether the increase in business was offset by the amount spent on advertising. If the cost of advertising was greater than the growth of business, the profitability of the Cumquat Cafe would certainly have decreased. Thus, the argument mislead us to arrive at the conclusion. Without having proper comparison between the growth and the cost of advertising, 10% increase in business cannot be viewed as success. The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated that the cost advertising was significantly smaller than the growth seen in the business of the Cumquat Cafe.
Second, the argument assumes that advertising on radio was the only reason behind the growth in business of the Cumquat Cafe. However, there can be other externalities that play vital role on the growth of a cafe. For example, it might be possible that the demand of the service provided by the Cumquat Cafe would have increased either due to decrease in the number of other competing cafes or due to increase in the population of the city where the Cumquat Cafe was located. Furthermore, the argument fails to mention many types of internalities. Was the Cumquat Cafe providing faster orders than before? Was it accepting payments in all forms? Was the quality of food improved? Was any new attractive service introduced? Without answer to this questions, it is illogical to contribute the growth of the Cumquat Cafe to radio advertising. If the argument would have provided evidence to answer all these questions, it could have been a lot more convincing.
Finally, the argument claims that radio advertising can too help other businesses increase their profitability. However, we cannot be sure that the strategy that worked well in the favor of the Cumquat Cafe will also work for other businesses. It might be possible that most of the radio listeners were those who were very much interested in the products and services of a cafe. Therefore, the generalization that the argument makes based on the single case might not hold true for other cases. This generalization would have been justified if the argument had been able to provide evidence proving radio advertising beneficial for businesses too.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons. Hence, the argument is disputed and indefensible. It could have been considerably strengthened if the author would have provided all the sufficient and necessary information to support the claim. Without these information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
The following appeared as part of a campaign to sell advertising time on a local radio station to local businesses.
“The Cumquat Cafe began advertising on our local radio station this year and was delighted to see its business increase by 10 percent over last year’s totals. Their success shows you how you can use radio advertising to make your business more profitable.”
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The argument claims that other businesses should also use radio advertising to make their business more profitable. The conclusion of the argument is based on the premise that the business of Cumquat Cafe experienced a growth of 10% after it began advertising on the local radio station. Stated in this way, the argument manipulates the facts and conveys a distorted view of the situation. Moreover, the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion of the argument relies on various assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument readily assumes that the growth of 10% in the business of Cumquat Cafe is a successful outcome. However, it has not been mentioned whether the increase in business was offset by the amount spent on advertising. If the cost of advertising was greater than the growth of business, the profitability of the Cumquat Cafe would certainly have decreased. Thus, the argument mislead us to arrive at the conclusion. Without having proper comparison between the growth and the cost of advertising, 10% increase in business cannot be viewed as success. The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated that the cost advertising was significantly smaller than the growth seen in the business of the Cumquat Cafe.
Second, the argument assumes that advertising on radio was the only reason behind the growth in business of the Cumquat Cafe. However, there can be other externalities that play vital role on the growth of a cafe. For example, it might be possible that the demand of the service provided by the Cumquat Cafe would have increased either due to decrease in the number of other competing cafes or due to increase in the population of the city where the Cumquat Cafe was located. Furthermore, the argument fails to mention many types of internalities. Was the Cumquat Cafe providing faster orders than before? Was it accepting payments in all forms? Was the quality of food improved? Was any new attractive service introduced? Without answer to this questions, it is illogical to contribute the growth of the Cumquat Cafe to radio advertising. If the argument would have provided evidence to answer all these questions, it could have been a lot more convincing.
Finally, the argument claims that radio advertising can too help other businesses increase their profitability. However, we cannot be sure that the strategy that worked well in the favor of the Cumquat Cafe will also work for other businesses. It might be possible that most of the radio listeners were those who were very much interested in the products and services of a cafe. Therefore, the generalization that the argument makes based on the single case might not hold true for other cases. This generalization would have been justified if the argument had been able to provide evidence proving radio advertising beneficial for businesses too.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons. Hence, the argument is disputed and indefensible. It could have been considerably strengthened if the author would have provided all the sufficient and necessary information to support the claim. Without these information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
31 May 2021, 01:21
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5 out of 6!
I have used a GMATAWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay.
Coherence and connectivity: 5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of idea and expression from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analysed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.
Paragraph structure and formation: 4.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs is evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.
Vocabulary and word expression: 4/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocaubulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word-usage. Simple is the best form of suave!
I have used a GMATAWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay.
Coherence and connectivity: 5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of idea and expression from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analysed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.
Paragraph structure and formation: 4.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs is evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.
Vocabulary and word expression: 4/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocaubulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word-usage. Simple is the best form of suave!
Good luck
ukc1998
19 Jul 2021, 19:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
The author makes the argument that Cumquat Café began advertising on our local radio station last year and the café saw its business increase by 10 percent. Thus, the author argues all local businesses should start doing the same. While the argument may have some legitimacy, it does have several flaws. The first flaw is any evidence suggesting that this is not perhaps a one-off /outlier event. The second flaw is that the two events may be correlated but not casual in nature. The The third flaw is the past does not necessarily indicate the future.
The first issue is perhaps Cumquat Café was just one outlier in a sea of other café’s who may have also advertised on our local station. It’s quite possible that Cumquat Café was the only café that was profitable whereas other cafés were not profitable or maybe lost profit. In order to strengthen his position, the author needs to confirm if perhaps other Cafes also advertised and what were their respective sales for those other cafes were. If indeed Cumquat Café and other cafes all saw their sales increase after advertising on our local station, then that strengthens the authors argument.
The second flaw in the argument is correlation does not necessarily mean causation. Just because two events have been noticed together does not mean advertising specifically was the driver behind the increased sales. Maybe Cumquat Café would have experienced those sales even without the need for local advertising. The author in order to strengthen his argument needs to confirm if the increased sales were driven by customers who saw the advertisement on our local station. The author needs to conduct a customer survey or random interviews with patrons at the Cumquat Café to confirm if they came because of advertising on our local station specifically or were other factors (perhaps discounts offered / perhaps competition went out of business) involved.
The third argument is the past does not indicate the future. Sure, the Cumquat Café may have been profitable because of advertising on our location station but this did happen in the past. There is no guarantee that it may happen in the future. Maybe now, in order to reach potential customers, there are better ways to advertise (social media, promotional events for example). In order to strengthen his position, the author needs to confirm the best way to reach out to potentially new customers is indeed advertising over the radio and not advertising through other means.
Thus, in conclusion, while the author may have made an argument, it does have several flaws. In order to strengthen his argument, the author needs to provide evidence that Cumquat Café making profit wasn’t an one -time /outlier event. Secondly, the author needs to confirm interviewing customers if indeed advertising was the driver behind the 10 % increase in business or were other factors involved. Lastly, just because the Café was profitable in the past, there is not proof that this will repeat in the future. The author needs to confirm if no factors have changed since the past to get some evidence to suggest the past would repeat itself in the future.
The first issue is perhaps Cumquat Café was just one outlier in a sea of other café’s who may have also advertised on our local station. It’s quite possible that Cumquat Café was the only café that was profitable whereas other cafés were not profitable or maybe lost profit. In order to strengthen his position, the author needs to confirm if perhaps other Cafes also advertised and what were their respective sales for those other cafes were. If indeed Cumquat Café and other cafes all saw their sales increase after advertising on our local station, then that strengthens the authors argument.
The second flaw in the argument is correlation does not necessarily mean causation. Just because two events have been noticed together does not mean advertising specifically was the driver behind the increased sales. Maybe Cumquat Café would have experienced those sales even without the need for local advertising. The author in order to strengthen his argument needs to confirm if the increased sales were driven by customers who saw the advertisement on our local station. The author needs to conduct a customer survey or random interviews with patrons at the Cumquat Café to confirm if they came because of advertising on our local station specifically or were other factors (perhaps discounts offered / perhaps competition went out of business) involved.
The third argument is the past does not indicate the future. Sure, the Cumquat Café may have been profitable because of advertising on our location station but this did happen in the past. There is no guarantee that it may happen in the future. Maybe now, in order to reach potential customers, there are better ways to advertise (social media, promotional events for example). In order to strengthen his position, the author needs to confirm the best way to reach out to potentially new customers is indeed advertising over the radio and not advertising through other means.
Thus, in conclusion, while the author may have made an argument, it does have several flaws. In order to strengthen his argument, the author needs to provide evidence that Cumquat Café making profit wasn’t an one -time /outlier event. Secondly, the author needs to confirm interviewing customers if indeed advertising was the driver behind the 10 % increase in business or were other factors involved. Lastly, just because the Café was profitable in the past, there is not proof that this will repeat in the future. The author needs to confirm if no factors have changed since the past to get some evidence to suggest the past would repeat itself in the future.
19 Jul 2021, 23:26
Kudos
Bookmarks
On what prompt your essay is based?
jabhatta2
