Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 20:02 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 20:02
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
sheldongeorge
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2015
Last visit: 26 May 2022
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
5
Given Kudos: 37
Location: United States
Schools: Stanford '24 Booth '24 (II)
Schools: Stanford '24 Booth '24 (II)
Posts: 47
Kudos: 5
Candidate: Our city's students have suffered long enough. Over the may 03 Jun 2021, 01:00
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi

Candidate: Our city's students have suffered long enough. Over the mayor's four years in office, our district's math and science scores have hovered well below the national average, even while our average teacher's salary has increased. Our student-per-class ratio is laughable, yet he has made no progress on building a new school. He simply cannot be trusted with our children's future; if you care about education, I am the only candidate you can support.

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.


Quote:
The argument claims that the author of the candidate is the only candidate one must support, if one cares about the education in the city. This is based on the premise that during the incumbent mayor's four years in office, the district's math and science scores have hovered below the national average, even while the average teacher's salary has increased. The argument also relies on the idea that even though the student-per-class ratio is unacceptable, yet the current mayor has made no progress on building a new school.

Stated in this manner, the argument is weak and reveals examples of leap of faith and poor reasoning. The argument also fails to take into account several factors based on which it could be evaluated. The argument also relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.

The first issue to be addressed is whether the teachers are to be blamed for the children's poor performance in math and science tests. Clearly one could argue that this need be the case. If some other factor is acting as a deterrent to the children's education then clearly the argument would stand weakened. For example, if a pandemic were to happen and learning were to switch to online mode, then, it would have been reasonable to assume that without the availability of a personal computer, which may be unaffordable for children from an economically disadvantaged background, children would be unable to attend classes and hence perform poorly on tests. Therefore, blaming teachers for the poor outcome is national tests in clearly unjustified. Had the author mentioned that the children's poor performance in tests has happened despite all other external factors remaining unchanged then it would have been much simpler to evaluate the argument.

The argument also relies on the idea that even though the student-per-class ratio is unacceptably high, yet the incumbent mayor has made no progress on building a new school. This may not always be the case. As building a new school requires clearances from the relevant state authorities, it is possible that the incumbent mayor may have already applied for permission for building a new school and the delay in granting the permission may be entirely a fault of the relevant state education department. If the state authorities already have several such requests and limited man-power then processing these requests is bound to be a long and drawn out process. Had the author mentioned that the mayor has not taken any steps in pursuit of building a new school, then the candidate's reasoning would have been much better received.

In conclusion, while at first it may appear that the mayoral candidate's accusations of the incumbent mayor are well founded, a careful analysis reveals that this is certainly not the case. Several other factors such as those mentioned above need to be taken into consideration before a verdict on the effectiveness or lack thereof the incumbent mayor's actions can be judged.
Show more

Sajjad1994 , how would you rate this? Thank you
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,765
Own Kudos:
51,953
Given Kudos: 6,336
GPA: 3.62
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 16,765
Kudos: 51,953
Candidate: Our city's students have suffered long enough. Over the may 03 Jun 2021, 11:00
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AWA Score: 4 out of 6!

I have used a GMATAWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay.

Coherence and connectivity: 2.5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of idea and expression from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analysed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.

Paragraph structure and formation: 3.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs is evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.

Vocabulary and word expression: 4.5/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocaubulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word-usage. Simple is the best form of suave!

Good Luck

sheldongeorge
Hi

Candidate: Our city's students have suffered long enough. Over the mayor's four years in office, our district's math and science scores have hovered well below the national average, even while our average teacher's salary has increased. Our student-per-class ratio is laughable, yet he has made no progress on building a new school. He simply cannot be trusted with our children's future; if you care about education, I am the only candidate you can support.

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.


Quote:
The argument claims that the author of the candidate is the only candidate one must support, if one cares about the education in the city. This is based on the premise that during the incumbent mayor's four years in office, the district's math and science scores have hovered below the national average, even while the average teacher's salary has increased. The argument also relies on the idea that even though the student-per-class ratio is unacceptable, yet the current mayor has made no progress on building a new school.

Stated in this manner, the argument is weak and reveals examples of leap of faith and poor reasoning. The argument also fails to take into account several factors based on which it could be evaluated. The argument also relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.

The first issue to be addressed is whether the teachers are to be blamed for the children's poor performance in math and science tests. Clearly one could argue that this need be the case. If some other factor is acting as a deterrent to the children's education then clearly the argument would stand weakened. For example, if a pandemic were to happen and learning were to switch to online mode, then, it would have been reasonable to assume that without the availability of a personal computer, which may be unaffordable for children from an economically disadvantaged background, children would be unable to attend classes and hence perform poorly on tests. Therefore, blaming teachers for the poor outcome is national tests in clearly unjustified. Had the author mentioned that the children's poor performance in tests has happened despite all other external factors remaining unchanged then it would have been much simpler to evaluate the argument.

The argument also relies on the idea that even though the student-per-class ratio is unacceptably high, yet the incumbent mayor has made no progress on building a new school. This may not always be the case. As building a new school requires clearances from the relevant state authorities, it is possible that the incumbent mayor may have already applied for permission for building a new school and the delay in granting the permission may be entirely a fault of the relevant state education department. If the state authorities already have several such requests and limited man-power then processing these requests is bound to be a long and drawn out process. Had the author mentioned that the mayor has not taken any steps in pursuit of building a new school, then the candidate's reasoning would have been much better received.

In conclusion, while at first it may appear that the mayoral candidate's accusations of the incumbent mayor are well founded, a careful analysis reveals that this is certainly not the case. Several other factors such as those mentioned above need to be taken into consideration before a verdict on the effectiveness or lack thereof the incumbent mayor's actions can be judged.

Sajjad1994 , how would you rate this? Thank you
Show more
User avatar
sheldongeorge
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2015
Last visit: 26 May 2022
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
5
Given Kudos: 37
Location: United States
Schools: Stanford '24 Booth '24 (II)
Schools: Stanford '24 Booth '24 (II)
Posts: 47
Kudos: 5
Candidate: Our city's students have suffered long enough. Over the may 07 Jun 2021, 03:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
AWA Score: 4 out of 6!

I have used a GMATAWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay.

Coherence and connectivity: 2.5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of idea and expression from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analysed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.

Paragraph structure and formation: 3.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs is evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.

Vocabulary and word expression: 4.5/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocaubulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word-usage. Simple is the best form of suave!

Good Luck

sheldongeorge
Hi

Candidate: Our city's students have suffered long enough. Over the mayor's four years in office, our district's math and science scores have hovered well below the national average, even while our average teacher's salary has increased. Our student-per-class ratio is laughable, yet he has made no progress on building a new school. He simply cannot be trusted with our children's future; if you care about education, I am the only candidate you can support.

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.


Quote:
The argument claims that the author of the candidate is the only candidate one must support, if one cares about the education in the city. This is based on the premise that during the incumbent mayor's four years in office, the district's math and science scores have hovered below the national average, even while the average teacher's salary has increased. The argument also relies on the idea that even though the student-per-class ratio is unacceptable, yet the current mayor has made no progress on building a new school.

Stated in this manner, the argument is weak and reveals examples of leap of faith and poor reasoning. The argument also fails to take into account several factors based on which it could be evaluated. The argument also relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.

The first issue to be addressed is whether the teachers are to be blamed for the children's poor performance in math and science tests. Clearly one could argue that this need be the case. If some other factor is acting as a deterrent to the children's education then clearly the argument would stand weakened. For example, if a pandemic were to happen and learning were to switch to online mode, then, it would have been reasonable to assume that without the availability of a personal computer, which may be unaffordable for children from an economically disadvantaged background, children would be unable to attend classes and hence perform poorly on tests. Therefore, blaming teachers for the poor outcome is national tests in clearly unjustified. Had the author mentioned that the children's poor performance in tests has happened despite all other external factors remaining unchanged then it would have been much simpler to evaluate the argument.

The argument also relies on the idea that even though the student-per-class ratio is unacceptably high, yet the incumbent mayor has made no progress on building a new school. This may not always be the case. As building a new school requires clearances from the relevant state authorities, it is possible that the incumbent mayor may have already applied for permission for building a new school and the delay in granting the permission may be entirely a fault of the relevant state education department. If the state authorities already have several such requests and limited man-power then processing these requests is bound to be a long and drawn out process. Had the author mentioned that the mayor has not taken any steps in pursuit of building a new school, then the candidate's reasoning would have been much better received.

In conclusion, while at first it may appear that the mayoral candidate's accusations of the incumbent mayor are well founded, a careful analysis reveals that this is certainly not the case. Several other factors such as those mentioned above need to be taken into consideration before a verdict on the effectiveness or lack thereof the incumbent mayor's actions can be judged.

Sajjad1994 , how would you rate this? Thank you
Show more

Thank you
Moderator:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts