Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations le

Question

“Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its twenty-fifth birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.”

The argument claims that Olympic Foods will be able to minimize costs and thus maximize profits. Stated this way the argument fails to mention several key factors on the basis of which it could be evaluated and reveals examples of leap of faith and poor reasoning. The conclusion of the argument relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Therefore the argument is rather unconvincing and has several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes that key factors for cost reduction for the color film processing industry and for food industry would be same or similar. The statement is not substantiated in any way. For example the machinery used in both the industry, the transportation type, and also perishability of food items make both industries significantly different from each other. Therefore the cost structure and scopes of cost reduction would also be different. Looking at these possibilities the comparison is unfounded. The assumption would have been more logical if the comparison had happened with similar industries.

Second, Citing the fact that over time the cost of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, the argument claims that since Olympic foods will soon celebrate its twenty-fifth birthday, it will be able to minimize the cost. However, we do not know whether over the last 25 years Olympic Foods has made any improvements in its processes. If the passage had provided any evidence of improvement of processes of Olympic Foods, the argument would have been a lot more convincing.

In conclusion, the argument is therefore flawed and unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author mentioned all relevant facts. In order to access the merits of a certain situation it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors.

Sajjad1994 · Answer

AWA Score: 4.5 out of 6

Coherence and Connectivity: 5
The essay demonstrates a good level of coherence and connectivity. The ideas are presented in a logical order, and there is a clear progression from one point to the next. The essay effectively evaluates the author's argument and identifies the flawed reasoning. Transitions between sentences and paragraphs are generally smooth, contributing to the overall coherence of the essay.

Word Structure: 5
The essay demonstrates a good command of word structure. The sentences are well-constructed and effectively convey the intended meaning. There is a variety of sentence structures, and the essay uses appropriate vocabulary to express ideas. The essay does not contain significant issues with word choice or sentence structure.

Paragraph Structure and Formation: 4.5
The essay has a clear introduction that presents the main argument and a conclusion that summarizes the main points. The body paragraphs effectively analyze the flaws in the argument and provide supporting evidence and reasoning. Each paragraph focuses on one specific flaw and provides a clear explanation. The essay could have benefited from slightly stronger topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph to guide the reader more explicitly.

Language and Grammar: 5
The essay demonstrates good language use and grammar. There are only minor grammatical errors or awkward phrasings throughout the essay. The language is clear and effectively conveys the intended meaning. The essay uses appropriate verb tenses, pronouns, and sentence structures.

Vocabulary and Word Expression: 4.5
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary and word expression. There is effective use of relevant terminology and vocabulary related to the topic. The essay could benefit from incorporating more precise and sophisticated vocabulary to enhance the overall quality of expression. However, the vocabulary used is still appropriate and effectively conveys the intended meaning.

Overall, the essay receives a score of 4.5 out of 6. The essay demonstrates coherence and connectivity, solid word structure, and good language and grammar use. The paragraph structure and formation are generally strong, although slightly stronger topic sentences could enhance the organization. The vocabulary and word expression are effective, although some improvements could be made to incorporate more precise and sophisticated language.

Anugmat740 · Answer

Sajjad1994  Hi, can you evaluate the below answer.

The passage mentions the example of a Color film processing unit to present the argument "The cost of processing is inversely proportion to time. Over time, organizations become efficient with improvement in processing and low processing costs". Author extends this example to another industry, which is food processing and give example of Olymic Foods. Author argues that since Olymic Foods will complete its 25 years of establishment, it is expected that its cost will be minimized, and profits will be maximized. The conclusion of the argument relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes that the model which is successful in one industry will also replicate its success in another industry. The two industry processes, author relates a color film processing and processing of foods, may not be directly related to each other. The argument could have been much clear if it is explicitly stated that the two industries are directly related, so that an equivalence between the two can be established.

Second, the argument claims that the reducing cost of processing will invariably maximize the profits. Author does not account the fact that profit also depends on the sales of the business. If the sales have gone down, then the business may not maximize the profits despite the reduction in the costs. If the argument has provided that there is no effect on the sales of the business or the sale of the business also increased over time, then the argument that minimizing cost will maximize the profits can be considered.

Finally, the author assumed in its argument that the costs associated with a business is only cost of processing. However, there are other costs such as Employee Salary, which also increases over time; Selling and General Expenditures are also not considered, which also increases over time. Author established the argument on the basis of certain fixed parameters related to costs and has not considered the overall business scenarios of both the industries.

In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentions all the related facts about both the businesses and the parameters associated with costs in both of the industries.

In order to assess the merit of author conclusion about maximizing profits, it is essential to have the knowledge of all the contributing factors. In this particular case relationship between the two industry is not mentioned, one conclusion which is true for one industry is assumed to be true for another industry, the conclusion of maximizing profits is based only on minimizing the cost. Without this information the argument remains unsubstantiated and is open to debate.

Sajjad1994 · Answer

AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6

Coherence and connectivity (5.5/6):
The essay maintains good coherence and connectivity throughout. It effectively transitions between different points and ideas. However, there are a few instances where sentence structures could be more varied for smoother readability.

Word structure (5.5/6):
The essay demonstrates a strong command of language and vocabulary. The sentences are well-structured, but there are some minor issues with word choice and sentence structure in a few places.

Paragraph structure and formation (5.5/6):
The essay follows a standard paragraph structure with clear topic sentences and supporting details. There is a logical flow to the argument, but some sentences could be broken into shorter ones for improved clarity.

Language and Grammar (5.5/6):
The language and grammar in the essay are strong, with only minor grammatical errors and awkward phrasings. The essay maintains a formal tone appropriate for an analytical essay.

Vocabulary and word expression (5.5/6):
The vocabulary and word expression are effective throughout the essay. The writer uses a variety of vocabulary to convey their points and ideas, though there are a few instances where word choice could be more precise.

Overall, this essay effectively analyzes the argument presented in the prompt. It identifies the flaws in the argument and offers constructive criticism. Some minor improvements in sentence structure and word choice could enhance the overall quality of the essay.

Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations le

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards