Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
09 Nov 2023, 07:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
The following appeared in an article in a health–and–fitness magazine:
“Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, the small town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Even though Saluda Natural Spring Water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counter examples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Answer:
An article appearing in a health-and-fitness magazine suggests its readers to invest in and consume Saluda Natural Spring Water due to its apparent health benefits. However, the argument is flawed for several reasons.
Firstly, the given snippet blindly assumes that the spring water is the sole reason why the residents of Saluda are hospitalized less frequently that the national average rate. It fails to consider other possible reasons for the phenomenon, such as an overall healthy lifestyle followed by the people of Saluda. They might engage in excercise and a nutritious diet, keeping them healthier than the general public. Hence, more information of their lifestyle might strengthen the argument.
Moreover, the author of the article suggests the reader to prefer Saluda Natural Spring Water over tap water as it keeps the people of Saluda healthy. But, the author fails to consider that if something worked for the people of Saluda, it may not provide the same results for other people living outside the region. The physiology and the biological requirements of people might be different due to regional factors.
Finally, the argument seemingly suggests that investing in the expensive Saluda Natural Spring Water is the only way for the readers to achieve good health. The minerals in the given water might be obtained via several different sources like organic fruits and vegetables. Futhermore, it doesn't take into consideration the affordability factor of the product. If the product isn't affordable by most readers, then it is not a convenient solution for attaining a healthy lifestyle.
Hence, the argument is flawed for several reasons and can be improved by providing more insights regarding the product, the lifestyle of the residents of Saluda, and also the affordable alternatives for the given bottled water.
“Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, the small town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Even though Saluda Natural Spring Water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counter examples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Answer:
An article appearing in a health-and-fitness magazine suggests its readers to invest in and consume Saluda Natural Spring Water due to its apparent health benefits. However, the argument is flawed for several reasons.
Firstly, the given snippet blindly assumes that the spring water is the sole reason why the residents of Saluda are hospitalized less frequently that the national average rate. It fails to consider other possible reasons for the phenomenon, such as an overall healthy lifestyle followed by the people of Saluda. They might engage in excercise and a nutritious diet, keeping them healthier than the general public. Hence, more information of their lifestyle might strengthen the argument.
Moreover, the author of the article suggests the reader to prefer Saluda Natural Spring Water over tap water as it keeps the people of Saluda healthy. But, the author fails to consider that if something worked for the people of Saluda, it may not provide the same results for other people living outside the region. The physiology and the biological requirements of people might be different due to regional factors.
Finally, the argument seemingly suggests that investing in the expensive Saluda Natural Spring Water is the only way for the readers to achieve good health. The minerals in the given water might be obtained via several different sources like organic fruits and vegetables. Futhermore, it doesn't take into consideration the affordability factor of the product. If the product isn't affordable by most readers, then it is not a convenient solution for attaining a healthy lifestyle.
Hence, the argument is flawed for several reasons and can be improved by providing more insights regarding the product, the lifestyle of the residents of Saluda, and also the affordable alternatives for the given bottled water.
10 Nov 2023, 00:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay maintains a high level of coherence and connectivity. Each paragraph is logically connected to the next, and there is a clear progression of ideas. Transitions are generally smooth, contributing to the overall flow of the essay. However, there are slight instances where more explicit transitional phrases could enhance the connection between ideas.
Word Structure: 5.5/6
The word structure is strong, with varied sentence structures contributing to the overall quality of the essay. The writer uses precise and appropriate language throughout, but there is room for improvement in a few sentences where clarity could be enhanced through more concise expression.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 6/6
The essay is well-organized into distinct paragraphs, each addressing a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction effectively sets up the main points to be discussed, and the conclusion provides a concise summary of the key arguments. The paragraph structure is clear and supports the overall flow of the essay.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The language and grammar used in the essay are excellent. Sentences are grammatically correct, and there is a consistent use of formal language. The essay demonstrates a strong command of English language conventions.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression are strong, with a varied and precise choice of words. However, in a few instances, there is room for even more nuanced vocabulary to elevate the sophistication of expression. Additionally, some sentences could benefit from more concise wording for enhanced clarity.
Overall, the essay effectively critiques the given argument, pointing out key flaws and suggesting improvements. With minor refinements in word structure and vocabulary, the essay could achieve an even higher level of effectiveness.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay maintains a high level of coherence and connectivity. Each paragraph is logically connected to the next, and there is a clear progression of ideas. Transitions are generally smooth, contributing to the overall flow of the essay. However, there are slight instances where more explicit transitional phrases could enhance the connection between ideas.
Word Structure: 5.5/6
The word structure is strong, with varied sentence structures contributing to the overall quality of the essay. The writer uses precise and appropriate language throughout, but there is room for improvement in a few sentences where clarity could be enhanced through more concise expression.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 6/6
The essay is well-organized into distinct paragraphs, each addressing a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction effectively sets up the main points to be discussed, and the conclusion provides a concise summary of the key arguments. The paragraph structure is clear and supports the overall flow of the essay.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The language and grammar used in the essay are excellent. Sentences are grammatically correct, and there is a consistent use of formal language. The essay demonstrates a strong command of English language conventions.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression are strong, with a varied and precise choice of words. However, in a few instances, there is room for even more nuanced vocabulary to elevate the sophistication of expression. Additionally, some sentences could benefit from more concise wording for enhanced clarity.
Overall, the essay effectively critiques the given argument, pointing out key flaws and suggesting improvements. With minor refinements in word structure and vocabulary, the essay could achieve an even higher level of effectiveness.
aapatre
Moderator:
