Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
20 Jan 2024, 08:20
Kudos
Bookmarks
Please review and provide feedback for this AWA essay
“The inflow of immigrant workers into our community has put a downward pressure on wages. In fact, the average compensation of unskilled labor in our city has declined by nearly 10% over the past 5 years. Therefore, to protect our local economy, it is essential to impose a moratorium on further immigration.”
Essay:
The argument states that due the inflow of immigrant workers in a certain community, there has been a downward pressure on wages. As it currently stands, the argument relies on several assumptions and has no clear evidence to substantiate them. Additionally, it reaches to a conclusion that, to protect the economy it is essential to impose a moratorium, without addressing key factors and presenting data to reach to this conclusion. Consequently, the argument has several flaws that make it unsound and unconvincing.
First, wages in an economy of a certain community can be impacted by several factors, and stating it is the inflow of immigrant as the only cause of the downward pressure could be unjust. It is possible, that the economy as a whole is undergoing crises, due to which overall wages across businesses in the community have reduced. If substantial evidence was provided whilst addressing inflow of immigrant as the main cause it could strengthen the argument.
Second, the argument states that the average compensation of unskilled labor has declined by nearly 10% over the past 5 years. The argument has not established a clear connection with how the decline in the average compensation and the inflow of immigrant workers putting a downward pressure on wages. Furthermore, this data states a 10% decline, but no clear indication as to what percent of decline or impact would be correlated to the downward pressure on wages due to the inflow of immigrant workers.
Lastly, based on these assumptions the argument is reaching to the conclusion that to protect the local economy and not causing any further downward pressure on the wages, the only way possible is by imposing a moratorium on further immigration. No other way has been considered just in reaching this outcome. It is possible that stopping the immigrants from entering the community has other adverse effects. For instance, reduced supply of labor, or lack of sufficient skillset in the domestic labor, which might negatively affect the production and as a result the economy. If these factors are considered and an in depth factual report for the same is analysed, before reaching to this conclusion it could strengthen the argument.
In conclusion the argument is not convincing because of the above-mentioned flaws. If the argument had clearly presented all facts relating to the downward pressure on wages and analysed other factors as well, the argument could be considerably strengthened. In its current state, the argument has flaws, is weak and unsound.
“The inflow of immigrant workers into our community has put a downward pressure on wages. In fact, the average compensation of unskilled labor in our city has declined by nearly 10% over the past 5 years. Therefore, to protect our local economy, it is essential to impose a moratorium on further immigration.”
Essay:
The argument states that due the inflow of immigrant workers in a certain community, there has been a downward pressure on wages. As it currently stands, the argument relies on several assumptions and has no clear evidence to substantiate them. Additionally, it reaches to a conclusion that, to protect the economy it is essential to impose a moratorium, without addressing key factors and presenting data to reach to this conclusion. Consequently, the argument has several flaws that make it unsound and unconvincing.
First, wages in an economy of a certain community can be impacted by several factors, and stating it is the inflow of immigrant as the only cause of the downward pressure could be unjust. It is possible, that the economy as a whole is undergoing crises, due to which overall wages across businesses in the community have reduced. If substantial evidence was provided whilst addressing inflow of immigrant as the main cause it could strengthen the argument.
Second, the argument states that the average compensation of unskilled labor has declined by nearly 10% over the past 5 years. The argument has not established a clear connection with how the decline in the average compensation and the inflow of immigrant workers putting a downward pressure on wages. Furthermore, this data states a 10% decline, but no clear indication as to what percent of decline or impact would be correlated to the downward pressure on wages due to the inflow of immigrant workers.
Lastly, based on these assumptions the argument is reaching to the conclusion that to protect the local economy and not causing any further downward pressure on the wages, the only way possible is by imposing a moratorium on further immigration. No other way has been considered just in reaching this outcome. It is possible that stopping the immigrants from entering the community has other adverse effects. For instance, reduced supply of labor, or lack of sufficient skillset in the domestic labor, which might negatively affect the production and as a result the economy. If these factors are considered and an in depth factual report for the same is analysed, before reaching to this conclusion it could strengthen the argument.
In conclusion the argument is not convincing because of the above-mentioned flaws. If the argument had clearly presented all facts relating to the downward pressure on wages and analysed other factors as well, the argument could be considerably strengthened. In its current state, the argument has flaws, is weak and unsound.
20 Jan 2024, 15:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 6
The essay maintains strong coherence and connectivity throughout, with clear transitions between ideas and paragraphs. The progression of the argument is logical and easy to follow.
Word Structure: 5.5
The essay uses a varied and appropriate range of vocabulary. However, there are a few instances where word choices could be more precise or refined. Overall, the language is clear and effective in conveying the message.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 6
Each paragraph has a clear structure, with a topic sentence, supporting details, and a concluding sentence. The organization contributes to the overall clarity and effectiveness of the essay.
Language and Grammar: 6
The essay demonstrates a strong command of language and grammar. Sentences are well-constructed, and there are minimal grammatical errors. The language used is formal and appropriate for an analytical essay.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5
The vocabulary is generally strong, but there are a few instances where more sophisticated or precise word choices could enhance the expression. The essay effectively conveys ideas but could benefit from slight improvements in vocabulary.
Overall, the essay is well-structured and coherent, with a strong command of language and grammar. Some minor refinements in word choices could further enhance its effectiveness.
Coherence and Connectivity: 6
The essay maintains strong coherence and connectivity throughout, with clear transitions between ideas and paragraphs. The progression of the argument is logical and easy to follow.
Word Structure: 5.5
The essay uses a varied and appropriate range of vocabulary. However, there are a few instances where word choices could be more precise or refined. Overall, the language is clear and effective in conveying the message.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 6
Each paragraph has a clear structure, with a topic sentence, supporting details, and a concluding sentence. The organization contributes to the overall clarity and effectiveness of the essay.
Language and Grammar: 6
The essay demonstrates a strong command of language and grammar. Sentences are well-constructed, and there are minimal grammatical errors. The language used is formal and appropriate for an analytical essay.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5
The vocabulary is generally strong, but there are a few instances where more sophisticated or precise word choices could enhance the expression. The essay effectively conveys ideas but could benefit from slight improvements in vocabulary.
Overall, the essay is well-structured and coherent, with a strong command of language and grammar. Some minor refinements in word choices could further enhance its effectiveness.
shivesh0802
Moderator:
