Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
11 Oct 2009, 00:04
Kudos
Bookmarks
Issue:
Consumers need to be protected from companies that make deceptive claims in their advertising. However, companies should always be allowed to make truthful claims, even if those claims could be misunderstood by some consumers.
My Answer:
The author says that, consumers should be protected from deceptive claims, whereas truthful claims that are misleading could very well be allowed. The prospect of such an advertisement is rather intriguing. The supporters of this idea might regard saying the information conveyed cannot depend on how the receiver understands it. But, this idea would practically prove to be Pandora’s Box for the companies that broadcast misleading advertisements for the following reasons discussed below.
Firstly, it is possible that a company could make a truthful claim which is misunderstood by consumers leading to dissatisfaction among the consumers. For example, a tooth paste manufacturing company advertises that their toothpaste has highest quantity of salt in it. This might make people think with an assumption that quality of tooth paste is proportional to the quantity of salt content in it. Hence, this somehow creates customers to the company, who might be potential customers for a company that is manufacturing by far better products. As time rolls on, consumers realize the product with deceiving advertisement and tend to develop aversion towards that brand. In my view, the pitfalls of such advertisements that inadvertently induces a false sense of quality among customers, by far overweigh the potential advantages.
Secondly, it is possible to manipulate the truthful information which might be of no use, to seemingly appear very much useful. Also, an opportunity gained by a company through misdeeds is an opportunity lost to another company. Hence, in a free economy, such advertisements might misdirect people, leading to an abyss in the industry. Hence, there needs to be a panel that reviews every advertisement before it is broadcasted.
In sum, the author provides feeble rationale in allowing companies to make misleading claims while advertising. The thin line that differentiates between truthful but misleading claims and proper claims should be taken care.
_____________
Please rate the essay on a scale of 1-6. I have my test next week. Your suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Consumers need to be protected from companies that make deceptive claims in their advertising. However, companies should always be allowed to make truthful claims, even if those claims could be misunderstood by some consumers.
My Answer:
The author says that, consumers should be protected from deceptive claims, whereas truthful claims that are misleading could very well be allowed. The prospect of such an advertisement is rather intriguing. The supporters of this idea might regard saying the information conveyed cannot depend on how the receiver understands it. But, this idea would practically prove to be Pandora’s Box for the companies that broadcast misleading advertisements for the following reasons discussed below.
Firstly, it is possible that a company could make a truthful claim which is misunderstood by consumers leading to dissatisfaction among the consumers. For example, a tooth paste manufacturing company advertises that their toothpaste has highest quantity of salt in it. This might make people think with an assumption that quality of tooth paste is proportional to the quantity of salt content in it. Hence, this somehow creates customers to the company, who might be potential customers for a company that is manufacturing by far better products. As time rolls on, consumers realize the product with deceiving advertisement and tend to develop aversion towards that brand. In my view, the pitfalls of such advertisements that inadvertently induces a false sense of quality among customers, by far overweigh the potential advantages.
Secondly, it is possible to manipulate the truthful information which might be of no use, to seemingly appear very much useful. Also, an opportunity gained by a company through misdeeds is an opportunity lost to another company. Hence, in a free economy, such advertisements might misdirect people, leading to an abyss in the industry. Hence, there needs to be a panel that reviews every advertisement before it is broadcasted.
In sum, the author provides feeble rationale in allowing companies to make misleading claims while advertising. The thin line that differentiates between truthful but misleading claims and proper claims should be taken care.
_____________
Please rate the essay on a scale of 1-6. I have my test next week. Your suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
06 Nov 2019, 00:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
It do not have any issues. Highly appreciated
13 Nov 2019, 00:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
Aswinraj essay review
Please say what is your view about the proposal? Do you agree or disagree. If you disagree, please s so. This is a serious lapse in you essay. That the Pandora's bo will be opened is an aftermath of the bad advertisements. That will perhaps be part of your rhetoric to scaffold your thesis.
Firstly, it is possible that a company could make a truthful claim which is misunderstood by consumers leading to dissatisfaction among the consumers. For example, a tooth paste manufacturing company advertises that their toothpaste has highest quantity of salt in it. This might make people think with an assumption that quality of tooth paste is proportional to the quantity of salt content in it. Hence, this somehow creates customers to the company, who might be potential customers for a company that is manufacturing by far better products. As time rolls on, consumers realize the product with deceiving advertisement and tend to develop aversion towards that brand. In my view, the pitfalls of such advertisements that inadvertently induces a false sense of quality among customers, by far overweigh the potential advantages.
Secondly, it is possible to manipulate the truthful information which might be of no use, to seemingly appear very much useful. Also, an opportunity gained by a company through misdeeds is an opportunity lost to another company. Hence, in a free economy, such advertisements might misdirect people, leading to an abyss in the industry. Hence, there needs to be a panel that reviews every advertisement before it is broadcasted.
Pl.change into active voice.
In sum, the author provides feeble rationale in allowing companies to make misleading claims while advertising. The thin line that differentiates between truthful but misleading claims and proper claims should be taken care.
_____________
Please rate the essay on a scale of 1-6. I have my test next week. Your suggestions are greatly appreciated.
General comments
Construction-- Your thesis is not there. This is fatal error. Please be categorical in your view and mention it straight with no mincing of words.
Length -- 305 words. Length is too short. Must add another 200 words at least. How can we pick up those extra words.?
You may criticize the proposal for the fallacy of inadequate rhetoric such as lack of statistics, examples, or study reports. You may blast the media people with your own examples or data( pl give some examples such as in a case decided by the Boriville magistrate court in 1947, the judge castigated the Media people.) for misleading people and take them for ride.
The point is that you must be creative to build up your storyline with some arresting anecdotes. Add two or three such points and your essay will make the essay full.
You can end the essay with some striking saying at the end, such as
"Integrity is being true to oneself, honesty is being true to others, but the pity is media lacks both." --- An old observation
Grammar, spelling, and style --- good. However, try to use more visible transitions such as eventually, consequently, untenable, unsustainable, incomprehensible etc.
Flow ---okay
Tone--- can use stronger words.
Rating--- 4.5
Good Luck
Quote:
Please say what is your view about the proposal? Do you agree or disagree. If you disagree, please s so. This is a serious lapse in you essay. That the Pandora's bo will be opened is an aftermath of the bad advertisements. That will perhaps be part of your rhetoric to scaffold your thesis.
Firstly, it is possible that a company could make a truthful claim which is misunderstood by consumers leading to dissatisfaction among the consumers. For example, a tooth paste manufacturing company advertises that their toothpaste has highest quantity of salt in it. This might make people think with an assumption that quality of tooth paste is proportional to the quantity of salt content in it. Hence, this somehow creates customers to the company, who might be potential customers for a company that is manufacturing by far better products. As time rolls on, consumers realize the product with deceiving advertisement and tend to develop aversion towards that brand. In my view, the pitfalls of such advertisements that inadvertently induces a false sense of quality among customers, by far overweigh the potential advantages.
Secondly, it is possible to manipulate the truthful information which might be of no use, to seemingly appear very much useful. Also, an opportunity gained by a company through misdeeds is an opportunity lost to another company. Hence, in a free economy, such advertisements might misdirect people, leading to an abyss in the industry. Hence, there needs to be a panel that reviews every advertisement before it is broadcasted.
Pl.change into active voice.
In sum, the author provides feeble rationale in allowing companies to make misleading claims while advertising. The thin line that differentiates between truthful but misleading claims and proper claims should be taken care.
_____________
Please rate the essay on a scale of 1-6. I have my test next week. Your suggestions are greatly appreciated.
General comments
Construction-- Your thesis is not there. This is fatal error. Please be categorical in your view and mention it straight with no mincing of words.
Length -- 305 words. Length is too short. Must add another 200 words at least. How can we pick up those extra words.?
You may criticize the proposal for the fallacy of inadequate rhetoric such as lack of statistics, examples, or study reports. You may blast the media people with your own examples or data( pl give some examples such as in a case decided by the Boriville magistrate court in 1947, the judge castigated the Media people.) for misleading people and take them for ride.
The point is that you must be creative to build up your storyline with some arresting anecdotes. Add two or three such points and your essay will make the essay full.
You can end the essay with some striking saying at the end, such as
"Integrity is being true to oneself, honesty is being true to others, but the pity is media lacks both." --- An old observation
Grammar, spelling, and style --- good. However, try to use more visible transitions such as eventually, consequently, untenable, unsustainable, incomprehensible etc.
Flow ---okay
Tone--- can use stronger words.
Rating--- 4.5
Good Luck
