The real choice here is about optionality vs. clarity. INSEAD MIM gives you broader geographic reach (Singapore rotation, stronger continental Europe consulting ties, Fontainebleau + Abu Dhabi flexibility). LBS MAM gives you a sharper analytics credential and tighter integration with the London corporate strategy and scale-up ecosystem, which matters if you're leaning toward Europe-based strategy roles post-grad.
You said you want to keep options open, which tilts slightly toward INSEAD. But if you're honest with yourself about where you see yourself working in the first two years after graduation, that answer will clarify the choice. London-based strategy or consulting? LBS has the tighter alumni network and recruiter presence there. Open to Asia or continental Europe consulting? INSEAD wins on reach and rotation.
One question: when you say "corporate/scale-up strategy," are you thinking internal strategy teams at tech companies, or more like growth-stage consulting and advisory? That distinction matters for which network serves you better. The former kind of roles are drying up as we speak, the latter ones are still there, and INSEAD is stronger at helping you get those.
maioresa
I have been accepted into the INSEAD MIM and the LBS MAM (Analytics & Management) but I can't decide between the two...
I'm not 100% sure what career I want after, but probably will try either consulting or corporate/scale-up strategy. I don't need sponsorship to work in EU or UK, so that doesn't matter.
Which one would you choose?