gentlejack
I even read the argument somewhere around here that it might be easier to be stellar at a lower ranked school, which might help one to get the best offers there. Well, I guess nobody can really tell what advantage one would have at one school over the other, as nobody did the MBA at both schools....
This is an interesting question and one, I agree, that no one has a definitive too. My take: a candidate's abilities, augmented by only 1 term of an MBA program, are likely to be very similar to matter where he/she attends school. If you are good enough to get MBB offers at Fuqua, you would be good enough to get MBB offers at Booth (or HBS or wherever). In other words, the difference in offer rates between schools reflects the number of qualified candidates at each. I don't really buy that it would easier to be a big fish in a small pond. Just my $0.02.
MacFauz
I don't know if asking for a scholarship from Booth citing the Fuqua one will work.. Booth are (is it "are" or "is") not known to match scholarships even from peer schools.
I haven't heard of it working, except for schools that are clearly peers or better. That said, it can't hurt to ask. I haven't heard of any revoked offers due to bargaining. In the US, "Booth is." In the UK, I think "Booth are." Not British, so I can't really be sure.
kingfalcon
Also, to defend Atlanta a little bit, the Atlanta offices (and Southern offices in general) for all the firms consistently rank near the top of worldwide happiness and work-life balance rankings.
I concur. I have friends going to 2 of 3 MBB's in ATL either for FT or summer, and they'd run circles around me.
Finally, if you want to go abroad, ask around to see whether that is an option for MBB'ers at Fuqua. My impression from several campus visits was that only candidates from top-10ish schools have unlimited geographic flexibility. Other schools only see regional recruiting.