Yes of course Berkeley is ranked higher but you might want to think about where you want your MBA to take you the connections are you going to need really what it is that you need out of the MBA.??
We shouldn't be thinking about rankings in a blind vacuum but really in context of your goals and your preferences. So it's very possible that having Anderson alumnus around would be more valuable than The Prestige of Cal in your specific situation.
That said, ha, just had 2 entrepreneurship-minded MBAs get into Haas and MMM but they are headed to HBS. If you dont need VC in the future, though, brand might be secondary.
="confidentiality"]Hi, I got into R2 for both schools and contemplating which school to commit to. I saw some old threads but wanted to get input based on my personal details.
Post MBA goals: management consulting. Also considering tech pm
Desired location post MBA: Los Angeles
Current occupation: Presales solutions engineer at a SaaS company. Previously a consulting project lead at the same company.
Cost: Haas (143k) vs Anderson (128k)? Did not receive any scholarships/grants yet. FEMBA seems cheaper. I don't intend to take any loans and pay for tuition on my salary.
Current job is flexible where I can relocate and work anywhere. I work in LA, Westwood. I do like being in the office but it's not required. I am leaning towards FEMBA tues and thurs on this pro alone. This is extremely convenient and I would minimize commuting time if I take a UCLA shuttle after work to get to campus. If Haas, I would try commuting every weekend. Not sure how feasible it is since my Fri and Sat would be shot.
Haas EWMBA has better brand name. But if I want to live in LA afterwards, would it be better to do FEMBA?
How are both programs perceived? Are they considered same tier or is Haas miles better? Especially for tech or consulting?[/quote]
Posted from my mobile device