Last visit was: 29 Apr 2026, 00:25 It is currently 29 Apr 2026, 00:25
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
RichaChampion
User avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2013
Last visit: 02 Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
88
Given Kudos: 82
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V39
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V39
Posts: 70
Kudos: 88
Despite the criticism in the early 1890’s that if journalists use p 22 Jun 2016, 23:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Despite the criticism in the early 1890’s that if journalists use pictures the intellectual quality of publications would diminish, by the late 1890’s photographs were found in most newspapers and magazines.

(A) that if journalists use pictures the intellectual quality of publications would diminish,
(B) that if journalists use pictures it will diminish the intellectual quality of publications,
(C) that the use of pictures by journalists would diminish the intellectual quality of publications,
(D) of the intellectual quality of publications being diminished by the use of pictures by journalists,
(E) of the use of pictures by journalists diminish the intellectual quality of publications,

This is a GMAT Prep Question Pack 1 question. I have few doubts sir.

If_______Then_______

I understand the tenses part of this construction, but I have a doubt in the construction -

If X then Y.

What position can X and Y takes.

1. X and Y should be causes.
2. X and Y can be phrases
3. or X and Y can take some other grammatical constructions.

Condition Y can only be met If X exist.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,892
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,892
 [1]
Despite the criticism in the early 1890’s that if journalists use p 23 Jun 2016, 15:59
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
crunchboss
Despite the criticism in the early 1890’s that if journalists use pictures the intellectual quality of publications would diminish, by the late 1890’s photographs were found in most newspapers and magazines.

(A) that if journalists use pictures the intellectual quality of publications would diminish,
(B) that if journalists use pictures it will diminish the intellectual quality of publications,
(C) that the use of pictures by journalists would diminish the intellectual quality of publications,
(D) of the intellectual quality of publications being diminished by the use of pictures by journalists,
(E) of the use of pictures by journalists diminish the intellectual quality of publications,

This is a GMAT Prep Question Pack 1 question. I have few doubts sir.

If_______Then_______

I understand the tenses part of this construction, but I have a doubt in the construction -

If X then Y.

What position can X and Y takes.

1. X and Y should be causes.
2. X and Y can be phrases
3. or X and Y can take some other grammatical constructions.

Condition Y can only be met If X exist.
Show more
Dear crunchboss,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

In the construction If X, then Y, both X and Y must be full clauses, each with a [subject]+[verb] center. Technically, the word "if" is a subordinate conjunction. Consider this sentence:
If it rains, we won't have the picnic.
The first clause, "if it rains," is a subordinate clause, the after the comma is the independent clause. That's the grammar of the situation.

Here, choice (A) is flawed for other reasons, but in the If X, then Y structure,
X = journalists use pictures
Y = the intellectual quality of publications would diminish

What you said at the end is NOT true: Condition Y can only be met If X exist. Consider the following true statement:
If I am in Berkeley, California, then I am in the United States of America.
X = I am in Berkeley, California
Y = I am in the United States of America
Here, there are thousands of ways to meet condition Y without meeting condition X---one could be in New York City or Chicago or Washington, DC or Santa Fe, New Mexico, to name just a few examples.
If we put "not's" in each statement, or if we simply flip the order around, we don't necessarily get true statements.
If I am in Berkeley, California, then I am in the United States of America. = original true statement
If I am not in Berkeley, California, then I am not in the United States of America. = false
If I am in the United States of America, then I am in Berkeley, California. = false
Notice, though, if we both flip the order around and insert "not's" into each statement, we get another true statement:
If I am not in the United States of America, then I am not in Berkeley, California. = also true
This final transformation is called the contrapositive. The contrapositive of a conditional statement always has the same true value as the original statement: if the original is true, then so is the contrapositive. They can be true together or false together (notice that the two false statements above are contrapositives of each other as well). Another example
If a number is less than -20, then it is negative. = original true statement
If a number is not less than -20, then it is not negative. = false
If a number is negative, then it is less than -20. = false
If a number is not negative, then it is not less than -20. = contrapositive, also true
You do not need to know all this for the GMAT, but it is important to appreciate so you don't make any unnecessary errors.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
RichaChampion
User avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2013
Last visit: 02 Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
88
Given Kudos: 82
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V39
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V39
Posts: 70
Kudos: 88
Despite the criticism in the early 1890’s that if journalists use p 24 Jun 2016, 02:24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
crunchboss
Despite the criticism in the early 1890’s that if journalists use pictures the intellectual quality of publications would diminish, by the late 1890’s photographs were found in most newspapers and magazines.

(A) that if journalists use pictures the intellectual quality of publications would diminish,
(B) that if journalists use pictures it will diminish the intellectual quality of publications,
(C) that the use of pictures by journalists would diminish the intellectual quality of publications,
(D) of the intellectual quality of publications being diminished by the use of pictures by journalists,
(E) of the use of pictures by journalists diminish the intellectual quality of publications,

This is a GMAT Prep Question Pack 1 question. I have few doubts sir.

If_______Then_______

I understand the tenses part of this construction, but I have a doubt in the construction -

If X then Y.

What position can X and Y takes.

1. X and Y should be causes.
2. X and Y can be phrases
3. or X and Y can take some other grammatical constructions.

Condition Y can only be met If X exist.
Dear crunchboss,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

In the construction If X, then Y, both X and Y must be full clauses, each with a [subject]+[verb] center. Technically, the word "if" is a subordinate conjunction. Consider this sentence:
If it rains, we won't have the picnic.
The first clause, "if it rains," is a subordinate clause, the after the comma is the independent clause. That's the grammar of the situation.

Here, choice (A) is flawed for other reasons, but in the If X, then Y structure,
X = journalists use pictures
Y = the intellectual quality of publications would diminish

What you said at the end is NOT true: Condition Y can only be met If X exist. Consider the following true statement:
If I am in Berkeley, California, then I am in the United States of America.
X = I am in Berkeley, California
Y = I am in the United States of America
Here, there are thousands of ways to meet condition Y without meeting condition X---one could be in New York City or Chicago or Washington, DC or Santa Fe, New Mexico, to name just a few examples.
If we put "not's" in each statement, or if we simply flip the order around, we don't necessarily get true statements.
If I am in Berkeley, California, then I am in the United States of America. = original true statement
If I am not in Berkeley, California, then I am not in the United States of America. = false
If I am in the United States of America, then I am in Berkeley, California. = false
Notice, though, if we both flip the order around and insert "not's" into each statement, we get another true statement:
If I am not in the United States of America, then I am not in Berkeley, California. = also true
This final transformation is called the contrapositive. The contrapositive of a conditional statement always has the same true value as the original statement: if the original is true, then so is the contrapositive. They can be true together or false together (notice that the two false statements above are contrapositives of each other as well). Another example
If a number is less than -20, then it is negative. = original true statement
If a number is not less than -20, then it is not negative. = false
If a number is negative, then it is less than -20. = false
If a number is not negative, then it is not less than -20. = contrapositive, also true
You do not need to know all this for the GMAT, but it is important to appreciate so you don't make any unnecessary errors.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Show more


Thanks sir, This is so informative you can convert this into a blog on magoosh. I have one more question sir as you said "Here, there are thousands of ways to meet condition Y without meeting condition X---one could be in New York City or Chicago or Washington, DC or Santa Fe, New Mexico, to name just a few examples. "

Even though there are thousands of ways to meet the condition why, but then what is the connection between X and Y if X is not essential for Y to exist? Did you get my point sir?


If I am in Berkeley, California, then I am in the United States of America.
X = I am in Berkeley, California
Y = I am in the United States of America

The above If Then construction i correct or not?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,892
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,892
 [1]
Despite the criticism in the early 1890’s that if journalists use p 24 Jun 2016, 14:49
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
crunchboss
Thanks sir, This is so informative you can convert this into a blog on magoosh. I have one more question sir as you said "Here, there are thousands of ways to meet condition Y without meeting condition X---one could be in New York City or Chicago or Washington, DC or Santa Fe, New Mexico, to name just a few examples. "

Even though there are thousands of ways to meet the condition why, but then what is the connection between X and Y if X is not essential for Y to exist? Did you get my point sir?

If I am in Berkeley, California, then I am in the United States of America.
X = I am in Berkeley, California
Y = I am in the United States of America

The above If Then construction i correct or not?
Show more
Dear crunchboss,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

First, I'll say the example If-Then statement you gave is grammatically and logically correct. In fact, we can drop the word "then."
If I am in Berkeley, California, I am in the United States of America.

My friend, I want to point out that we are discussing here issues of formal logic, which are wonderful in their own right, but these really are beyond anything you need to know for the GMAT. I will begin with something from mathematics, which might be a little clearer. It's important to appreciate the profound logical asymmetry of the if-then structure.

If a shape is a square, then the shape is a rectangle. = true
This is logically equivalent to the following statement:
Every square is a rectangle. = true

The logical connection between is that if something is a square, it must be a rectangle: there's no way to be a square without also being a rectangle. BUT, and this is important, there are a continuous infinity of possible rectangles that are not squares. The number of rectangles that are not squares infinitely outnumbers the ones that are squares, and yet every square is a rectangle.

In general, if we are given the statement If X, then Y, and if we know that statement is true, then we know that condition X always leads to condition Y and that it is impossible to have condition X without having Y also. At the same time, it leaves open the possibility that there are many other possibilities for condition Y, many other ways for condition Y to exist, without condition X being involved.

With the Berkeley example: if I am in Berkeley, I have to be in the USA; there is absolutely no way I could be in Berkeley and not be in the USA. It would logically equivalent to the statement, "Everyone in Berkeley is in the USA." At the same time, there are 1000s of ways to be in the USA without being in Berkeley.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
RichaChampion
User avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2013
Last visit: 02 Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
88
Given Kudos: 82
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V39
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V39
Posts: 70
Kudos: 88
Despite the criticism in the early 1890’s that if journalists use p 25 Jul 2016, 00:07
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
crunchboss
Thanks sir, This is so informative you can convert this into a blog on magoosh. I have one more question sir as you said "Here, there are thousands of ways to meet condition Y without meeting condition X---one could be in New York City or Chicago or Washington, DC or Santa Fe, New Mexico, to name just a few examples. "

Even though there are thousands of ways to meet the condition why, but then what is the connection between X and Y if X is not essential for Y to exist? Did you get my point sir?

If I am in Berkeley, California, then I am in the United States of America.
X = I am in Berkeley, California
Y = I am in the United States of America

The above If Then construction i correct or not?
Dear crunchboss,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

First, I'll say the example If-Then statement you gave is grammatically and logically correct. In fact, we can drop the word "then."
If I am in Berkeley, California, I am in the United States of America.

My friend, I want to point out that we are discussing here issues of formal logic, which are wonderful in their own right, but these really are beyond anything you need to know for the GMAT. I will begin with something from mathematics, which might be a little clearer. It's important to appreciate the profound logical asymmetry of the if-then structure.

If a shape is a square, then the shape is a rectangle. = true
This is logically equivalent to the following statement:
Every square is a rectangle. = true

The logical connection between is that if something is a square, it must be a rectangle: there's no way to be a square without also being a rectangle. BUT, and this is important, there are a continuous infinity of possible rectangles that are not squares. The number of rectangles that are not squares infinitely outnumbers the ones that are squares, and yet every square is a rectangle.

In general, if we are given the statement If X, then Y, and if we know that statement is true, then we know that condition X always leads to condition Y and that it is impossible to have condition X without having Y also. At the same time, it leaves open the possibility that there are many other possibilities for condition Y, many other ways for condition Y to exist, without condition X being involved.

With the Berkeley example: if I am in Berkeley, I have to be in the USA; there is absolutely no way I could be in Berkeley and not be in the USA. It would logically equivalent to the statement, "Everyone in Berkeley is in the USA." At the same time, there are 1000s of ways to be in the USA without being in Berkeley.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Show more

Mike Mc Garry Sir - Fantatstic! :-D