Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 17:15 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 17:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Blackbox
Joined: 30 May 2012
Last visit: 04 Nov 2017
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 151
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 160
Kudos: 754
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
811,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,080
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dabral
User avatar
Tutor
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 557
Own Kudos:
666
 [2]
Given Kudos: 19
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 557
Kudos: 666
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Blackbox
Joined: 30 May 2012
Last visit: 04 Nov 2017
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 151
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 160
Kudos: 754
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel and Dabral - Thank you both so much for pitching in with your answers. As much as I love knowing multiple solutions, much to my frustration, the inequality concept (for that matter a sizable chunk of math topics is tough for a non-engineer like me) escapes me and when it involves absolute operation, it only gets the best of me. Anywho, please look at the inline attachment and let me know where I am missing it. The reason why I am asking you that is because, I think I fairly understood the method outlined here (inequalities-trick-91482.html#p700500) and now steering into a different direction will only make it worse for me :)

Attachment:
Graph.png
Graph.png [ 38.64 KiB | Viewed 1885 times ]
User avatar
dabral
User avatar
Tutor
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 557
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 557
Kudos: 666
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
When you remove the absolute value sign, say in the first example where you equate \(|x^2-4|=x^2-4\), we also have an additional condition of \(x^2-4>0\), which is equivalent to \(x>2\) or \(x<-2\). You have to superimpose this condition.

As an aside, I do want to point out that I haven't seen such an inequality on the real GMAT exam, and if I had to bet my money then I would say that this problem is not appropriate for the GMAT.

Cheers,
Dabral
User avatar
Blackbox
Joined: 30 May 2012
Last visit: 04 Nov 2017
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 151
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 160
Kudos: 754
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="dabral"] ... additional condition of \(x^2-4>0\)[quote]

I am sorry for being thick, but I still cannot fathom why I have to consider a "> 0" situation when I remove the modulus operator? Clearly, I am missing something here.

TIA.
User avatar
dabral
User avatar
Tutor
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 557
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 557
Kudos: 666
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
When we remove the absolute value condition and say that \(|x^2-3|=x^2-3\), we can only do so when \(x^2-3>0\). Similarly, we say when \(x^2-3<0\), we have \(|x^2-3|=-(x^2-3)\). This is based on the definition of the absolute value.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,442
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,442
Kudos: 79,404
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Blackbox
What is the range of solutions for |x^2 - 4| > 3x ?

When I solved the equation, I got these roots:
(x-4)(x+1) > 0 and (x+4)(x-1) >> inequalities-trick-91482.html#p700500

Thanks!

Responding to a pm:
Right! So the issue with your solution is this:

You have made two quadratics to remove the absolute value:

x^2 - 4 > 3x

and

-(x^2 - 4) > 3x

Mind you, there is a condition attached to removing the absolute value sign.

When do you get |x^2 - 4| = x^2 - 4?
You get it when x^2 - 4 is positive i.e. x^2 - 4 > 0
i.e. when (x-2)(x+2) > 0 i.e. x > 2 or x 4

Similarly, when is |x^2 - 4| = - (x^2 - 4)?
When x^2 - 4 is negative i.e. x^2 - 4 < 0
i.e. when (x-2)(x+2) < 0
So -2 < x < 2
When you solved this inequality, you got x = -4, 1
Note that -4 does not fall in this range so it is not a valid root. You only get x = 1 as a valid root. So for negative values, x < 1

That's how you get the correct answer.

Takeaway:
Never forget the absolute value conditions of
|x| = x if x is positive
|x| = -x if x is negative
When you make two equations to remove the absolute value sign, remember the attached conditions.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!