Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 08:14 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 08:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
jbyx78
Joined: 22 Apr 2016
Last visit: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 16
Kudos: 3
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,456
 [2]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,456
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Divyadisha
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Last visit: 01 Jun 2018
Posts: 660
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 660
Kudos: 1,958
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,008
 [1]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,008
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jbyx78
Hi,

I'm having a hard time understanding the reason for something.

"If Lucy walks to work at a rate of 4 mph, and she walks home by the same route at a rate of 6 mph, what is Lucy's average walking rate for the round trip ?"

So the problem never establishes a specific distance. Apparently, her average walking rate doesn't depend on the distance (I tried with some different values for the distance and yeah I got the same answer every time). But why ? What's the logic behind that ? I can't seem to get it.

Please help ! :shock:

Since you are asking about logic...
the reason is that the Distance being travelled is in terms of same variable say D, which finally gets eliminated

you are travelling the same distance say D in two different speeds ..
so total time = D/4 + D/6 = 5D/12..

and your total distance becomes 2D..... but time is 5D/12..
speed = \(2D/\frac{5D}{12}= 24/5 = 4.8mph\)...
so you see here that the Distance D is eliminated being common to numerator and denominator.....

Of course direct method is as also given by Divyadisha = 2ab/(a+b) = 2*4*6/10 = 4.8mph...
User avatar
adiagr
Joined: 18 Jan 2010
Last visit: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 202
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
Posts: 202
Kudos: 1,155
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jbyx78
Hi,

I'm having a hard time understanding the reason for something.

"If Lucy walks to work at a rate of 4 mph, and she walks home by the same route at a rate of 6 mph, what is Lucy's average walking rate for the round trip ?"

So the problem never establishes a specific distance. Apparently, her average walking rate doesn't depend on the distance (I tried with some different values for the distance and yeah I got the same answer every time). But why ? What's the logic behind that ? I can't seem to get it.

Please help ! :shock:

The issue is that distance eventually cancels out. Let us do it by using algebra

Suppose the distance from Lucy's house to office is "d". Obviously she covers same distance when she returns from her office to her house.

Time taken to reach office: (d/4) hours [assume d is in miles]

Time taken to return: (d/6) hours

Total Distance covered: 2d
Total time: \(\frac{d}{4}+\frac{d}{6}\) = \(\frac{5d}{12}\)

Average speed: 2d/ (5d/12) = [(2 * 12)/ 5]--> Note that d cancels out
User avatar
ccooley
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 931
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 115
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 931
Kudos: 1,658
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Imagine that you have two jobs. At one job, you work for two days a week at $60 an hour, and at the other job, you work for three days a week at $40 an hour. You'll make a certain amount of money per week, and you can also work out the average amount that you make per hour over the whole week. After one week, you'll have made a certain average number of dollars per hour (somewhere between 40 and 60). After two weeks, that average will be the same, as long as your hours stay the same. After three weeks, same thing. You won't suddenly start making more or less money on average, no matter how many weeks you work for in total, unless your hours change.

In this analogy, the $60/hour job corresponds to walking faster, and the $40/hour job corresponds to walking slower. As long as the amount of time you spend walking faster and the amount of time you spend walking slower stay in the same proportion to each other, your average speed will always stay the same. It doesn't matter whether you walk for a total of one minute, ten minutes, or a week. What matters is that out of every minute (or hour, or whatever), you spend a fixed part of it walking more slowly on average, and a fixed part of it walking more quickly.

A second aspect of this problem that's hard to understand intuitively, is why the result comes out closer to 4mph than to 6mph. It seems like it should be 5mph, logically. The reason it isn't is because you actually spend significantly more time walking at 4mph, so the 4mph affects the average more. To take it to an extreme, imagine taking a 3,000 mile trip in an airplane going one way at 500mph, then getting off the plane and returning on foot at 3mph. You couldn't logically say that you averaged (3000+3)/2 = 1501.5 mph, because that would be a very fast average speed. In fact, your average speed would be very slow, which makes intuitive sense, since the entire trip would clearly take a very long time.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!