Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
I'm having a hard time understanding the reason for something.
"If Lucy walks to work at a rate of 4 mph, and she walks home by the same route at a rate of 6 mph, what is Lucy's average walking rate for the round trip ?"
So the problem never establishes a specific distance. Apparently, her average walking rate doesn't depend on the distance (I tried with some different values for the distance and yeah I got the same answer every time). But why ? What's the logic behind that ? I can't seem to get it.
Please help !
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The main idea is that the person traveling a certain distance at 4 mph will take 50% longer than a person traveling the same distance at 6 mph. So, the distance is irrelevant. This video covers average speeds in greater detail:
I'm having a hard time understanding the reason for something.
"If Lucy walks to work at a rate of 4 mph, and she walks home by the same route at a rate of 6 mph, what is Lucy's average walking rate for the round trip ?"
So the problem never establishes a specific distance. Apparently, her average walking rate doesn't depend on the distance (I tried with some different values for the distance and yeah I got the same answer every time). But why ? What's the logic behind that ? I can't seem to get it.
Please help !
Show more
Hi! There are two ways.
1st Way- Let's suppose distance = d, so the total distance going to work and coming back = d+d= 2d Total time= Time to go to work +time to come back = d/4+d/6
Average speed= total distance/total time
2d/d/4+d/6= 2*4*6/10= 4.5 m/h
2nd way- when the distance travelled is same, we can apply direct formula 2S1S2/S1+S2= 2*4*6/4+6= 4.5m/h
I'm having a hard time understanding the reason for something.
"If Lucy walks to work at a rate of 4 mph, and she walks home by the same route at a rate of 6 mph, what is Lucy's average walking rate for the round trip ?"
So the problem never establishes a specific distance. Apparently, her average walking rate doesn't depend on the distance (I tried with some different values for the distance and yeah I got the same answer every time). But why ? What's the logic behind that ? I can't seem to get it.
Please help !
Show more
Since you are asking about logic... the reason is that the Distance being travelled is in terms of same variable say D, which finally gets eliminated
you are travelling the same distance say D in two different speeds .. so total time = D/4 + D/6 = 5D/12..
and your total distance becomes 2D..... but time is 5D/12.. speed = \(2D/\frac{5D}{12}= 24/5 = 4.8mph\)... so you see here that the Distance D is eliminated being common to numerator and denominator.....
Of course direct method is as also given by Divyadisha = 2ab/(a+b) = 2*4*6/10 = 4.8mph...
I'm having a hard time understanding the reason for something.
"If Lucy walks to work at a rate of 4 mph, and she walks home by the same route at a rate of 6 mph, what is Lucy's average walking rate for the round trip ?"
So the problem never establishes a specific distance. Apparently, her average walking rate doesn't depend on the distance (I tried with some different values for the distance and yeah I got the same answer every time). But why ? What's the logic behind that ? I can't seem to get it.
Please help !
Show more
The issue is that distance eventually cancels out. Let us do it by using algebra
Suppose the distance from Lucy's house to office is "d". Obviously she covers same distance when she returns from her office to her house.
Time taken to reach office: (d/4) hours [assume d is in miles]
Time taken to return: (d/6) hours
Total Distance covered: 2d Total time: \(\frac{d}{4}+\frac{d}{6}\) = \(\frac{5d}{12}\)
Average speed: 2d/ (5d/12) = [(2 * 12)/ 5]--> Note that d cancels out
Imagine that you have two jobs. At one job, you work for two days a week at $60 an hour, and at the other job, you work for three days a week at $40 an hour. You'll make a certain amount of money per week, and you can also work out the average amount that you make per hour over the whole week. After one week, you'll have made a certain average number of dollars per hour (somewhere between 40 and 60). After two weeks, that average will be the same, as long as your hours stay the same. After three weeks, same thing. You won't suddenly start making more or less money on average, no matter how many weeks you work for in total, unless your hours change.
In this analogy, the $60/hour job corresponds to walking faster, and the $40/hour job corresponds to walking slower. As long as the amount of time you spend walking faster and the amount of time you spend walking slower stay in the same proportion to each other, your average speed will always stay the same. It doesn't matter whether you walk for a total of one minute, ten minutes, or a week. What matters is that out of every minute (or hour, or whatever), you spend a fixed part of it walking more slowly on average, and a fixed part of it walking more quickly.
A second aspect of this problem that's hard to understand intuitively, is why the result comes out closer to 4mph than to 6mph. It seems like it should be 5mph, logically. The reason it isn't is because you actually spend significantly more time walking at 4mph, so the 4mph affects the average more. To take it to an extreme, imagine taking a 3,000 mile trip in an airplane going one way at 500mph, then getting off the plane and returning on foot at 3mph. You couldn't logically say that you averaged (3000+3)/2 = 1501.5 mph, because that would be a very fast average speed. In fact, your average speed would be very slow, which makes intuitive sense, since the entire trip would clearly take a very long time.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.