Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
if: a/b = c/d (a,b,c,d non zero real numbers), it is given that: 1. (a+b)/(a-b) = (c+d)/(c-d)
Clarification 1: Now 1. above can only be true if a is not equal to b or (a-b) is not zero ..right? (this is not mentioned in the book) How did we (algebraically) arrive at this equivalency?
Clarification 2: can we also claim that: (a-b)/(a+b) = (c-d)/(c+d) ?
Thanks
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Clarification 1: Now 1. above can only be true if a is not equal to b or (a-b) is not zero ..right? (this is not mentioned in the book) How did we (algebraically) arrive at this equivalency? - Here the book only gives the rule that can be applied to ratios. Incase a-b=0, a=b, ratio is 1, so there's no need to go for componendo dividendo. It is useful to apply in some problems directly. \(\frac{a}{b}\) = \(\frac{c}{d}\) =>Adding and subtracting 1 from both sides; \(\frac{a}{b}\)+1=\(\frac{c}{d}\)+1 = \(\frac{(a+b)}{b}\)=\(\frac{(c+d)}{d}\) -------(1) \(\frac{a}{b}\)-1=\(\frac{c}{d}\)-1 = \(\frac{(a-b)}{b}\)=\(\frac{(c-d)}{d}\)--------(2) Dividing (1) by (2) gives the desired result.
Clarification 2: can we also claim that: \(\frac{(a-b)}{(a+b)}\) = \(\frac{(c-d)}{(c+d)}\) ? Yes. As it is inverse of the ratio.
Please give kudos, if u liked my post!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.