Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
14 Apr 2020, 08:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello, today I took sample test on manhattan prep and in quant got 47 with 10 mistakes, but from 31-22 was 700-800 difficulty and i got 9 wrong from them, I feel like 47 is too low can someone explain me pls? Thanks
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
14 Apr 2020, 10:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
Misho13
Hello, Misho13. Manhattan Prep has designed its own scoring algorithm, so it is impossible to know for sure how your score was generated. You may have missed an Easy question somewhere that affected your score more than some of those harder questions, or perhaps you missed more questions earlier, and the MGMAT program weights those mistakes more heavily. Rather than focus too much on why the outcome is unfair or below your expectations, why not take the opportunity to sit down and study the questions you missed, seeking to identify weaknesses in approach, timing, or conceptual knowledge that had caused you to falter? I guarantee if you keep working at improving your test-taking sharpness, your score will increase. One final note: although Manhattan Prep offers high-quality questions and CATs, they are not the same as those generated by GMAC™. You will get a much better indicator of your eventual score by practicing official CATs. (The first two are free through mba.com, if you have not buzzed through them already.)
Good luck with your studies.
- Andrew
globaldesi
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Last visit: 23 Feb 2026
Posts: 1,141
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
GPA: 3.97
WE:Project Management (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
18 Apr 2020, 12:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
question numbers are not a clear indicator for how many you did wrong.
What about the ones you just solved before if most below 32 were of 600-700 range?
What about the ones you just solved before if most below 32 were of 600-700 range?
