Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 02:41 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 02:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Vasudha
Joined: 08 Sep 2006
Last visit: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 17
Posts: 17
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
querio
Joined: 11 Nov 2006
Last visit: 19 Jun 2007
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Posts: 67
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Himalayan
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Posts: 383
Kudos: 633
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
querio
Joined: 11 Nov 2006
Last visit: 19 Jun 2007
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Posts: 67
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="Himalayan"]x + 1.1 x(10) = 132000
x = 11,000[/quote]

Hi Himalayan,

Can you please explain your reasoning to get to the value of 11,000? Your numbers seem to be much nicer than mines :) so I wonder why my reasoning is incorrect?
Thanks!
User avatar
Himalayan
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Posts: 383
Kudos: 633
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
querio
Quote:
x + 1.1 x(10) = 132000
x = 11,000

Hi Himalayan,

Can you please explain your reasoning to get to the value of 11,000? Your numbers seem to be much nicer than mines :) so I wonder why my reasoning is incorrect?
Thanks!


if you tale x as the larger/largest and 0.9 as the smaler/smallest, the the difference could be grater than 10%. in your case, 10% of 1211 is correct. (calculate difference as % of both 10900 and 1211).

But if you take the difference as the % of 10900, then it is greater than 10%, which is not correct.

In my case, the difference is 10% or less than x (11000).
User avatar
voltron
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Last visit: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 6
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Its always good to see how these types of problems can be simplified. I made this much more complicated on myself as I was plugging in each solution and narrowing down that way.

I think the formula is really:

x + (10) (1.1x) >= 132000

Really you just want to make sure that the 10 districts which have a population above the min population district can absorb the remaining population.

So if the min population is 11000, can the remaining districts absorb the remaining 121000 population without any one district going over 12100 (11000(1.1)).



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!