brokerbevo
I agree, yet the official answer is A. These kind of pseudo-subjective questions that are open to interpretation are what scare me come test time. If I had the chance to explain my answers once the test was done, I could easily bump my score up 50 points.
Can you point out a single real GMAT question (from the OG, GMATPrep, or GMATFocus) that is ambiguous in its wording? GMAC spends $2400 designing each question in part to avoid any ambiguity; ambiguity eliminates any value a question might have on the GMAT, because an ambiguous question won't be answered much better by good test takers than by bad ones. So an ambiguous question does not give much information about your ability, and is essentially useless in helping to determine your score. If you did see a truly ambiguous question on your real GMAT (though I can assure you that you won't), it could only be a diagnostic question, because any ambiguously worded question would be discarded once calibration data was collected on it- the question would not provide good data.
And while I get your point about the above question, I'd interpret it the same way as GMATTiger; the question appears to intend for a, b and c to represent the three different dimensions of the box. I can't imagine you'd see a real GMAT question with that exact wording, however.