Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 03:55 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 03:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
MasterGMAT12
Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Last visit: 09 Jan 2011
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
108
 [67]
Schools:Wharton, Columbia, Booth, NYU
Posts: 10
Kudos: 108
 [67]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
60
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
EvaJager
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 513
Own Kudos:
2,370
 [25]
Given Kudos: 43
WE:Science (Education)
Posts: 513
Kudos: 2,370
 [25]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vad3tha
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Last visit: 15 Dec 2023
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
584
 [11]
Given Kudos: 148
Posts: 106
Kudos: 584
 [11]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
shrouded1
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Last visit: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
3,230
 [4]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
Products:
Posts: 608
Kudos: 3,230
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MasterGMAT12
What should be the approach to do the below question?

How many positive integers less than 20 can be expressed
as the sum of a positive multiple of 2 and a positive multiple
of 3?
(A) 14
(B) 13
(C) 12
(D) 11
(E) 10

We are looking at the set {1,2,3,4,5,...,19}
So all numbers of the form 2+3k (where k>=1) can be considered {5,8,11,14,17} - set 1
Similarly 4+3k (k>=1) gets us {7,10,13,16,19} - set 2
6+3k (k>=1) gets us {9,12,15,18} - set 3
8+3k (k>=1) : already in set 1
10+3k (k>=1) : already in set 2
12+3k (k>=1) : already in set 3
14+3k (k>=1) : already in set 1
16+3k (k>=1) : already in set 2
18+3k (k>=1) : already in set 3

So the full list is {5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19} which is 14 numbers
User avatar
docabuzar
Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Last visit: 21 Mar 2012
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V31
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V31
Posts: 37
Kudos: 1,041
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shrouded1
MasterGMAT12
What should be the approach to do the below question?

How many positive integers less than 20 can be expressed
as the sum of a positive multiple of 2 and a positive multiple
of 3?
(A) 14
(B) 13
(C) 12
(D) 11
(E) 10

We are looking at the set {1,2,3,4,5,...,19}
So all numbers of the form 2+3k (where k>=1) can be considered {5,8,11,14,17} - set 1
Similarly 4+3k (k>=1) gets us {7,10,13,16,19} - set 2
6+3k (k>=1) gets us {9,12,15,18} - set 3
8+3k (k>=1) : already in set 1
10+3k (k>=1) : already in set 2
12+3k (k>=1) : already in set 3
14+3k (k>=1) : already in set 1
16+3k (k>=1) : already in set 2
18+3k (k>=1) : already in set 3

So the full list is {5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19} which is 14 numbers

Thanks for the Questions & Answer.

The mistake I did was that I constructed the equation as
Number = 2n+3n [i.e. 5,10,15] so my answer was "3" which was not there in the options. So I realized I m doing st wrong but I could not figure out until I saw the solution above.

The only problem was for me, above solution will take >2 min. Then I realized we can stop at 6+3k , because the # of numbers are already 14 ; the greatest answer option. Is there any other clue to look for?
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,808
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 678
Posts: 1,808
Kudos: 2,090
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shrouded1
MasterGMAT12
What should be the approach to do the below question?

How many positive integers less than 20 can be expressed
as the sum of a positive multiple of 2 and a positive multiple
of 3?
(A) 14
(B) 13
(C) 12
(D) 11
(E) 10

We are looking at the set {1,2,3,4,5,...,19}
So all numbers of the form 2+3k (where k>=1) can be considered {5,8,11,14,17} - set 1
Similarly 4+3k (k>=1) gets us {7,10,13,16,19} - set 2
6+3k (k>=1) gets us {9,12,15,18} - set 3
8+3k (k>=1) : already in set 1
10+3k (k>=1) : already in set 2
12+3k (k>=1) : already in set 3
14+3k (k>=1) : already in set 1
16+3k (k>=1) : already in set 2
18+3k (k>=1) : already in set 3

So the full list is {5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19} which is 14 numbers


although this solution is very helpful, but still I find the question a bit strange, without the solution it is almost impossible
to understand what the question is asking, I tried 2x + 3 and 2+3x as the number of elements, still no luck .

Can anybody make another attempt at this, thank you
User avatar
ankur1901
Joined: 23 May 2013
Last visit: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 109
Posts: 72
Kudos: 293
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
we are looking for all positive numbers less than 20. That means we have 19 numbers.
Now, 1,2,3 and 4 can never be expressed as sum of 2 and 3. So we are left with 15 numbers.

By this time i already had spent around 3 min and had to take a shot, so i guessed it to 14.

Btw, i never came across an explanation where people would just guess the answers. I read that guessing is one of the skills that we need to master.
Anymore inputs to guessing will be welcomed
User avatar
gmatser1
Joined: 07 Feb 2015
Last visit: 16 Jan 2016
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 44
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't understand this one. According to Bunuel here https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-0-zero-to-be-considered-as-a-multiple-of-every-number-104179.html, zero is a multiple of all numbers. Doesn't that mean the answer to this should be 19 (all are multiples except for one).
User avatar
DmitryFarberMPrep
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,005
Own Kudos:
8,624
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,005
Kudos: 8,624
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatser1, note that the problem specifies that we are dealing with positive multiples, so we don't need to consider 0. Otherwise, you would have a point. You'll find that little specifications like that (positive, not zero, integer, odd, even, etc.) are very important to take note of!
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,381
 [3]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,381
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MasterGMAT12
How many positive integers less than 20 can be expressed as the sum of a positive multiple of 2 and a positive multiple of 3?

(A) 14
(B) 13
(C) 12
(D) 11
(E) 10

Responding to a pm:

I would do this question by enumerating and using pattern recognition.

Note that we need the number to be the sum of a positive multiple of 2 and a positive multiple of 3.
The first such number will be 5 (which is 2 + 3).
Now, every time we add one or more 2s and/or one or more 3s to 5, we will will one of our desired numbers.

\(5 +2 = 7\)

\(5+3 = 8\)

\(5 + 2*2 = 5 + 4 = 9\)

\(5 + 2 + 3 = 5 + 5 = 10\)

5 + 4 + 2 = 11

5 + 4 + 3 = 12

... Note that you will get all other numbers because the new base number is 5 + 4 = 9 now. You can add 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Thereafter, we can consider the new base to be 14 and then again add 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 and so on...
So all numbers including and after 7 can be written in the form 2a + 3b.

In the first 19 positive integers, there are only 5 numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 6) which you cannot express as 2a + 3b such that a and b are positive integers.
SO 14 numbers can be written as a sum of a positive multiple of 2 and a positive multiple of 3.

Answer (A)
avatar
sauravpaul
Joined: 01 May 2015
Last visit: 02 Jan 2017
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
158
 [6]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 32
Kudos: 158
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Positive multiple of 2 = 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20
positive multiple of 3 = 3,6,9,12,15,18

So, various sums = 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 9, 12, 15, 18

This is a total of 14.
User avatar
MIHI95
Joined: 05 Nov 2019
Last visit: 01 Feb 2023
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 557
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think it can be done very simply with the help of this equation ..
2a+3b .....the highest possible value of a we can plug ( assuming the lowest value of b which is b=1) is '8' likewise, the highest value of 'b' can be 6 ( assuming..... a=1)
8+6 =14

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
MIHI95
Joined: 05 Nov 2019
Last visit: 01 Feb 2023
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 557
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think it can be done very simply with the help of this equation ..
2a+3b .....the highest possible value of a we can plug ( assuming the lowest value of b which is b=1) is '8' likewise, the highest value of 'b' can be 6
(assuming..... a=1)
8+6 =14

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
febinlaw
Joined: 09 Mar 2020
Last visit: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MIHI95

Please explain why 6 is the highest value for b since 2(1) + 3(6) = 20 but the question says the number is less than 20.
User avatar
DmitryFarberMPrep
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,005
Own Kudos:
8,624
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,005
Kudos: 8,624
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
febinlaw Actually, the 2a + 3b approach doesn't work as presented. First, as you say, b can't be 6. Second, there isn't any clear meaning to adding the two potential values. Just knowing the number of values for each variable doesn't allow us to add them and get a total range of values for the expression. For each value of a, only certain values of b are allowed. For instance, if a=1, b can be anything from 1 to 5, but if a=3, b can only range from 1 to 4. Even then, we can't just count up all the values or we'll end up with more than 19 numbers! We have to take out the overlap. We're much better off working with the actual numbers from 1 to 19.
User avatar
DmitryFarberMPrep
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,005
Own Kudos:
8,624
 [2]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,005
Kudos: 8,624
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here's a fairly quick solution. Start by listing out the relevant multiples of 3:

3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18

If we start with 3, we see that we can keep adding multiples of 2 to generate all the odd values above 3: 5, 7, 9, 11, . . .
If we start with 6, we can proceed in the same way to get all the evens above 6: 8, 10, 12 . . .

Since we've covered both the odds and the evens, the only numbers left out are the odds below 5 (1,3) and the evens below 8 (2,4,6). The other 14 numbers all work.
User avatar
BrushMyQuant
Joined: 05 Apr 2011
Last visit: 03 Apr 2026
Posts: 2,286
Own Kudos:
2,678
 [3]
Given Kudos: 100
Status:Tutor - BrushMyQuant
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: XLRI (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: XLRI (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
Posts: 2,286
Kudos: 2,678
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need to find How many positive integers less than 20 can be expressed as the sum of a positive multiple of 2 and a positive multiple of 3

Let's try to express each number from 5 to 19 as a positive multiple of 2 and 3
We are considering only between 5 and 19 because
- 5 is the least number which can be formed with positive multiples of 2 and 3
- 19 because we need to find numbers less than 20

Using following format: Number = multiple of 2 + multiple of 3

5 = 2 + 3
6 = NOT POSSIBLE to express
7 = 4 + 3
8 = 2 + 6
9 = 6 + 3
10 = 4 + 6
11 = 8 + 3
12 = 6 + 6
13 = 10 + 3
14 = 8 + 6
15 = 12 + 3
16 = 10 + 6
17 = 14 + 3
18 = 12 + 6
19 = 16 + 3

Total numbers = (19-5 + 1 ) - 1 = 14

So, Answer will be A
Hope it helps!

Watch the following video to learn How to Sequence problems

User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,957
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,957
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109740 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts