Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
67%
(02:33)
correct 33%
(02:13)
wrong
based on 64
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
This year, MBB Consulting fired 5% of its employees and left remaining employee salaries unchanged. Sally, a first-year post-MBA consultant, noticed that that the average (arithmetic mean) of employee salaries at MBB was 10% more after the employee headcount reduction than before. The total salary pool allocated to employees after headcount reduction is what percent of that before the headcount reduction?
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
This year, MBB Consulting fired 5% of its employees and left remaining employee salaries unchanged. Sally, a first-year post-MBA consultant, noticed that that the average (arithmetic mean) of employee salaries at MBB was 10% more after the employee headcount reduction than before. The total salary pool allocated to employees after headcount reduction is what percent of that before the headcount reduction?
(A) 98.5%
(B) 100.0%
(C) 102.8%
(D) 104.5%
(E) 105.0%
---------- Did you try this? How about +KUDOS for me?
Show more
I plugged in numbers... 100 employees, each earning 1$. After the cut, 95 are left, each earning 1.1$. 1.1*95 = 104.5 100*1 = 100 This gives you the answer.
This year, MBB Consulting fired 5% of its employees and left remaining employee salaries unchanged. Sally, a first-year post-MBA consultant, noticed that that the average (arithmetic mean) of employee salaries at MBB was 10% more after the employee headcount reduction than before. The total salary pool allocated to employees after headcount reduction is what percent of that before the headcount reduction?
I solved it as follows: 100 employees getting 1000$ avg, so total salary for 100 ppl = 100000 5% reduction in employees lead to 95 employees and a salary increase of 10% of previous avg salary Thus the new avg salary is = 10%(1000)+1000 = 1100 so total salary of 95 employees is 95*1100 = 104500
Now the new salary is more than previous salary by x%. x = (104500/100000)*100 = 104.5%
This year, MBB Consulting fired 5% of its employees and left remaining employee salaries unchanged. Sally, a first-year post-MBA consultant, noticed that that the average (arithmetic mean) of employee salaries at MBB was 10% more after the employee headcount reduction than before. The total salary pool allocated to employees after headcount reduction is what percent of that before the headcount reduction?
---------- Did you try this? How about +KUDOS for me?
" and left remaining employee salaries unchanged" makes the question a little confusing since the salaries did indeed change.
Show more
The salaries didn't change, just the average. The question didn't state that all the consultants had the same salary, therefore removing a few employees could change the average without changing the individual salaries.
This year, MBB Consulting fired 5% of its employees and left remaining employee salaries unchanged. Sally, a first-year post-MBA consultant, noticed that that the average (arithmetic mean) of employee salaries at MBB was 10% more after the employee headcount reduction than before. The total salary pool allocated to employees after headcount reduction is what percent of that before the headcount reduction?
---------- Did you try this? How about +KUDOS for me?
Show more
This question is either wrong or ambiguous. If the salary of the remaining employees in unchanged, there is no way that the average salary can increase by 10%.
When you fire employees and keep others' salaries same, your total salary pool reduces. How can it be 104.5% of the previous pool? In this case, obviously, the salary of remaining employees has increased.
Say, there were 100 employees and their average salary was $100. So total salary pool = 10,000 Now when some employees go away, the total salary pool must go down. What is the maximum increase possible in average salary? This will happen if the employees who were removed had very low income. Say, they earned close to $0. So the total salary pool would still be $10,000 but there would be only 95 employees. This will give an average salary of 10,000/95 = 105.26. So the average salary can increase by a maximum of 5.26% when 5% employees are taken away, not by 10%.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.