Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 22:32 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 22:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
IntegrityHurricane
Joined: 04 Apr 2013
Last visit: 15 Sep 2016
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
13
 [8]
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 4
Kudos: 13
 [8]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MKS
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Last visit: 19 Oct 2018
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
126
 [1]
Given Kudos: 48
Posts: 64
Kudos: 126
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
himanshujovi
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Last visit: 29 Aug 2016
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 139
Kudos: 77
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Ashishmathew01081987
Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Last visit: 07 Jun 2020
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
313
 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Status:I am not a product of my circumstances. I am a product of my decisions
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GPA: 3.92
WE:Operations (Energy)
Posts: 92
Kudos: 313
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gughanbose
What are the values of n that satisfy the condition 1/|n| > n?

(A) 0<n<1 (and) - infinity < n < 0
(B) 0 < n < infinity (or) -infinity < n < -1
(C) 0 < n < 1 (and) -1 < n < 0
(D) - infinity < n < 0 (or) 0 < n < 1
(E) 0<n<1 (or) - infinity < n < 0

Please provide explanation for the answer.

I am confused with the (and) and (or) in inequalities. Can anyone explain when to use (and) & (or) between conditions?

IMO Answer is A

Explanation :
Mod (n) is always positive i.e. modulus of any integer is always positive.
Now the question asks to find conditions where 1/ Mod (N) > N

1 ) Consider case when 0<N<1,
Here N is positive proper fraction,

Assume N = 1/2, then
1/ Mod (1/2) = 1/ (1/2) = 2
2>1;
hence 1/ Mod (N) > N

2) Consider case when -infinity < N < 0

Assume N = -1, then Assume N = -1/2, then
1/ Mod (-1) = 1/1 = 1 1/Mod (-1/2) = 1/ (1/2) = 2
1 > -1; 2 > -1/2
hence 1/ Mod (N) > N hence 1/ Mod (N) > N


In short whenever a question does not state explicitly that a number is either positive or negative and integer or fraction, test the following numbers -2, -3/2, -1, -1/2, 0, 1/2, 1, 2, 3/2. Ensure you apply the restrictions given in the problem.

Use "AND" when all the test numbers in the given restrictions are true. Use "OR" when either case is true. Here we are sure that all numbers in Option A satisfy the given condition hence the "and" option i.e. Option A is correct.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,044
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

While the general concepts involved in this question WILL show up on your GMAT, this prompt is poorly-written (and Answers D and E are the SAME answer, just written differently). There are plenty of properly-written questions that you can practice inequalities, ranges, absolute value, etc. on, so I would suggest that you skip this question.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
seemachandran
Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Last visit: 24 Sep 2016
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 107
Posts: 30
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello

Can someone please clarify this sum, its still not clear to me.

Thanks.
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,889
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
seemachandran
Hello

Can someone please clarify this sum, its still not clear to me.

Thanks.

You are asked about the values that satisfy \(\frac{1}{|n|}>n\)

The steps are as follows:

Realize that |a|=a for a\(\geq\) 0 and
|a|=-a for a<0.

In the given question, it is implied that n \(\neq\) 0 as this will make 1/|n| undefined.

Thus, \(\frac{1}{|n|}>n\) ---> consider 2 cases:

1. For n>0 : |n|=n --> \(\frac{1}{|n|}>n\) --> \(\frac{1}{n}>n\) ---> n^2<1 (you could multiply through by n as n>0) ---> n^2-1<0 --> -1<n<1 but as n>0, this gives you the common range of n as 0<n<1.

2. for n<0 : |n|=-n ---> \(\frac{1}{|n|}>n\) -->\(\frac{1}{-n}>n\) ---> \(\frac{1}{-n}-n>0\) (do not multiply throughout by n as it is now a negative number (n<0) and as such the sign of the inequality changes when you multiply by a negative number.

Thus you get, \(\frac{1}{-n}-n>0\) --> \(\frac{-1-n^2}{n}>0\) ---> \(\frac{1+n^2}{n}<0\), as n^2+1 is always >0 , \(\frac{1+n^2}{n}<0\) gives n<0.

Thus the common range for this scenario is n<0.

Combining both sets of ranges (from 1 and 2) , you get n<0 and 0<n<1.

Hence A is the correct answer.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
seemachandran
Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Last visit: 24 Sep 2016
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 107
Posts: 30
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks Engr2012 for the reply. Understood both the cases.
However I am having trouble understanding these inequalities especially with mods.
In case if I multiply with -1 then inequality should be 1<-n^2 -- Why cant I solve this way?

I understand the ranges taken for quadratic equations & e.gs from mathworkbook but this problem with reciprocal & mod seems to be different.

Others in the group- please also pitch in for help.
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,889
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
seemachandran
Thanks Engr2012 for the reply. Understood both the cases.
However I am having trouble understanding these inequalities especially with mods.
In case if I multiply with -1 then inequality should be 1<-n^2 -- Why cant I solve this way?

I understand the ranges taken for quadratic equations & e.gs from mathworkbook but this problem with reciprocal & mod seems to be different.

Others in the group- please also pitch in for help.

It is because you can not multiply an inequality by a negative number without reversing the inequality. This is a very important rule to remember.

If you are given that a<b and you multiple both sides by -1, then it becomes -a>-b and NOT -a<-b. This is because if lets say a=4 and b=5, then you have a<b but -a=-4 and -b=-5 , in this case you end up getting -4 > -5.

This is the reason why you can not solve this question (or any inequality question) by multiplying with -1 and NOT changing the sign of inequality.

Additonally, if lets say what you are mentioning is correct, then you get \(-n^2>\)1 ---> \(n^2<\)-1 NOT POSSIBLE as \(n^2\) will always be \(\geq\) 0

Hope this helps.
User avatar
seemachandran
Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Last visit: 24 Sep 2016
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 107
Posts: 30
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks Engr2012 for the detailed explanation, i went thru inequality basics again , got the concept.

When we get value n<0 is it equivalent to -infinity <n< 0?
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,889
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="seemachandran"]Thanks Engr2012 for the detailed explanation, i went thru inequality basics again , got the concept.

When we get value n0 is 0>n>+inf

Hope this helps.

--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--

THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION.
This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.


If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,957
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,957
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderator:
Math Expert
109739 posts