Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Originally posted by zubair123 on 14 Jan 2019, 11:09.
Last edited by zubair123 on 15 Jan 2019, 11:12, edited 1 time in total.
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Show timer
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
a31%
b21%
c24%
d0%
e24%
A
B
C
D
E
Hide
Show
History
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
31%
(03:41)
correct 69%
(03:21)
wrong
based on 29
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Attachment:
QS429.png
Triangles AED and BEC are formed using the straight lines AB and CD as shown in the figure above. If \(BE = BC, DE^2 > AD^2 + AE^2\) and the measure of \(∠AED\) is x, which of the following statements must be true?
I. \(CE^2 > 2BE^2\) II. \(AE < AD\) III. \(DE > CE\)
A) I only
B) II only
C) III only
D) I, II and III
E) None of the above
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Let's label the figure from the given information:
1.1) \(∠DAE\) = (180-3x) from lower triangle
1.2) Since E is the intersection point of two lines, \(∠BEC\) = \(∠AED\) = x
1.3) Since BE = BC, \(∠ECB\) = \(∠BCE\) = x
1.4) \(∠EBC\) = 180-2x
1.5) Since \(DE^2 > AD^2 + AE^2\), we know that angle opposite to side DE is > 90 degrees and it is an obtuse triangle. So angle opposite to DE is \(∠DAE\) which from 1.1 is 180-3x.
So 180-3x >90, and x <30
2) Evaluating each statement independently:
Now that we have established our pre-thinking, let's evaluate each statement:
I) \(CE^2 > 2BE^2\) which is the same as \(CE^2 > BE^2 + BC^2\) since BE = BC
Now for the above inequality to be true, angle opposing CE should be greater than 90, which means 190-2x should be greater than 90 , we already know that x <30, so 180-2x should be less than 120.
Hence sufficient condition. I is true.
II) AE <AD
we know that angle opposing AD is greater than angle opposing side AE, so the above inequality cannot be true.
III) AE > AD
we know that angles opposing each side is proportional to that side length. So angle opposing AE = 180-3x and angle opposing AD is 180-2x. Under all circumstances. 180-3x < 180-2x,
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.