Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
Request you to please share your thoughts on the below two sentences.
1) They contended that the committee was biased and that it should be disbanded.
2) They contended that the committee was biased and it should be disbanded.
Just wanted to make sure, if we can remove "that" from the second sentence without any ambiguity. Please explain. I have seen official questions following the same sentence structure.
Thanks Himanshu
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Moreover, adding an excerpt by Stacey Koprince of MGMAT - this is what she says about the below sentence-
Quote:
I think that X and that Y. I think that the GMAT is hard and that I should study a lot.
In the example I just gave, the sentence is so short that we could probably get away with "I think that the GMAT is hard and I should study a lot." When the sentence is really copmlex though (like the one we did above), then the presence of the word "that" at the beginning of both X and Y makes it very clear to me what X and Y are - and I might not be able to figure that out otherwise.
They contended that the committee was biased and it should be disbanded.
Show more
the reason why it is wrong is because it is missing logical parallelism. parallelism is of two types :structural and logical .while this sentence it structurally parallel but logically it is trying to connect two weird and independent ideas !! this is not acceptable
Request you to please share your thoughts on the below two sentences.
1) They contended that the committee was biased and that it should be disbanded.
2) They contended that the committee was biased and it should be disbanded.
Just wanted to make sure, if we can remove "that" from the second sentence without any ambiguity. Please explain. I have seen official questions following the same sentence structure.
Thanks Himanshu
Show more
Himanshu, Good question. IMO, we should retain the "that" to establish the parallelism clearly. So I would write sentence 1) instead of 2). However, that being said, if you have seen constructions similar to 2) in official questions, then you should bring those up here so that we have a much closer look at them and justify the same on solid grounds. So I look forward to seeing the official questions that prompted this question. Thanks, Payal
Himanshu, Good question. IMO, we should retain the "that" to establish the parallelism clearly. So I would write sentence 1) instead of 2). However, that being said, if you have seen constructions similar to 2) in official questions, then you should bring those up here so that we have a much closer look at them and justify the same on solid grounds. So I look forward to seeing the official questions that prompted this question. Thanks, Payal
Show more
Thanks Payal, I'l get back to you with the Official Question.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.