Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 16:58 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 16:58
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
fameatop
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Last visit: 09 Jun 2017
Posts: 382
Own Kudos:
2,550
 [1]
Given Kudos: 275
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Posts: 382
Kudos: 2,550
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
suyash23n
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Last visit: 09 Oct 2016
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 09-16-2013
GPA: 3.5
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
petrifiedbutstanding
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Last visit: 10 Jul 2019
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
Posts: 107
Kudos: 355
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aks456
Joined: 20 Jul 2012
Last visit: 18 Aug 2016
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 559
Location: India
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 88
Kudos: 157
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
suyash23n
fameatop
I would like to know when is it correct & incorrect to use "In Contrast TO" and "In Contrast WITH" on GMAT and what is the difference between "In Contrast TO" and "In Contrast WITH". Kindly explain WHY the below mentioned sentence are Correct or Incorrect.

    IN CONTRAST WITH the zoo, the park charges no admission.
    IN CONTRAST TO the zoo, the park charges no admission.
    In contrast to the zoo charging admission, the park does not.
    As contrasted with the zoo, the park charges no admission.


Waiting eagerly for AWESOME explanation by experts.

Regards,
Fame

Hi. In GMAT, both of them are correct, however it depends on the usage and context.
In fact, i would like to now when to use what out of the to idioms.
"In contrast to" is used with nouns and "contrast with " is used when contrast acts as a verb..
X stands in contrast to Y
He/she contrast X with Y

Experts please correct me if i am wrong...
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,891
 [6]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,891
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fameatop
I would like to know when is it correct & incorrect to use "In Contrast TO" and "In Contrast WITH" on GMAT and what is the difference between "In Contrast TO" and "In Contrast WITH". Kindly explain WHY the below mentioned sentence are Correct or Incorrect.

    IN CONTRAST WITH the zoo, the park charges no admission.
    IN CONTRAST TO the zoo, the park charges no admission.
    In contrast to the zoo charging admission, the park does not.
    As contrasted with the zoo, the park charges no admission.


Waiting eagerly for AWESOME explanation by experts.

Regards,
Fame
Fame,

I'm happy to help. See this blog ----
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idioms-of-comparison/
for a full explanation. Here's the skinny ----
IN CONTRAST WITH the zoo, the park charges no admission.
IN CONTRAST TO the zoo, the park charges no admission.

Both 100% correct.

In contrast to the zoo charging admission, the park does not.
The problem here is not the comparative idiom but the fundamental grammatical construction. The structure [preposition][noun][participial phrase] is trainwreck-wrong on the GMAT. If you want to talk about that much action, don't cram it all into a poor little prepositional phrase, which is designed to hold just a static noun, not the full action of a verb.

As contrasted with the zoo, the park charges no admission.
Avoid the "as contrasted to/with" structure on the GMAT.

Mike :-)
User avatar
fameatop
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Last visit: 09 Jun 2017
Posts: 382
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 275
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Posts: 382
Kudos: 2,550
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry


I'm happy to help. See this blog ----
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idioms-of-comparison/
for a full explanation. Here's the skinny ----
IN CONTRAST WITH the zoo, the park charges no admission.
IN CONTRAST TO the zoo, the park charges no admission.

Both 100% correct.

In contrast to the zoo charging admission, the park does not.
The problem here is not the comparative idiom but the fundamental grammatical construction. The structure [preposition][noun][participial phrase] is trainwreck-wrong on the GMAT. If you want to talk about that much action, don't cram it all into a poor little prepositional phrase, which is designed to hold just a static noun, not the full action of a verb.

As contrasted with the zoo, the park charges no admission.
Avoid the "as contrasted to/with" structure on the GMAT.

Mike :-)
Hi Mike,

Thanks & Kudos for the clarification. Can you solve the below mentioned questions because there has been much debate about the OA, but nowhere the explanation is clear.

In Contrast to the symphonies of Haydn, a much freer use of dissonance is evident in the symphonies of Mahler.
A. In contrast to the symphonies of Haydn, a much freer use of dissonance is evident in the symphonies of Mahler.
B. In contrast with Haydn's symphonies, Mahler uses dissonance much more freely.
C. In Contrast to those of Haydn, the symphonies of Mahler demonstrate a much more free use of dissonance.
D. In contrast to Haydn's symphonies, Mahler's demonstrate a much freer use of dissonance.
E. In contrast with Haydn's symphonies, those of Mahler use dissonance much more freely.



Doubt - In every option 'Declaration' is compared to 'Conference'. Everywhere OA mentioned is A, but I doubt the quality of the question itself. What do u think?
In contrast to the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the third Conference of the Parties' Kyoto Protocol created legally binding obligations as a result of intensive negotiations among both developed and developing nations.
A. In contrast to the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the third Conference of the Parties' Kyoto Protocol created legally binding obligations as a result of intensive negotiations among both developed and developing nations
B. In contrast to the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the third Conference of the Parties had intensive negotiations among both developed and developing nations, creating legally binding obligations in their Kyoto Protocol.
C. When compared with the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the third Conference of the Parties had intensive negotiations among both developed and developing nations creating legally binding obligations in the Kyoto Protocol.
D. Compared with the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the third Conference of the Parties had intensive negotiations among both developed and developing nations creating legally binding obligations in the Kyoto Protocol.
E. Compared to the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the intensive third Conference of the Parties' negotiations among both developed and developing nations led to the creating of the Kyoto Protocol's legally binding obligations
avatar
sidpunjabi
Joined: 07 Aug 2019
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In Contrast to the symphonies of Haydn, a much freer use of dissonance is evident in the symphonies of Mahler.
A. In contrast to the symphonies of Haydn, a much freer use of dissonance is evident in the symphonies of Mahler. - Symphonies of Hydn compared to Freer use. INCORRECT
B. In contrast with Haydn's symphonies, Mahler uses dissonance much more freely. - Haydn's symphonies compared to Mahler - INCORRECT
C. In Contrast to those of Haydn, the symphonies of Mahler demonstrate a much more free use of dissonance. - Haydn compared to the symphonies of Mahler - INCORRECT
D. In contrast to Haydn's symphonies, Mahler's demonstrate a much freer use of dissonance. - Haydn's symphonies compared to Mahler's - SEEMS RIGHT. SHORTLIST
E. In contrast with Haydn's symphonies, those of Mahler use dissonance much more freely. - Haydn's symphonies compared to "those of Mahler". Seems ok. But "much more" seems redundant. - INCORRECT

Hence D.

What's the OA?



In contrast to the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the third Conference of the Parties' Kyoto Protocol created legally binding obligations as a result of intensive negotiations among both developed and developing nations.
A. In contrast to the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the third Conference of the Parties' Kyoto Protocol created legally binding obligations as a result of intensive negotiations among both developed and developing nations. - "Made" and "created". Tense matches and they're parallel. SHORTLIST.

B. In contrast to the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the third Conference of the Parties had intensive negotiations among both developed and developing nations, creating legally binding obligations in their Kyoto Protocol.
C. When compared with the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the third Conference of the Parties had intensive negotiations among both developed and developing nations creating legally binding obligations in the Kyoto Protocol.
D. Compared with the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the third Conference of the Parties had intensive negotiations among both developed and developing nations creating legally binding obligations in the Kyoto Protocol.

B,C and D - ELIMINATED. When talking about events that occurred in the past, "had" is usually used for the event that took place first. Since the statement mentions that the third conference took place afterwards, "had" is incorrect. Also, "made" and "creating" are not parallel.

E. Compared to the declarations made at previous UN climate change conferences, the intensive third Conference of the Parties' negotiations among both developed and developing nations led to the creating of the Kyoto Protocol's legally binding obligations - Changes the meaning by stating that the conference was intensive. "Led to the creating" is wrong. Also, very wordy. ELIMINATED
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,422
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,422
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
507 posts
363 posts