Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
23 Sep 2014, 01:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello,
I know the basic property that fewer is for countable items and lesser for uncountable items.
But i have two doubts that are really bothering me :
Doubt 1 :
The cost of this jacket is 20 dollars less than the cost of the other jacket.
-Here we use the property that many countable items , when collectively treated as a single entity, that entity is a uncountable item. so cost would be less and not few.
Is this explanation correct ???
Doubt 2 :
The number of people at the rally is less than 100.
-Is this correct ?? coz i also read the exception rule that when treating with numbers ,(which are actually countable) , we still use lesser .
Pls throw some light on both these doubts . Would request @e-gmat to pls explain the same.
Regards,
kunal
I know the basic property that fewer is for countable items and lesser for uncountable items.
But i have two doubts that are really bothering me :
Doubt 1 :
The cost of this jacket is 20 dollars less than the cost of the other jacket.
-Here we use the property that many countable items , when collectively treated as a single entity, that entity is a uncountable item. so cost would be less and not few.
Is this explanation correct ???
Doubt 2 :
The number of people at the rally is less than 100.
-Is this correct ?? coz i also read the exception rule that when treating with numbers ,(which are actually countable) , we still use lesser .
Pls throw some light on both these doubts . Would request @e-gmat to pls explain the same.
Regards,
kunal
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
23 Sep 2014, 12:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
kunaljain1701
Great examples here. You have a good handle on the basic concept of fewer vs. less (not lesser), but you have been confused by the structure of those examples.
In your Doubt 1, the noun in the sentence isn't dollars, it is cost, which is not a countable noun. You can't say "fewer cost" - you have to say "less cost".
[You could say "This jacket would cost you 20 fewer dollars than the other one."]
In your Doubt 2, the noun in the sentence is really number, not people (people is the object of the preposition). Number itself is a mass noun, an uncountable noun, and would use "less" instead of "fewer".
[You could say "There are fewer than 100 people at the rally."]
KW
23 Sep 2014, 12:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
Thank you so much Kyle !!!
Great explanation !!The constructions that you gave for usage with fewer make them evem more clearer.
Kudos to you !!
BR//
Kunal
Great explanation !!The constructions that you gave for usage with fewer make them evem more clearer.
Kudos to you !!
BR//
Kunal
