Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
On page 652, answer explanation of question #113 of CR section, in the 2nd line of the 'Situation' paragraph (just under the main title ' Argument Construction'), there seems to be an error: "since its tariffs on Borondian TV's" indeed must be "since its tariffs on Vernlandian TV's". Yep?!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
On page 652, answer explanation of question #113 of CR section, in the 2nd line of the 'Situation' paragraph (just under the main title ' Argument Construction'), there seems to be an error: "since its tariffs on Borondian TV's" indeed must be "since its tariffs on Vernlandian TV's". Yep?!
Show more
Dear apolo, I'm happy to respond. Yes, that's definitely a typo. The identical mistake appears in the OG13. You might try to submit feedback at mba.com. Best of luck to you in your studies! Mike
Page 275, Verbal Review, 2nd Edition (Explanation for choice B): "Because the themes of Dove’s poetry encompass the human condition and deal with racial issues, there is no need to make this a compound sentence by introduce a new grammatical subject, she, in a final clause."
Isn't the word 'introduce' here wrong? It should be introducing?!
Page 275, Verbal Review, 2nd Edition (Explanation for choice B): "Because the themes of Dove’s poetry encompass the human condition and deal with racial issues, there is no need to make this a compound sentence by introduce a new grammatical subject, she, in a final clause."
Isn't the word 'introduce' here wrong? It should be introducing?!
Show more
Dear apolo, Yes, my friend, you are perfectly correct. That's another bonafide typo in the official material. As you say, it should be "introducing."
As I have said before, the questions in the official material have been tested and vetted at multiple stages: they are impeccable. By contrast, explanations in the OG have not been tested in front of students, have not been vetted by anything other than probably a couple folks looking them over. Very few pieces of written material on earth have been tested as thoroughly as the GMAT questions: inevitably, there's going to be a drop in quality when we move from their questions to their explanations.
Dear apolo, Yes, my friend, you are perfectly correct. That's another bonafide typo in the official material. As you say, it should be "introducing."
As I have said before, the questions in the official material have been tested and vetted at multiple stages: they are impeccable. By contrast, explanations in the OG have not been tested in front of students, have not been vetted by anything other than probably a couple folks looking them over. Very few pieces of written material on earth have been tested as thoroughly as the GMAT questions: inevitably, there's going to be a drop in quality when we move from their questions to their explanations.
Does all this make sense? Mike
Show more
Thanks Mike for your help. That seems logical. exam tests must be as flawless as possible, because they are used in real exam that is meant to measure test-takers abilities, knowledge, etc., as precisely as possible. Explanations, however, are far less important than questions themselves. I think GMAC can count on me as a reviewer of their explanations, as I read their explanations word by word. Perhaps I should talk to them
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.