Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
How is this different from a present participle modifier?
Does the gerund + participle Absolute phrase allow us to focus on 1 part of the clause?
thanks
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
How is this different from a present participle modifier?
Does the gerund + participle Absolute phrase allow us to focus on 1 part of the clause?
thanks
Show more
Dear GMATDemiGod, I'm happy to respond.
An absolute phrase certainly can have the form of [gerund] + [participle]. Cindy decided to use a quick aerobic workout to stay in shape, running taking so much time. Quite surprisingly, Albert chose a jazz piece for his recital, playing Brahms having been his ideal at one time.
This is different from an ordinary noun modifier. In the first sentence, it would appear the Cindy is not running: running is mentioned as an activity that unknown others do, but not Cindy.
I am not sure what your final question means. What do you mean, "focus on the first part of the clause"?
Unfortunately, I am still a bit confused. I would not think your answers were right, if I read them on the GMAT.
The 2nd part of my question I was basically comparing the function of a traditional past participle with a Gerund+Participle absolute phrase.
What are the advantages of one other the other?
Has this construction appeared on the GMAT before?
Show more
Dear GMATDemiGod, I'm happy to respond. Admittedly, I concocted those examples to fit them into a Procrustean grammatical structure, so they are not the ideal way to express that information.
Using [gerund] + [participle] for an absolute phrase is a quite uncommon structure. I have never seen it on any official question, but I suppose it is possible.
Understand, your question "what are the advantages of one or the other?" is an unusual abstract question. As a general rule, rhetoric often doesn't lend itself to general rules. I am not sure that I would compare this structure to a past participle. For example, if I were going to improve my first sentence, I probably would opt for a subordinate clause: Cindy decided to use a quick aerobic workout to stay in shape because running is so time-consuming. Obviously, that makes the logical relationship very clear, and this is a little more natural sounding. Because the [gerund] + [participle] is already rare, any use of it is likely to sound a little unusual.
Do you have any specific examples in mind? Mike
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.