Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0401:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT
Sep 0712:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
30 Nov 2005, 14:20
Kudos
Bookmarks
Use of ‘had’
His wife divorced him because he had an affair. (wrong per Manhattan’s SC guide)
His wife divorced him because he had had an affair. (correct per Manhattan’s SC guide)
Is first wrong because it does not tell us when the affair was had?
before the divorce or after ? (but if the affair was after the divorce then its weird for a woman to divorce her husband because he would have an affair in his marriage after her divorce with him – by definition the affair can only be had while still married)
the second sentence does not tell us the timing of the affair either. Was it when he was married to this woman or when he was married to his earlier wife. Don’t you think it’s a bit far fetched to assume that in either case she abhorred the idea of that guy cheating, not just with her, but with anyone?
I think if you consider the meaning of the sentence and not apply the grammar rules blindly then there is nothing wrong with the first sentence.
Anyway, what is a sure shot way to completely master this has/had and simple past tense business? I am not a native English speaker.
I did not find Manhattan’s SC guide very helpful. It’s good for other concepts don’t get me wrong.
Is it true that when you have another time reference like ‘time of divorce’ in the earlier sentence or a time comparison one should consider if the activity 1 was completed or is still in progress having started earlier compared to the reference?
Consider this
We thought Joe didn’t go to the circus with his friends.
We thought Joe had not gone to the circus with his friends.
Reference – time when Joe’s friends went to the circus.
Activity 1 – Joe’s departure
Furthermore
Which is correct and why?
If she had more money she would have bought herself a new dress.
If she had had more money she would have bought herself a new dress.
If she had more money she would have had bought herself a new dress.
If she had had more money she would have had bought herself a new dress.
His wife divorced him because he had an affair. (wrong per Manhattan’s SC guide)
His wife divorced him because he had had an affair. (correct per Manhattan’s SC guide)
Is first wrong because it does not tell us when the affair was had?
before the divorce or after ? (but if the affair was after the divorce then its weird for a woman to divorce her husband because he would have an affair in his marriage after her divorce with him – by definition the affair can only be had while still married)
the second sentence does not tell us the timing of the affair either. Was it when he was married to this woman or when he was married to his earlier wife. Don’t you think it’s a bit far fetched to assume that in either case she abhorred the idea of that guy cheating, not just with her, but with anyone?
I think if you consider the meaning of the sentence and not apply the grammar rules blindly then there is nothing wrong with the first sentence.
Anyway, what is a sure shot way to completely master this has/had and simple past tense business? I am not a native English speaker.
I did not find Manhattan’s SC guide very helpful. It’s good for other concepts don’t get me wrong.
Is it true that when you have another time reference like ‘time of divorce’ in the earlier sentence or a time comparison one should consider if the activity 1 was completed or is still in progress having started earlier compared to the reference?
Consider this
We thought Joe didn’t go to the circus with his friends.
We thought Joe had not gone to the circus with his friends.
Reference – time when Joe’s friends went to the circus.
Activity 1 – Joe’s departure
Furthermore
Which is correct and why?
If she had more money she would have bought herself a new dress.
If she had had more money she would have bought herself a new dress.
If she had more money she would have had bought herself a new dress.
If she had had more money she would have had bought herself a new dress.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
