Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
I am a non-native speaker and I scored 17 on my GMAT verbal section, which shows how weak I’m at it. Honestly speaking, i didn’t prepare for verbal section because I wasn’t even good at the basics. I spent 2 hours a day on quant concepts for a week and scored 49. I didnt like Math either in my childhood, but worked on it and now I love Math. That’s is what I want to do with my Verbal section.
Instead of shying away from Verbal section difficulties, I have decided to work on my weakness. I aim to score 45 in my verbal section, a Herculean task, but I feel it can be done if I do my things right. I am planning to take GMAT after a year. So I thought I will take first 2-3 months(2-3 hours a day) to develop reading habit and learn the basics so that I can start building on them once I actually start my GMAT prep. ( I didn’t want to jump right into GMAT prep, as I feel overwhelmed when I try to answer Verbal question because I barely know any concepts and I might even give up if I see my results are discouraging, which is not what I want).
I have started reading Economist and NGC magazines to accustom myself with lengthy passages and articles. If the topic of the article is familiar, I understand the gist of it even when I don’t understand few sentences because of their construction or because of some new words used. As GMAT is not kind enough to give familiar topics on the test, I have to start understanding the sentence formations better.
Below are few sentences I found in the articles I read and they have different constructions
1. While Vox’s leader, Santiago Abascal, criticises illegal immigration, his main pitch is to recentralise government, ban separatist parties and crack down on the Catalan regional administration.
2. SoftBank controls important companies, including Sprint, an American telecoms outfit, and Arm, a British tech firm that is a vital cog in the semiconductor industry.
3. MagicLab’s owner, Andrey Andreev, a Russian billionaire, has faced criticism for presiding over an allegedly sexist culture.
4. From 2001 to 2016, researchers caught ice seals, fur seals, Steller sea lions and northern sea otters from around the Bering Strait, and tested them for PDV, which affects the lungs and brain.
5. Its funding ratio of 40.7% is one of the worst in America, according to the Centre for Retirement Research (crr) in Boston.
6. The situation is getting worse. In 2009 the schemes’ actuaries requested $2.1bn, but only $1.6bn was paid.
7. By 2018 the state paid in $4.2bn, still well short of the $7.1bn the actuaries asked for.
8. Offering workers a defined-benefit pension, where an income based on final salary is paid for the rest of their lives, is an expensive proposition, especially as life expectancies lengthen.
9. Pension shortfalls are common across America, with the average public scheme monitored by the crr just 72.4% funded.
10. In parts of Africa, the benefits of circumcising adolescents can outweigh the costs by about 10 to 1, according to the Copenhagen Consensus Centre (ccc), a think-tank.
11. The narrow ridge, the site of early Jerusalem and today packed with houses occupied mostly by Palestinian residents, conceals a subterranean labyrinth of natural caves, Canaanite water channels, Judaean tunnels, and Roman quarries.
I understood these sentences. However, not always I understand which clause refers to which part of the sentence. Because I’m losing confidence, I am trying too much to understand what I read, which sometimes even causing confusions with list of items separated by , in a sentence with clauses separated by ,.
How can I get better at understanding the sentences when they are too long? Is there a way to understand which clauses refer to which subject/object etc?
Please excuse the lengthy post and the mistakes in it.
Posted from my mobile device
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
It's good that you identified your weak section and started reading magazines. Such reading will improve your both RC and SC capabilities. However, it seems that you might need to refresh your basics and i would suggest to refer Manhattan SC guide. Once, you go through the guide, you can enroll for free trials of test prep companies, having good reviews, to ace GMAT verbal.
sundeep535 well you can surely give a try on reading manhattan verbal books as they are really good especially for SC..
sundeep535
Hi,
I am a non-native speaker and I scored 17 on my GMAT verbal section, which shows how weak I’m at it. Honestly speaking, i didn’t prepare for verbal section because I wasn’t even good at the basics. I spent 2 hours a day on quant concepts for a week and scored 49. I didnt like Math either in my childhood, but worked on it and now I love Math. That’s is what I want to do with my Verbal section.
Instead of shying away from Verbal section difficulties, I have decided to work on my weakness. I aim to score 45 in my verbal section, a Herculean task, but I feel it can be done if I do my things right. I am planning to take GMAT after a year. So I thought I will take first 2-3 months(2-3 hours a day) to develop reading habit and learn the basics so that I can start building on them once I actually start my GMAT prep. ( I didn’t want to jump right into GMAT prep, as I feel overwhelmed when I try to answer Verbal question because I barely know any concepts and I might even give up if I see my results are discouraging, which is not what I want).
I have started reading Economist and NGC magazines to accustom myself with lengthy passages and articles. If the topic of the article is familiar, I understand the gist of it even when I don’t understand few sentences because of their construction or because of some new words used. As GMAT is not kind enough to give familiar topics on the test, I have to start understanding the sentence formations better.
Below are few sentences I found in the articles I read and they have different constructions
1. While Vox’s leader, Santiago Abascal, criticises illegal immigration, his main pitch is to recentralise government, ban separatist parties and crack down on the Catalan regional administration.
2. SoftBank controls important companies, including Sprint, an American telecoms outfit, and Arm, a British tech firm that is a vital cog in the semiconductor industry.
3. MagicLab’s owner, Andrey Andreev, a Russian billionaire, has faced criticism for presiding over an allegedly sexist culture.
4. From 2001 to 2016, researchers caught ice seals, fur seals, Steller sea lions and northern sea otters from around the Bering Strait, and tested them for PDV, which affects the lungs and brain.
5. Its funding ratio of 40.7% is one of the worst in America, according to the Centre for Retirement Research (crr) in Boston.
6. The situation is getting worse. In 2009 the schemes’ actuaries requested $2.1bn, but only $1.6bn was paid.
7. By 2018 the state paid in $4.2bn, still well short of the $7.1bn the actuaries asked for.
8. Offering workers a defined-benefit pension, where an income based on final salary is paid for the rest of their lives, is an expensive proposition, especially as life expectancies lengthen.
9. Pension shortfalls are common across America, with the average public scheme monitored by the crr just 72.4% funded.
10. In parts of Africa, the benefits of circumcising adolescents can outweigh the costs by about 10 to 1, according to the Copenhagen Consensus Centre (ccc), a think-tank.
11. The narrow ridge, the site of early Jerusalem and today packed with houses occupied mostly by Palestinian residents, conceals a subterranean labyrinth of natural caves, Canaanite water channels, Judaean tunnels, and Roman quarries.
I understood these sentences. However, not always I understand which clause refers to which part of the sentence. Because I’m losing confidence, I am trying too much to understand what I read, which sometimes even causing confusions with list of items separated by , in a sentence with clauses separated by ,.
How can I get better at understanding the sentences when they are too long? Is there a way to understand which clauses refer to which subject/object etc?
Please excuse the lengthy post and the mistakes in it.
You can keep a daily routine of reading quality editorials/books for at least 30 mins, it will add a great value to your paragraph reading and understanding skills and help you in RC and SC. Start focusing on basics by following Manhattan books. Also, Oxford books can be considered for concepts understanding. All the best for you prep.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.