1) At present Satellex Radio provides only music stations. However, many Satellex subscribers listen to talk radio stations as well, and they would prefer that Satellex offered talk radio as well. Moreover, subscribers to radio services that provide talk radio usually subscribe for longer periods of time than those who subscribe to music-only services. Therefore, if Satellex added talk radio stations, its profi
ts would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
(A) Satellexs large subscriber base would appeal to talk radio hosts, making it easy for Satellex to hire quality talent for its talk radio stations.
(B) Most talk radio hosts broadcast on advertiser-supported radio stations that listeners can access without paying a subscription fee.
(C) Satellexs costs would rise by adding several talk-radio stations, while many of the listeners who want talk radio are already Satellex subscribers.
(D) Talk radio listeners generally spend more time on a single radio station than do listeners to music radio.
(E) If Satellex added talk radio stations, many of Satellexs music radio hosts would switch to talk-radio stations, making the music stations less appealing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ans-c
reason-debate is music stations v/s talk shows , the argument is -because the ppl subscribe for longer durations with the stations tht host talk shows , channel S will earn more profits if it switches to talk shows
the argument is weaken if the initial cost of set up exceeds the profit tht the station might earn and since ppl have already subscribed to the station S so no new customer base is created ...
this is not an air tight argument as one might content tht may be a customer would subscribe for so long a duration tht it might exceed the initial set up costs and translate into profits ..so try to find better options
a)got nothing to do with profits
b)k..the customer base goes down but may be u start earning more from advertisers ...eliminate b
d)out of scope
e) this some wht strengthens ..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) Zuksha International Airport was once the busiest airport in the region, but two major airlines have relocated to nearby airports, reducing the number of flights in and out of Zuksha by more than half. The gates at Zuksha were built more than thirty years ago and cannot accommodate the largest modern aircraft. In an effort to bring in more business, Zuksha officials plan to build dozens of gates to accommodate modern aircraft and offer reduced-rate leases to airlines willing to make long-term commitments.
Which of the following, if true, most threatens the plans likelihood of success?
(A) Most of the airlines operating out of nearby airports have long-term leases on gates at the other airports.
(B) The existing gates at Zuksha rent at rates that are, on average, much lower than the proposed rates for the new gates to be built there.
(C) Because of highway congestion and changing development patterns that make Zuksha inconvenient to access, airline customers prefer to depart from other airports.
(D) Of the 18 airlines that serve Zuksha or nearby airports, none serve more than one airport in the area.
(E) If the proposed addition is completed, Zuksha will be the largest airport, as measured both by gates and
square footage, in the region.
-------------------"if true, most threatens the plan"-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pay special attention to this ..., this does not apply to the whole argument but just to the plan
so IMO a) coz if the airlines are already have long term leases and thse special gates then they would not break thr contracts to avail the same facilities tht airport Z is offering ..