Last visit was: 13 May 2026, 00:35 It is currently 13 May 2026, 00:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,293
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Vithal
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Last visit: 02 Jan 2020
Posts: 406
Own Kudos:
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 406
Kudos: 769
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
saurabhmalpani
Joined: 19 Sep 2004
Last visit: 14 Nov 2009
Posts: 118
Own Kudos:
Posts: 118
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
christoph
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Last visit: 23 Nov 2011
Posts: 684
Own Kudos:
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Kudos: 1,589
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E)...someone makes an assumption that the team won because the record shows that it had won in the past. so this would be an conclusion based on an statistical assumption. but then someone says that the team did not win because of its record, but because of its attitude. so this statement would weaken the statistical assumption. statistic vs.motivation.
User avatar
Folaa3
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Last visit: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 382
Own Kudos:
Posts: 382
Kudos: 131
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B (sounds like a cause and effect scenario)
User avatar
tareks
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Last visit: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 54
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B- the key is COULD here which implies causality
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,293
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I guessed B as well.

OA is A.

OE:

An analogical argument draws it conclusion by comparing one thing to another. In doing so it makes the assumption that the two things are the same in all relevant ways.

The statement introduces a difference between the two groups, which attacks the assumption that the two things are the same.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
562 posts
363 posts