Some people have questioned the judges objectivity in cases of sex

Question

Some people have questioned the judge’s objectivity in cases of sex discrimination against women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminated against women in cases of sex discrimination against women.

The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that

(A) a large number of the judge’s cases arose out of allegations of sex discrimination against women

(B) many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of sex discrimination against women

(C) the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve sex discrimination

(D) the majority of the cases of sex discrimination against women that have reached the judge’s court have been appealed from a lower court

(E) the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the judge’s cases involving sex discrimination against women

KarishmaB · Accepted Answer

Some people have questioned the judge’s objectivity in cases of sex discrimination against women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminated against women in cases of sex discrimination against women.

The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that

(A) a large number of the judge’s cases arose out of allegations of sex discrimination against women

(B) many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of sex discrimination against women

(C) the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve sex discrimination

(D) the majority of the cases of sex discrimination against women that have reached the judge’s court have been appealed from a lower court

(E) the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the judge’s cases involving sex discrimination against women

Here is the argument:

Premises:

Some people have questioned the judge’s objectivity in cases of sex discrimination against women.

But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in favor of the women.

Conclusion:

So the judge has not discriminated against women in cases of sex discrimination against women.

The conclusion has assuming something. Why does 60% in favour of women mean no discrimination? It is probably saying that in more than 50% cases, the judge favoured the woman so he is not biased against women. But here is my problem - what if women were right in 90% of the cases? Then in 30% cases, he favoured men unfairly. So we cannot conclude that the judge has not discriminated against women.
The question asks for a flaw. What we discussed above is the flaw.

(A) a large number of the judge’s cases arose out of allegations of sex discrimination against women

Actual number of cases is immaterial. We are only discussing percentages here.

(B) many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of sex discrimination against women

The point is whether this judge is objective or not. Whether many judges are not objective is irrelevant.

(C) the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve sex discrimination

The argument talks about "judge’s objectivity in cases of sex discrimination against women". What happens in other cases is irrelevant.

(D) the majority of the cases of sex discrimination against women that have reached the judge’s court have been appealed from a lower court

How the cases reached him is irrelevant.

(E) the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the judge’s cases involving sex discrimination against women

Exactly. If there is reason to believe that women are right in say 90% cases, 60% is a poor figure. It doesn't imply that the judge is objective. This is the flaw.

Answer (E)

A discussion on Flaw in Reasoning: https://youtu.be/3s0tWn3tiT8

_________________

-
Start FREE with selected GMAT/EA Content upon registration at anaprep.com

YouTube Channel: karishma.anaprep

Signature Read More

nravi549 · Answer

(a) a large number of the judge’s cases arose out of allegations of sex discrimination against women
So what? Let it be! We are not looking for number of cases comes into the Judge's plate.

(b) many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of sex discrimination against women
Doesn't explain whether Judge is wrong or right.

C) the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve sex discrimination
The argument is not worrying about non sex discrimination cases.

(D) the majority of the cases of sex discrimination against women that have reached the judge’s court have been appealed from a lower court
Still, this doesn't prove whether judge is wrong or right.

(E) the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the judge’s cases involving sex discrimination against women
Yep. This answer shows that the judge has discrimination against women!

n22 · Answer

i didn"t understand what is the question saying and why e is an answer instead of a?

akshayk · Answer

Some people have questioned the judge’s objectivity in cases of sex discrimination against women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminated against women in cases of sex discrimination against women.

Here's what the argument stem is saying.
 SOME people  have questioned the judge's objectivity.
 BUT, records show  that the judge has decided in favor of the women in 60% of the cases.
 Conclusion -  The record demonstrates that the judge  HAS NOT discriminated against women .

We need to find a fault in the above argument that the judge   HAS NOT   discriminated against women. In other words, we need to weaken the argument presented above.

This doesn't help us determine whether the judge discriminated, or he didn't. This just tells us how a large number of the cases arose. This is a trick option, but is incorrect. OUT!

We are talking about 1 judge. This one is too general, and is irrelevant. OUT!

This has nothing to do with the argument presented above. OUT

How the cases reach the judge is irrelevant to the argument. OUT!

This attacks the conclusion by stating that on the contrary, the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than 60% of the cases involving sex discrimination against women.
So E is the answer.

Hope it helps.

Skywalker18 · Answer

Some people have questioned the judge’s objectivity in cases of sex discrimination against women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminated against women in cases of sex discrimination against women.

Type- Flaw
Boil it down - Since the judge has given 60 % of decisions in favor of women , the judge has not discriminated against women in cases of sex discrimination against women.
- The argument is flawed because it wants us to assume that 60% is a high number . But what if more than 60 % - say 90% of the cases should have been in favor of women.

(A) a large number of the judge’s cases arose out of allegations of sex discrimination against women - Irrelevant - % is provided so number is irrelevant
(B) many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of sex discrimination against women - Irrelevant
(C) the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve sex discrimination - Out of scope 
(D) the majority of the cases of sex discrimination against women that have reached the judge’s court have been appealed from a lower court - Irrelevant
(E) the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the judge’s cases involving sex discrimination against women - Correct

Answer E

egmat · Answer

The correct answer is option E.

Let us see why.

Conclusion here:  The judge has been objective i.e. has not discriminated against women

Author's logic: 
1. In 60% of the cases, the judge decided in favour of the women.

What is the flaw in this argument?  
The author has assumed that just because the judge has decided a majority of the cases, 60% in this case, in favour of women, he has not discriminated.

But - how do we know whether this is a proper basis for making such a claim?

For instance, what if in reality, if the judge was truly objective, 80% or 90% of the cases would have been decided favourable to women?

The Flaw:  The author ignores the possibility that women would have won more than 60% of these cases, if the decisions were truly objective, unbiased, with no discrimination.

(A) a large number of the judge’s cases arose out of allegations of sex discrimination against women
Actual number of cases is immateral - remember, we are dealing with percentages in this question. This only tells us that a big chunk of the judge's cases were cases with allegations of sex discrimination against women.

(B) many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of sex discrimination against women
How difficult judges find it to be objective - irrelevant. What matters is whether this particular judge was truly objective.

(C) the judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve sex discrimination
Cases that do not involve sex discrimination. Completely irrelevant to the argument about whether the judge was objective with cases involving sex discrimination

(D) the majority of the cases of sex discrimination against women that have reached the judge’s court have been appealed from a lower court
Irrelevant - the mechanism/how these cases reached the judge

(E) the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the judge’s cases involving sex discrimination against women 
As per prethinking

Hope this helps.

Sneha2021 · Answer

egmat   KarishmaB 
Can you please explain the meaning of A?

DmitryFarberMPrep · Answer

Sneha2021

A is just saying that the judge has heard many such cases, so it suggests that the 60% is not just a fluke of small numbers. But it gives us no additional information to determine whether 60% is a fair rate. If all of the women's cases were valid, then the judge might still be discriminating (or just doing a poor job). Whereas, if only 60% or fewer of the cases  should  have been decided in favor of the woman, then it's fair to use the 60% rate to suggest that the judge is not discriminating against women.

KarishmaB · Answer

The question talks about the judge's objectivity in a certain type of cases.
What type of cases are we talking about? Cases involving "sex discrimination against women" (women not getting equal pay, or not getting promoted because they are women etc.)

The argument further says that since in 60% of such cases, the judge favoured the woman, he is not discriminating.

(A) a large number of the judge’s cases arose out of allegations of sex discrimination against women

This option says that the judge gets many cases of this type (cases involving "sex discrimination against women" ). 
Does it matter to the argument? We are talking about the percentage of cases in which he favoured the women. Does the actual number of cases matter (that he got 10 cases of this type or 100 cases of this type)?
It doesn't hence (A) is not the answer.

ArnauG · Answer

The argument states that the judge's record of deciding in favor of women in 60% of sex discrimination cases demonstrates the judge's lack of discrimination against women. However, the argument fails to consider the possibility that:

(E) the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the judge’s cases involving sex discrimination against women.

This option suggests that the judge's decisions may not accurately reflect a lack of discrimination. Instead, it raises the possibility that the judge's decisions were not in line with the strength of the evidence or the merits of the cases. If the judge should have ruled in favor of women in more than 60% of the cases, it would weaken the argument's claim that the judge's record demonstrates a lack of discrimination.

Gemmie · Answer

The argument states that the judge's objectivity is demonstrated by the fact that he has decided in favor of women in 60% of sex discrimination cases against women. However, this conclusion is flawed because it does not consider whether 60% is an appropriate or fair percentage based on the merits of the cases.The argument is flawed because it ignores the possibility that:

(E) the evidence shows that the women should have won in more than sixty percent of the judge’s cases involving sex discrimination against women 
 
If the evidence suggests that women should have won in more than 60% of the cases, then the judge's 60% record may actually indicate a bias against women. The fact that women won 60% of the cases does not necessarily demonstrate impartiality if, based on the evidence, they deserved to win a higher percentage. Thus, the judge's decisions may still be biased despite the 60% statistic.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

Some people have questioned the judges objectivity in cases of sex

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Some people have questioned the judges objectivity in cases of sex

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia